首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting
admin
2010-06-30
44
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it—convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trail system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing hard to win, challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross examination of the key witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a con test) with the continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge plays a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal" —especially a religious event—was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this way eventually abandoned the two systems parted company. On the continent church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jurymen who were illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramatic; much of it is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the U. S. A. has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, Americans lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case, and the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed to meet witness beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. Being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
The passage ______.
选项
A、questions whether the system of trial by jury can ever be completely efficient
B、suggests a number of reforms which should be made to the legal system of various countries
C、describes how the British legal system works and compares it favourably with other systems
D、compares the legal systems of a number of countries and discusses their advantages and disadvantages
答案
D
解析
综合全文,我们可以看到,文章第一段指出了英国法律制度存在的弊端,第二段谈到英国法律制度的优点,第三段谈到英国法律制度相比法国法律制度存在的利弊,第四、第五段则评述了英美国家法律制度的异同。由此我们可以推断,全文的主旨是将几国的法律制度相比较并阐述了他们各自的利弊,因此正确答案应当为D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/d5nsFFFM
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
YouwillhearaninterviewwithMikeRowe,hostoftheAmericanTVshowDirtyJobs.Asyoulisten,answerthequestionsorcompl
Therewasatimeinthelate17thcenturywhennorespectablemonarchwouldbeseenwithoutaguitar.BothLouisXIVandCharle
Somedoctorsaretakinganunusualnewapproachtocommunicatebetterwithpatients—theyareletting【C1】______readthenotestha
Somedoctorsaretakinganunusualnewapproachtocommunicatebetterwithpatients—theyareletting【C1】______readthenotestha
YouwillhearaninterviewwithStevenCasey,onhumanfactorsindesign.Asyoulisten,answerthequestionsorcompletetheno
OnNovember5th1605,abandofEnglishCatholichotheadsplannedtodetonate36barrelsofgunpowderundertheHouseofLords.
Whatarethespeakerstryingtodo?
A=RotherhitheB=BarnesC=WillesdenD=King’sCrossWhichcity...usedtohavelotofproblemssuchasdrugs,streetc
A=RotherhitheB=BarnesC=WillesdenD=King’sCrossWhichcity...usedtohavelotofproblemssuchasdrugs,streetc
Friday本题答案信息也是隐含在最后一个话轮男士的最后一句中:...orjustcomehereonthenextmorningtogettheresult。这一题与上一题的听音和答题紧密相关,因为前面说的是Thursday(星期
随机试题
参加资格考试时,考生常常被迫参加强制性的考前培训,购买指定教材,花了不少的“冤枉钱”。为了参加一项考试,除了交足报名费、考试费等各项费用之外,还往往要交钱买指定教材,参加指定培训,前些年就已经拿到导游证的小陈对此还是耿耿于怀,对那笔冤枉钱总觉得收得没道理。
物理变化与化学变化的本质区别是()。
十二经脉气血充盛有余则渗注于
确定上述变更属于哪类变更。列出工程变更从提出到确认的几个步骤。除背景中提到的三条构造裂缝防治措施外,再列举两条防治措施。
下列叙述中正确的是()。
20世纪80年代以来,国际金融市场最重要的创新便是金融衍生品市场的发展。最早出现的是简单的衍生品,如远期、期货、期权、互换等,随后出现了多种复杂产品。20世纪90年代信用衍生品的出现,将金融衍生品市场的发展推向新的阶段。在2007年爆发的美国次贷危机中,信
公安机关应经常向广大群众宣传同违法犯罪作斗争的重大意义,激励他们积极参加打击刑事犯罪的工作,讲清同刑事犯罪作斗争是法律赋予每个公民的权利和义务,是每个热爱社会主义祖国的公民义不容辞的政治责任和社会责任,鼓励群众见义勇为。()
The(i)______ofturtlesandtortoisesis(ii)______;onegianttortoiseinaCalcuttazooisbelievedtohavereachedtheageof
Whowillprobablyreadthispage?Thosewhowantto______inAustraliaandNewZealand.Howmanyweb-pagesdidthesearcheng
Whileitseemsprettyobviousthatgratitudeisapositiveemotion,psychologistsfordecadesrarelydelved(探究)intothescience
最新回复
(
0
)