Early this week a bit of cheery news was reported by the Manhattan Institute, a conservative think tank: black segregation has h

admin2014-09-05  49

问题     Early this week a bit of cheery news was reported by the Manhattan Institute, a conservative think tank: black segregation has hit its lowest point in more than a century — declining in all 85 of the nation’s largest metropolitan areas. Nevertheless, the report is largely celebratory in tone, and it has been received in that fashion by much of the news media. Before we break out the champagne, however, it may be wise to pause and reflect for a moment on who was excluded from the analysis.
    Our nation’s prison population has more than quintupled(soaring from 300,000 in the mid-1970s to more than 2 million today), due to a "get tough" movement and a war on drugs that has been waged almost exclusively in poor communities of color. Studies have consistently shown that people of color are no more likely to use or sell illegal drugs than whites, but a fierce drug war has been waged nonetheless, and harsh mandatory minimum sentences passed, leading to a prison-building boom unprecedented in world history. Despite this sea change, prisoners continue to be treated as nonentities in much sociological and economic analysis.
    In the Manhattan Institute study, prisoners are not even mentioned, despite the fact that millions of poor people — overwhelmingly people of color — are removed from their communities and held in prisons, often hundreds of miles from home. Most new prison construction has occurred in predominately white, rural communities, and thus a new form of segregation has emerged in recent years. Bars and walls keep hundreds of thousands away from mainstream society — a form of apartheid unlike the world has even seen. If all of them suddenly returned, they would not be evenly throughout the nation’s population. Instead they would return to a relatively small number of communities defined by race and class, greatly intensifying the levels of segregation we see today.
    Those who imagine that the failure to account for prisoners can’t possibly affect the analysis would be wise to consider the distortion of unemployment figures in recent years. According to Harvard professor Bruce Western, standard unemployment figures underestimate the true jobless rate by as much as 24 percentage points for less educated black men. In fact, during the 1990s — the economic-boom years — noncollege black men were the only group that experienced a sharp increase in unemployment, a development directly traceable to the sudden explosion of the prison population. At the same time that unemployment rates were sinking to record low levels for the general population, the true jobless rate among noncollege black men soared to a staggering 42% .
    Prisoners do matter when analyzing the severity of racial inequality in the U. S. Yet because they are out of sight and out of mind, it is easy to imagine that we are making far more racial progress than we actually are. For now, let’s keep the cork in the bottle and pray that we will eventually awaken from our color-blind slumber to the persistent realities of race in America.
The statistics in Paragraph 4 is cited by the author to illustrate that______.

选项 A、the unemployment rate for black people are persistently high
B、black people constitutes the largest population group in prison boom
C、the standard unemployment figures underestimate the true jobless rate
D、prison population do matter when conducting sociological or economical analysis

答案D

解析 作者在第四段第一句话中就交代了这一段的写作目的。因为作者考虑到有些人会认为他提出来的囚犯在人口普查中所起的重要作用感到怀疑,因此他特意列举了失业数据的例子来说明问题。统计的结果发现,因为没有将囚犯人口统计在内,因此造成了失业数据的大幅失真。作者通过这个例子,并不是想就事论事地讨论失业率的问题,故[A]、[C]错误;而是讨论囚犯人口在人口普查中的不可忽视的地位,故正确答案应该选[D]。而[B]黑人是监狱人口膨胀中的主力军,这个观点作者在第二段中就有所论述,在第四段中并未提及。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/diMRFFFM
0

最新回复(0)