A little-known not-for-profit group sued some 90 coffee retailers, including Starbucks, on grounds they were violating a Calif

admin2021-03-06  39

问题   A little-known not-for-profit group sued some 90 coffee retailers, including Starbucks, on grounds they were violating a California law requiring companies to warn consumers of chemicals in their products that could cause cancer.Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Elihu Berle said in a decision dated Wednesday that Starbucks and other companies had failed to show there was no significant risk from a carcinogen produced in the coffee roasting process, court documents showed.Studies have previously found that in large quantities, acrylamide can increase the risk of cancer in some animals.It’ s among the chemicals California lists as "known to cause cancer".
  Some 90 coffee retailers were sued for violating a California law and were required to warn consumers of chemicals in their products that could cause cancer.Court documents illustrated that there was no ________ from a carcinogen produced in the coffee roasting process.

选项

答案significant risk

解析 由 Court documents, carcinogen, coffee roasting process 可定位至该段第二句“Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Elihu Berle said in a decision dated Wednesday that Starbucks and other companies...”法庭文件显示,洛杉矶高等法院法官Elihu Berle 在周三的一项判决中表示,星巴克和其他公司未能证明咖啡烘焙过程中产生的致癌物没有显著风险。significant risk意为“显著风险”,故本空填significant risk。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/gbtMFFFM
0

最新回复(0)