首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2016-08-13
27
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such e-valuation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
Which of the following statements is true according to the passage?
选项
A、Students’ likes and interests are the standards of evaluation of a teacher’s lecturing.
B、Students are actually capable of judging the class accomplishments of lectures.
C、Students are academically capable of making comments on the skills of teaching.
D、Students are not to give assessments of a teacher’s lecturing.
答案
B
解析
参考文章第二段,可知作者认为学生有能力评判教师的讲课水平。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/c5jGFFFM
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Animportantbusinessmanwasaskedtogiveatwenty-minutespeechinanothercity.Hewastoobusytowriteithimself,soheas
IntheUS,peoplepreferwaitingforatabletosittingwithpeopletheydon’tknow.Thismeansahostessmaynotscatasmallg
Cananimalsbemadetoworkforus?Somescientiststhinkthatonedayanimalsmaybetrainedtodoanumberofsimplejobsthat
Yourbody,whichhascloserelationswiththefoodyoueat,isthemostimportantthingyouown,soitneedspropertreatmentan
—Wastheclasslongenough?—No,itwash’t______enough.
Ifyouarelikemostpeople,yourintelligencevariesfromseasontoseason.Youareprobablyalotsharperinthespringthany
UncleSamisatall,thinman.He’sanoldermanwithwhitehairandawhitebeard.Heoftenwearsatallhat,abowtie,andth
UncleSamisatall,thinman.He’sanoldermanwithwhitehairandawhitebeard.Heoftenwearsatallhat,abowtie,andth
ThenorthernpartsoftheUnitedStatesgetverycoldinthewinter.Itsnowsagreatdealandthetemperatureoftengoes【C1】___
UncleSamisatall,thinman.He’saneldermanwithwhitehairandawhitebeard.Heoftenwearsatallhat,abowtie,andth
随机试题
下列票据不能见票即付的是()
属于肾上腺素能神经纤维的是
阿托品中毒一氧化碳中毒
王某和李某因涉嫌共同破坏电力设备罪被逮捕。本案存在下列证据,那么根据我国的非法证据排除规则,不能作为证据使用的是:
( )是沥青混凝土路面施工中常见质量控制的关键点。
混凝土中加入防冻剂可以保证水泥在相应负温下的()作用。
融资租赁租金中的租赁手续费内容包括()。
以下叙述中,错误的是()。
【B1】【B5】
Shamsanddelusionsareestimatedforsoundesttruths,whilerealityisfabulous.Ifmenwouldsteadilyob-serverealitiesonly
最新回复
(
0
)