首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Anyone making long drives this summer will notice a new dimension to contemporary inequality: a widening gap between the users o
Anyone making long drives this summer will notice a new dimension to contemporary inequality: a widening gap between the users o
admin
2010-01-18
36
问题
Anyone making long drives this summer will notice a new dimension to contemporary inequality: a widening gap between the users of automatic toil-paying devices and those who pay cash. The E-ZPass system, as it is called on the East Coast, seemed like idle gadgetry when it was introduced a decade ago. Drivers who acquired the passes had to nose their way across traffic to reach specially equipped tollbooths—and slow to a crawl while the machinery worked its magic. But now the sensors are sophisticated enough for you to whiz past them. As more lanes are dedicated to E-ZPass, lines lengthen for the saps paying cash.
E-ZPass is one of many innovations that give you the option of trading a bit of privacy for a load of convenience. You can get deep discounts by ordering your books from Amazon.com or joining a supermarket "club." In return, you surrender information about your purchasing habits. Some people see a bait-and-switch here. Over time, the data you are required to hand over become more and more personal, and such handovers cease to be optional. Neato data gathering is making society less free and less human. The people who issue such warnings—whether you call them paranoids or libertarians—are among those you see stuck in the rippling heat, 73 cars away from the "Cash Only" sign at the Tappan Zee Bridge.
Paying your tolls electronically raises two worries. The first is that personal information will be used illegitimately. The computer system to which you have surrendered your payment information also records data about your movements and habits. It can be hacked into. Earlier this year, as many as half a million customers had their identities "compromised" by cyber-break-ins at Seisint and ChoicePoint, two companies that gather consumer records.
The second worry is that personal information will be used legitimately—that the government will expand its reach into your life without passing any law, and without even meaning you any harm. Recent debate in Britain over a proposed "national road-charging scheme"—which was a national preoccupation until the London Tube bombings—shows how this might work. Alistair Darling, the transport secretary, wants to ease traffic and substitute user fees for excise and gas taxes. Excellent goals, all. But Darling plans to achieve them by tracking, to the last meter, every journey made by every car in the country. It seems that this can readily be done by marrying global positioning systems (with which many new cars are fitted) with tollbooth scanners. The potential applications multiply: what if state policemen in the United States rigged E-ZPass machines to calculate average highway speeds between toll plazas—something easily doable with today’s machinery—and to automatically ticket cars that exceed 65 m.p.h.?
There is a case to be made that only a citizenry of spoiled brats would fret over such things. Come on, this argument runs, anyone who owns an anti-car-theft device—Lo Jack in the United States or NavTrak in Britain—is using radio tracking to make a privileged claim on government services. If your LoJack-equipped Porsche is stolen, you can call the local police department and say, in effect, "Go fetch." Stolen cars with such devices are almost always recovered. Car theft has fallen precipitously, which benefits us all.
For some time, the United States has required commercial trucks to register their mileage and routes. Last year, Germany initiated a new, more efficient G.P.S.-based truck-tracking system that seems intrusion-proof. Authorities dis card the records after three months, which means they can’t use them to arrest criminal truckers or dun deadbeat ones. Can such forbearance last?
In Germany, where history makes lax surveillance seem the lesser evil. yes. But not in the United States. Since the Warren Court, voters have. again and again, risen up against any libertarian trammeling of government in its fight against crime. People waver on whether to trade privacy for convenience, but they’re pretty untroubled about trading privacy for security. On occasion, E-ZPass records have been used to track down criminal suspects.
When such crime-fighting aids are available, people clamor for them. In October, the F.D.A. approved, for medical use, the VeriChip, a device the size of a grain of rice. It can be implanted under a patient’s skin and activated to permit emergency personnel to gain access to personal medical records. It’s extremely useful when patients are unconscious, but there is a suspicion that the real application lies elsewhere. Similar devices can easily be fitted with other types of trans mitters. "Active" implants are already being put to other uses: to trace livestock and lost pets and. in Latin America, to discourage kidnappings. Those who can put two and two together will find this VeriUnsettling. Monitoring can quickly change from convenience to need. Would you support a chip-based security system for nuclear power plant employees? If you were in the Army Special Forces, wouldn’t you want a transmitter embedded in you?
