首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
From the perspective of the poor, it seems obvious that the benefits would outweigh the costs. The benefits to poor people of no
From the perspective of the poor, it seems obvious that the benefits would outweigh the costs. The benefits to poor people of no
admin
2013-02-16
36
问题
From the perspective of the poor, it seems obvious that the benefits would outweigh the costs. The benefits to poor people of no longer being poor would be enormous. Their intake of protein and other nutrition would increase their choice of housing and the quality of the housing they select would improve. Crimes related to poverty(that the poor generally commit against each other)— murder, rape, robbery, burglary, child abuse, spouse abuse, and drug related crimes—would probably decrease. Apart from these specific improvements, the poor would benefit by an increase in the control over their own lives. Increased purchasing power represents a part of this. More money to spend not only permits the purchase of additional goods and services but greatly widens the choice of goods and services that potentially could be purchased. The poor, if no longer poor, would also gain greater control of various non-fiscal aspects of their lives. As their economic stake in society increases, their political stake is likely to increase as well. They will note more, and thus exercise a greater influence in municipal, local, state, and federal elections. As a result, elected officials will respond to them more effectively. Agencies of government—police, fire, sanitation, streets, parks, and so forth—will also respond more promptly and effectively. Public school systems in particular will be more responsive. The former poor who dislike the education their children are getting in public schools will have an increased ability to " vote with the dollars " by enrolling their children in previously unaffordable private schools or moving to living quarters in previously unaffordable communities. Responding to the former poor will become a matter of survival for the teachers and administrators who depend for their livelihood on the public schools.
While the benefits to the poor of enjoying a right not to be poor may for the most part be obvious, some potential disadvantages—to them — should also be considered. First, will not the creation of a right not to be poor reduce the motivation of the poor to exert themselves to get out of poverty? It is arguable that to the extent that self-help is rendered unnecessary to achieve a minimum living standard, many of the poor will refrain from enrolling in the schools, undertaking the enterprises, and in general taking the risks that today elevate many of them not only above the poverty line but into the middle class and beyond. The establishment of a right not to be poor could result, arguably, in the poor as a whole—or at least a substantial percentage of them—ending up economically worse off in the long run. Second, to the extent that a guarantee of non-poverty reduces the poor’s incentive to exert themselves, will there not be a parallel reduction in their innovative contributions to the economic well-being of our entire society—including the well-being of the former poor along with the well-being of the rest of us? In other words, a guarantee of non-poverty may arguably induce the poor child — whose deprivation would otherwise have spurred the child to graduate from high school, finish college, get a Ph.D. in physics, and win the Nobel Prize for devising a way to produce cheaper energy — to refrain, because of the security offered by the guarantee, from embarking on a course that would greatly benefit all former poor people as well as society as a whole.
It can be inferred from the first paragraph that______.
选项
A、the benefits excel definitely the costs from the perspective of the poor
B、the costs excel the benefits definitely from the perspective of the poor
C、the benefits to poor people of no longer being poor would be enormous
D、the benefits excel the costs is not absolute
答案
C
解析
推断题目。解题点在文章第一段。第一段中举了大量的例子说明脱离贫困后,穷人生活的改善情况,包括经济方面的以及非经济方面的。因此,正确答案是C选项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/avgYFFFM
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
FoodanddrinkplayamajorroleinChristmascelebrationsinmostcountries,butinfewmoresothaninMexico.Manyfamilies
21.Wemightbeinclinedtoattributetotheactofthinkingcompletefromlanguageiftheindividualformedorwereabletofor
ThehistoryofAfrican—Americansduringthepast400yearsistraditionallynarrated【41】anongoingstraggleagainst【42】andindif
ThehistoryofAfrican—Americansduringthepast400yearsistraditionallynarrated【41】anongoingstraggleagainst【42】andindif
ThehistoryofAfrican—Americansduringthepast400yearsistraditionallynarrated【41】anongoingstraggleagainst【42】andindif
Onereactiontoalltheconcernabouttropicaldeforestationisablankstarethatasksthequestion,"SinceIdon’tliveinthe
ThomasWolfeportrayedpeoplesothatyoucametoknowtheiryearnings,theirimpulses,andtheirwants--thiswaseffective____
Inordertohelpthestudentsgetabetterunderstandingofthenewconception,theprofessor____itwithmanyexamples.
Formostofus,theworkisthecentral,dominatingfactoflife.Wespendmorethanhalfourconscioushoursatwork,preparing
A、knowB、knewC、hadknownD、haveknownC文章在此处主要是是对虚拟语气的考查,是对过去事实的虚拟。因为主句是couldhavebeenavoided,从句应该用过去完成时(haddone),因此本题答案为C。
随机试题
利用机械加工方法改变毛坯的形状、尺寸,使之成为成品零件的过程称为机械加工工艺过程。()
有亂君,無亂國;有治人,無治法。弈之法非亡也,而弈不世中;禹之法猶存,而夏不世王。故法不能獨立,類不能自行;得其人則存,失其人則亡。法者,治之端也;君子者,法之原也。故有君子,則法雖省,足以徧矣;無君子,則法雖具,失先後之,不能應事之變,足以亂矣。不知法之
一个住所在意大利的英国公民死亡,未留遗嘱,留有动产在英国。按照英国的冲突法规则,动产继承适用被继承人的住所地法(意大利法),但意大利的冲突规范规定动产继承适用被继承人的本国法(英国法)。如果英国法院最终以英国法来处理,就构成()
(2002年第37题)引起儿童肾病综合征的最常见肾小球疾病是
中医学称“急性心肌梗死”为
2006年6月20日,“扬威”号货轮由大连港驶往广州港。7月20日,接近上海港时遭遇海上风暴,其间货轮结构遭到严重破坏,船上一批燃油泄漏进大海中。接到求救信号后,“风烟”号对“扬威”号进行了救助,使得“扬威”号脱离险境,船上大部分货物得以保全。但由于“风烟
杨某受某厂指派在本县范围内收购茶叶2万斤,厂方提供了介绍信、营业执照副本。杨某收购后未向税务机关纳税。县税务局知悉后即作出决定,杨某须缴纳增值税5000余元。杨某不服,认为自己是接受某厂的指派,与该厂是委托关系,其税款应当由厂方缴纳,县税务局未采纳杨某的意
期货公司应当建立客户资料档案,除依法接受调查和检查外,应当为客户保密。()
对出口应税消费品退(免)消费税的优惠政策包括()。
当所有的观察值y都落在直线上时,则z与y之间的相关系数为()。
最新回复
(
0
)