首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
What makes for a successful invasion? Often, the answer is to have better weapons than the enemy. And, as it is with people, so
What makes for a successful invasion? Often, the answer is to have better weapons than the enemy. And, as it is with people, so
admin
2009-08-13
43
问题
What makes for a successful invasion? Often, the answer is to have better weapons than the enemy. And, as it is with people, so it is with plants—at least, that is the conclusion of a paper published in Biology Letters by Naomi Cappuccino, of Carleton University, and Thor Arnason, of the University of Ottawa, both in Canada.
The phenomenon of alien species popping up unexpected parts of the world has grown over the past few decades as people and goods become more mobile and plant seeds and animal larvae have hitched along for the ride. Most such aliens blend into the ecosystem in which they arrive without too much fuss. (Indeed, many probably fail to establish themselves at all—but those failures, of course, are never noticed.) Occasionally, though, something goes bananas and starts trying to take the place over, and an invasive species is born. Dr. Cappuccino and Dr. Arnason asked themselves why.
One hypothesis is that aliens leave their predators behind. Since the predators in their new homelands are not adapted to exploit them, they are able to reproduce unchecked. That is a nice idea, but it does not explain why only certain aliens become invasive. Dr. Cappuccino and Dr. Arnason suspected this might be because native predators are sometimes "pre-adapted" to the aliens’ defences, but in other cases they are not.
To test this, they had first to establish a reliable list of invaders. That is not as easy as it sounds. As they observe, "although there are many lists of invasive species published by governmental agencies, inclusion of a given species in the lists may not be entirely free of political motivation". Instead, they polled established researchers in the field of alien species, asking each to list ten invasive species and, for comparison, ten aliens that just rubbed along quietly with their neighbours. The result was a list of 21 species widely agreed to be invasive and, for comparison, 18 non-invasive aliens.
Having established these lists, they went to the library to find out what was known about the plants’ chemistry. Their aim was to find the most prominent chemical weapon in each plant, whether that weapon was directed against insects that might want to eat the plant, bacteria and fungi that might want to infect it, or other plants that might compete for space, water, nutrients and light. Botanists know a lot about which sorts of compounds have what roles, so classifying constituent chemicals in this way was not too hard.
The researchers then compared the chemical arsenals of their aliens with those of native North American plants, to see if superior (or, at least, unusual) weaponry was the explanation for the invaders’ success. Their hypothesis was that highly invasive species would have chemical weapons not found in native plants, and which pests, parasites and other plants would therefore not have evolved any resistance to. The more benign aliens, by contrast, were predicted to have arsenals also found in at least some native species.
And so it proved. More than 40% of the invasive species had a chemical unknown to native plants, just over 10% of the non-invasive aliens had such a chemical. Moreover, when they looked at past studies on alien plants that had examined how much such plants suffer from the depredations of herbivorous insects, they found that the extent of the damage reported was significantly correlated with the number of native species with which that alien shared its principal chemical weapon.
For alien plants, then, the real secret of success—also as in human warfare—is surprise. It is not that the chemicals concerned are more toxic in any general sense (indeed, successful invaders are often rare in their own native habitats). Rather, it is that the locals just don’t see them coming.
选项
A、plant seeds are resistant to antibiotics.
B、people tend to hitch a ride.
C、there are more circulation of goods.
D、animal larvae become stronger.
答案
C
解析
本题是细节题。由题干中的关键词alien species定位至第二段。首句明确指出:过去的几十年,随着人和货物的流动日益频繁,植物种子和动物幼体也乘机“搭便车”四处播散,世界各地无意间出现了越来越多的外来物种。可见,货物流动增多是外来物种入侵的原因之一,故[C]为答案。[A]及[D]未提及,排除。这里搭便车的主体是plant seeds和animal larvae,并非people,[B]属于张冠李戴,排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/bv9YFFFM
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Thespeakermainlydiscusses______.
A、TheislandsbelongedtoRussiabeforeWorldWarⅡ.B、ThechainislandsareunderJapanesegovernment’scontrolnow.C、Theothe
A、Therearethreemostprevalentdiseasesintheworld.B、Malariaistreatableandpreventable.C、Africanchildrendiefrommala
MillionsofbooksandanInternet-basedcampusnetworkareavailablefortheUniversitystaffandstudents.
Whatdidthespeakerexpectoflifeinacountrytown?
WhatisthesimilaritybetweenDanoneandDeoleo?
TheLakeDistrictinnorth-westEnglandisanarearemarkablylittleaffectedbyindustrialization.Theprincipalactivityisst
A、Ithinkthecandidateisnotqualified.B、Ithinkthecandidateneednotbechecked.C、Ithinkthecandidate’slettersofreco
我进入经济界的时候在思考这样一个问题:“什么才能造就一个好社会?”也就是说,什么才是好的公共政策,还有,政府的作用是什么?显然,政府发挥着巨大的作用。一个稳定的政府应该制定真正的法律,根据法律自律自制,有一系列稳定的货币和金融机构来保证货币的价值,并在这个
TheNewZealanderwhorepresentsQueenElizabethHinNewZealandiscalled
随机试题
A.心悸伴消瘦出汗B.心悸伴晕厥C.心悸伴心前区疼痛D.心悸伴呼吸困难E.心悸伴发热
A.十二经脉B.奇经八脉C.十五别络D.十二经筋E.十二皮部十二经脉之气结、聚、散、络于筋肉、关节的体系是
男性,60岁,急性胸前区疼痛2小时入院,病情危重,上级医生指示,除积极寻找急性心肌梗死的依据外,还需进行胸痛的鉴别诊断,下列哪项与鉴别诊断无关
《保护文学和艺术作品伯尔尼公约》是著作权领域第一个世界性多边国际条约,以下关于其说法错误的是哪一项?
()揭示了政府在运用公共资源提供公共产品时所存在的政府失灵现象,为政府采购的快速发展提供了最根本的合法性论证。
分析取源部件的取样点的周围不应有()、物料堵塞或非生产过程的化学反应。
下列不属于强化服务的要求的是()。
2015年是中国人民抗日战争暨世界反法西斯战争胜利70周年。()
当使用Threadt=newThread(r)创建一个线程时,表达式:rinstanceofThread的值是【】。
Theycallthemthenewbreadearners.Theyarewomen,andtheyaresettotakeover.Womenarebeginningtorise【C1】______to
最新回复
(
0
)