In more and more walks of life, if what you want to do is not trackable, you can’t do it. Most consumers have had the experience of trying to buy something negligible—a pack of gum, say—and being told by a cashier that it’s impossible because "the computer is down." It now seems quaint that after the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995. Congress argued over whether "taggants" should be required in explosives to make them traceable. Today everything is traceable. Altered plant DNA is embedded in textiles to identify them as American. Man-made particles with spectroscopic "signatures" can be used, for example, as "security tags" for jewels. The information collected about consumers is the most sophisticated and confusing taggant of all. It is a marvelous tool, a real timesaver and a kind of electronic bracelet that turns the entire world into a place where we are living under house arrest.
If you always purchase good through internet, what will happen?
选项
A、You become dependent of it
B、You can’t get goods which make you feel satisfactory
C、Your privacy is faced with danger
D、Your will make your personal data completely public
答案
C
解析
第三段和第四段讲述了使用电子付款的两大隐忧,集中体现为个人信息的外泄和被非法使用。故选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/fA9YFFFM
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
HowdidtheOlympicGamesstart?InancientGreeceathleticfestivalswereveryimportantandhadstrong【C1】______.Originallyt
ManypeoplewillhaveheardoftheAlexandertechniquebuthaveonlyavagueideawhatitisabout.Untilearlierthisyear,Id
Mankind’sfascinationwithgoldisasoldascivilizationitself.TheancientEgyptiansesteemedgold,whichhadreligioussigni
Americanshavefourprimaryavenuesformakingfriends:atwork,atschool,throughahobbyora【C1】______suchasvolunteerwork
A、Sendinginvitationcardstoasmanypeopleaspossible.B、Reservingatableatleastonedayinadvance.C、Takingyourorderb
Extract1Astylishdiningroomwithcreamwallsandcurtainsandblackcarpetasperfectfoiltoaneclecticarrayoffurni
A、Sleepassoonaspossible.B、Napevenduringdaytime.C、Getagoodnight’ssleep.D、Relaxyourselfinacafe.C
A、Thebuyerhastopay5%ofthevalueofthepropertytobeboughtinthefirstplace,andpaytherestoftheamountoninstal
A、Shehadpromisedthatshewould.B、Shehasbeensick.C、Sheneedshisapprovalforherschedule.D、Shemustverifyhisplan.
A、Theworld-famousOpenUniversity.B、ThechangingeducationalsysteminBritain.C、FurtherandcontinuouseducationinBritain.
随机试题
A.胃大部切除术B.穿孔缝合修补术C.腹膜炎症重的行穿孔缝合术D.胃十二肠壁水肿较轻的行胃大部切除术E.胃十二肠壁水肿严重的行穿孔缝合术胃十二指肠溃疡急性穿孔患者,一般情况好的行()
关于药品质量标准的概念不正确的是:
A.结脉B.促脉C.代脉D.微脉E.弱脉脉沉细而软者,称为
业主方和项目各参与方,如()等都有各自的项目管理任务,上述各方都应该编制各自的项目管理任务分工表和管理职能分工表。
关于价内税和价外税,下列说法中错误的是()。
建筑密度是指规划地块内各类建筑基底面积占()的比例。
儿童已经具有了明显的符号性和逻辑性,能进行简单的逻辑推演,克服了思维的自我中心性,思维活动仍局限于具体的事物及日常经验,缺乏抽象性,这在皮亚杰儿童智力发展阶段中属于()。
某中学生在上网查询资料时,发现有人正在利用国际互联网泄露国家重要的经济情报。他及时将此事报告了有关部门。这名中学生履行了()。
当一事物存在时,其自身已经包含着自我肯定和自我否定的因素,构成事物自我发展的内在基础。()
Thefundisfor______distressamongthefloodvictimsinthesoutherncity.
最新回复
(
0
)