首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
On July 7th, I was traveling in London. I was having breakfast at a hotel very near Liverpool Street Station when the first expl
On July 7th, I was traveling in London. I was having breakfast at a hotel very near Liverpool Street Station when the first expl
admin
2013-08-05
38
问题
On July 7th, I was traveling in London. I was having breakfast at a hotel very near Liverpool Street Station when the first explosion was detonated. Hearing the sirens and seeing London’s emergency personnel respond to the bombings brought back vivid memories of the events of Sept. 11, 2001.
People have not forgotten Sept. 11, 2001. Americans can still recall exactly where they were and what they were doing on that fateful day. But it’s understandable that some remember it as historical fact, lacking the painful impact and immediacy they originally felt. If we allow a dimming of purpose—to eliminate terrorism—these terrorist attacks in London serve as another chilling reminder that we’re still at war.
Something constructive emerges from these tragic, horrible and unexplainable attacks. It is the message that we must remain vigilant in opposing an enemy who intentionally targets innocent civilians.
Since Sept. 11, 2001, the civilized nations of the world have remained mostly united in opposing these despicable, wanton acts of terror. We have had some great successes in that effort. We have arrested perpetrators and plotters, and we have foiled planned attacks. We have reduced the power and scope of those who despise freedom and democracy.
The effort must continue. As we learned Thursday—and in Madrid and Bali—the enemies of freedom have not lost their resolve. We must not lose ours.
Ultimately, the only real defense from terrorist attacks is being able to find out about them in advance. Intelligence gathering has improved but needs to be even stronger, including consistently improving human intelligence and patrol. Police and ordinary citizens must be alert and encouraged to convey information.
Once a terrorist incident does occur, there’s no such thing as a perfect response. By definition, a terrorist attack means people are being hurt or killed. But by studying the response to past attacks, we can better prepare to handle those in the future.
London is one of the most secure cities in the world, steeped in years of dealing with terrorism. The city’s preparation and resolve was evident on Thursday. I am very impressed by London’s reaction to the bombings. Both the emergency personnel and the citizens seemed prepared. The first responders were rapid, well-directed, organized and professional, in accordance with obviously well-tested plans.
As for the citizens, at least a dozen people told me in one way or another, "We knew this was going to happen; it was just a question of when."
That is not only a realistic assessment; it also is a mindset that just might save lives. Political, business and community leaders are sometimes reluctant to talk about terrorism or stage drills to prepare their response because they don’t want to frighten or upset people. But that’s a mistake. People react to emergencies more effectively when they’re not shocked by them.
Tony Blair and London Mayor Ken Livingstone have made preparedness a priority, and their efforts clearly paid off during Thursday’s response to the attacks.
There’s another benefit to preparing for terrorism in advance. Part of the damage the terrorists hope to inflict is the emotional reaction in the wake of the destruction. The reason it’s called "terrorism" is that they want fear and its debilitating effects to linger long after the smoke has cleared.
By preparing citizens for the possibility of a terrorist attack, leaders can help minimize the emotional response in the wake of the destruction.
Finally, Thursday’s attacks demonstrate that we must remain committed to confronting and eliminating terrorism. There are those who assert that the efforts to eliminate terror are somehow provoking the terrorists. That is wrong. The terrorists have been attacking innocent people long before Sept. 11, 2001, or the wars in Afghanistan or Iraq.
Seeing Prime Minister Blair speak so forcefully, with President Bush, President Jacques Chirac and other world leaders right behind him, was encouraging. Let’s remember the unity the world shared after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
Free nations can and will disagree. But let us always remember that free people must be steadfast and resilient in defending our way of life.
According to the passage, which of the following is NOT the way to defend terrorist attacks?
选项
A、Improving human intelligence and patrol.
B、Alerting police and citizens to terrorism.
C、Finding out terrorists before they attack.
D、Studying the response to past attacks.
答案
D
解析
从第6段的内容不难看出,A、B、C三项的内容都有提到,而D项(研究对过去袭击所做出的反应)在第7段提到,是为恐怖袭击发生后做准备,不属于“防御”的范围,故选D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/aRRYFFFM
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Childrentodayspendmoretimestareatcomputerand【M1】______TVscreensbothatschoolandathome.Scientific【M2】
WhichofthefollowingisthelargestprovinceinCannada?
Criticismofresearchlaysasignificantfoundationforfutureinvestigativework,butwhenstudentsbegintheirownprojects,t
Oncefound"almostentirelyinthewesternUnitedStatesandinAsia,dinosaurfossilsarenowbeingdiscoveredonallsevencon
IwasborninFeb.12,1809,inHardinCounty,Kentucky.MyparentswerebothborninVirginia,ofundistinguishedfamilies--secon
AllofthefollowingstatementsabouterroranalysisaretrueEXCEPTthat______.
"Wordsarenamesorlabelsforthings."Thisviewiscalled______insemanticsense.
FeelslikeSpringIstopatthecomerdrugstoreforabreakfastofdoughnutsandcoffee,andthenIracetothesubwaystati
WhichofthefollowingisCORRECT?
泊珍到偏远小镇的育幼院把生在那里养到一岁的孩子接回来。但泊珍看他第一眼,仿似一声雷劈头而来,令她晕头胀脑,这1岁的孩子脸型长得如此熟悉,她心里的第一道声音是,不能带回去痛苦纠聚心中,眉心发烫发热,胸口郁闷难展,胃里一股气冲喉而上。院长说这孩子发
随机试题
中等尺寸基本型群钻就是在标准麻花钻上加磨月牙槽,修磨槽刃和磨出单面分屑槽。()
A.早发性胎心减速B.晚期减速C.变异减速D.NST有反应E.NST无反应足月临产,胎膜破裂排出棕黄色羊水,胎儿监护时可能出现
患者,女性,65岁。高血压10年,不规则服药。某日晨起突发头痛,意识不清,立刻送往医院。体检:昏迷,血压210/110mmHg,双眼向右侧凝视,左足外旋位。下列辅助检查对明确诊断最具有价值的是
A.腹痛B.腹胀C.腹部包块D.呕吐E.停止排气排便低位小肠梗阻的主要症状有
A.0.02%NaF漱口液B.0.05%NaF漱口液C.0.2%NaF漱口液D.1.23%NaF凝胶E.2%NaF溶液每日漱口使用的是
某男,60岁,咳喘胸满,但坐不得卧,喉间痰鸣如拽锯,咯痰黏腻难出,舌苔厚浊,脉象滑实。治疗方剂宜首选
关于不作为犯罪,下列哪一选项是正确的?()(2016/2/1)
环境影响评价工程师在其职业资格登记有效期内接受继续教育的时间应累计不少于()。
下列关于法律尽职调查的表述中,错误的是()。
关于房地产市场供给的特点的说法,错误的是()
最新回复
(
0
)