2. 考研
  3. How did we get brains big enough to create machines with artificial intelligence? Some suggest that it was to help keep track of

How did we get brains big enough to create machines with artificial intelligence? Some suggest that it was to help keep track of

admin2018-02-17  12
问题    How did we get brains big enough to create machines with artificial intelligence? Some suggest that it was to help keep track of all the people, and their roles, within our growing social groups. Large, well-integrated and co-ordinated groups improved our chances of survival because they made the division of labour possible.
   The alternative explanation is that our brain power is due to needing brains that facilitated problem-solving and invention. Whatever the cause, our evolved problem-solving abilities have thrown a spanner in the works. Google’s artificial intelligence machine AlphaGo upends the evolved social contract. Now we can only hope that the machine will help us understand how to preserve the value of individuals who have no contribution to make.
   Until recently, for instance, Lee Sedol’s unique selling point lay in his ability to beat all-comers at the ancient Asian game of Go. Now a team of human beings equipped with AlphaGo, an AI tool, have beaten him. After the first defeat, Sedol pronounced himself "in shock". After the second defeat he was "quite speechless". After the third he confessed he felt "powerless".
   This quiet revolution has already started. You know about Google’s self-driving car. Artificial intelligence is already better than most doctors at interpreting medical scans. It is organising school timetables and finding the optimal delivery schedule for supermarket supplies: getting Easter eggs into the hands of slavering infants involves AI.
   You’re not even going to notice the takeover. Next time you’re in a supermarket, give the self-service checkout a hard stare. It’s essentially a static robot. And this robot has human assistants. Those people who turn up when you attempt to buy alcohol are summoned by the machine.
   The human assistant is still necessary, but only because the manufacturers and programmers made a decision to limit the robot’s capabilities. They didn’t have to: if we decided we wanted fully autonomous robot checkouts, we could equip them to read iris scans or fingerprints, or simply use face recognition.
   And that would require us to sign up and hand over our biometric data. Given a little time to get used to the idea, most of us probably would do, and more jobs will go. That tells us something about why we should start coming to terms with the implications of AlphaGo’s success.
   It’s not clear our big, clever brains can solve the problem. Maybe those who profit from making human roles redundant could pay a "human capital gains" tax: we could charge the innovators for replacing a job and divert the money into social programmes. But how to make Google pay to implement its AI? We may have found the problem AlphaGo can’t solve.
What can be inferred from the last paragraph?
选项 A、The human brain is actually too complicated to solve many thorny issues.
B、World governments should think about charging AI companies taxes.
C、Even AlphaGo has no idea how to make Google implement its AI.
D、The future relationship between man and AI will be anything but harmonious.
答案B
解析 推测题。最后一段表达的主要意思是：谁受益，谁纳税。与之含义最接近的是选项[B]。选项[A]“人类的大脑太过复杂，难以解决许多棘手的问题”，文中没有提及。选项[C]“即使阿法狗也不知道该如何让谷歌实施它的人工智能计划”，此选项在原文中几乎可以找到原句，但这只是作者提出的带有些许揶揄的问题，并非本段的主题。选项[D]“在将来，人类和人工智能之间的关系将一点都不和谐”，属于主观臆断。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/fzX7FFFM
0

考研英语一

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)