首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
What if our society uses new-found technologies of "genetic engineering" to interfere with the biological nature of human beings
What if our society uses new-found technologies of "genetic engineering" to interfere with the biological nature of human beings
admin
2013-03-27
43
问题
What if our society uses new-found technologies of "genetic engineering" to interfere with the biological nature of human beings? Might that not be disastrous?
What about cloning, for instance?
Cloning is a term originally used in connection with nonsexual reproduction of plants and very simple animals. Now it is coming into use in connection with higher animals, since biologists are finding ways of starting with an individual cell of a grown animal and inducing it to multiply in the same way in the future.
But is cloning a safe thing to unleash on society? Might it not be used for destructive purposes? For instance, might not some ruling group decide to clone their submissive, downtrodden peasantry, and thus produce endless hordes of semi-robots who will slave to keep a few in luxury and who may even serve as endless ranks of soldiers designed to conquer the rest of the world?
A dreadful thought, but an unnecessary fear. For one thing, there is no need to clone for the purpose. The ordinary method of reproduction produces all the human beings that are needed and as rapidly as is needed. Right now, the ordinary method is producing so many people as to put civilization in danger of imminent destruction. What more can cloning do?
Secondly, unskilled semi-robots cannot be successfully pitted against the skilled users of machine, either on farms, in factories or in armies. Any nation depending on downtrodden masses will find itself an easy mark for exploitation by a less populous but more skilled and versatile society. This has happened in the past often enough.
But even if we forget about self-hordes, what about the cloning of a relatively few individuals? There are rich people who could afford the expense, or politicians who could have the influence for it, or the gifted who could undergo it by popular demand. There can be two of a particular banker or governor or scientist—or three—or a thousand. Might this not create a kind of privileged caste, who would reproduce themselves in greater and greater numbers, and who would gradually take over the world?
Before we grow concerned about this, we must ask whether there will really be any great demand for cloning. Would you want to be cloned? The new individual that is formed by your cell will have your genes and therefore your appearance and, possibly, talents, but he will not be you. The clone will be, at best, merely your identical twin. Identical twins share the same genetic pattern, but they each have their own individuality and are separate persons.
Cloning is not a pathway to immortality, then, because your consciousness does not survive in your clone, any more than it would in your identical twin if you had one.
In fact, your clone would be far less than your identical twin. What shapes and forms a personality is not genes alone, but all the environment to which it is exposed. Identical twins grow up in identical surroundings, in the same family, and under each other’s influence. A clone of yourself, perhaps thirty or forty years younger would grow up in a different world altogether and would be shaped by influences that would be sure to make him less and less like you as he grows older.
He may even earn your jealousy. After all, you are old and he is young. You may once have been poor and struggled to become well-to-do, but he will be well-to-do from the start. The mere fact that you won’t be able to view him as a child, but as another competing and better-advantaged you, may accentuate the jealousy.
No! Imagine that, after some initial experiments, the demand for cloning will be virtually nonexistent.
The central theme of the essay is______.
选项
A、genetic engineers are experimenting with cloning
B、the cloning of human could produce a privileged class
C、worries about the dangers of human cloning are ill-founded
D、personality traits cannot be passed on through cloning
答案
C
解析
通读全文可知,文章开头就以问题的形式提出:“如果我们的社会使用新发现的技术‘基因工程’干扰人的生物性会如何呢?这可能会带来灾难性的影响吗?”接着作者解释,我们没必要对克隆之事恐惧和担心。因此C项为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/fzgYFFFM
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Manyinstructorsbelievethataninformal,relaxedclassroomenvironmentis【C1】______tolearningandinnovation.Itisnotuncom
Aman-madechemicalthatattractsmalegypsymothsbyduplicatingthenaturalattractantoffemalegypsymothshasbeenpatented
Amidremarkableprogressoninflationandfiscalreform,Italyheadsinto1998withbrightprospectsforeconomicgrowthandits
Thedirectoroftheresearchinstitutecameinpersonto_____thateverythingwasallright.
Successfulbusinesstendstocontinueimplementingtheideasthatmadethemsuccessful.Butinarapidlychangingworld,ideaso
Theroleofgovernmentinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapable.Sometimes,thestatetriestomanagetheresour
Iamgratefulforyour______invitation,andI’dliketoacceptyourofferwithpleasure.
IhaveneverseenMrs.Clarkbefore,butIknowfromhermedicalchartandthereportIreceivedfromtheprecedingshiftthatt
Itisoftenobservedthattheagedspendmuchtimethinkingandtalkingabouttheirpastlives,【71】aboutthefuture.Theseremin
Thebusinessofadvertisingistoinventmethodsofaddressingmassiveaudiencesinalanguagedesignedtobeeasilyaccessible
随机试题
血海穴属()。
果糖胺的测定可反映多长时间内糖尿病患者血糖的总水平?
对原发性肾上腺皮质功能减退症,最具诊断价值的是
男,3岁。因1个月来咳嗽偶有低热,作结核菌素试验:PPD5U,48~72小时检查皮肤红肿硬结直径20mm,判断其结果是
刘女士计划从今年开始给儿子积攒大学费用,目前已经有5万元,计划未来每个月再定期存入1000元,收益率可以达到每年4%。根据以上材料回答问题。刘女士的儿子今年8岁,如果18岁时上大学,则届时刘女士可以积累的教育金应为()元。
2010年某省8个地市的财政支山(单位:万元)分别为:59000500026560266450780007800078000132100这组数据的中位数和众数分别是( )万元。
菩萨中被分为“三大士”的是指()。
在意识本质问题上,庸俗唯物主义的错误在于()。
Readthefollowingarticleandchoosethebestwordforeachspace.Forquestions26-45,markoneletterA,B,CorDonthe
Talkischeapwhenitcomestosolvingtheproblemoftoo-big-to-failbanks.Fromtheluxuryofeventoday’sstutteringeconomic
最新回复
(
0
)