Most firms’ annual general meetings (AGMs) owe more to North Korea than ancient Greece. By long-standing tradition, bosses make

admin2011-03-11  35

问题     Most firms’ annual general meetings (AGMs) owe more to North Korea than ancient Greece. By long-standing tradition, bosses make platitudinous speeches, listen to lone dissidents with the air of psychiatric nurses towards patients and wait for their own proposals to be rubber-stamped by the proxy votes of obedient institutional investors.  According to Manifest, a shareholder-advice firm, 97% of votes cast across Europe last year backed management.  
    So should corporate democrats be cheered by the rebellion over pay at Royal Dutch Shell? At the oil giant’s AGM on May 19th, 59% of voting shareholders sided against pay packages for top executives. In particular they disliked 4.2 million ($ 5.8 million) in shares dished out to five executives, which comprised about 12% of their total pay for 2008.Under the firm’s rules, such awards should be granted only if Shell’s total return in the year is in the top three of its peer group. In 2007 and 2008, Shell came a very close fourth, so the firm decided to pay out anyway.  
    Shell is hardly a poster child for malfeasance: it is performing well, its pay is similar to that at other big oil firms and its shareholders previously gave directors discretion to bend the rules. They have used it to cut pay in the past. Still, although the vote is not binding, it is seriously embarrassing. The turnout was decent, at about 50%, and several big fund managers were clearly furious. The payouts have already been made and probably cannot be reversed, but Shell will be in disgrace for a while. Jorma Ollila, its chairman, said he took the vote "very seriously" and promised to "reflect carefully". After GSK, a British drugs firm, had a rebellion on pay in 2003, it completely redrew its pay policy.  
    It is not just Shell that is facing unrest. Rough markets and a wider political uproar over pay have fuelled discontent across corporate Europe. Almost half of the voting shareholders at BP, another oil giant, failed to support its pay policies in April. At Rio Tinto, a mining firm with a habit of digging holes for itself, a fifth of voting shareholders rejected its remuneration policy. So far this year 15% of votes cast on pay in Britain have dissented, compared with 7% last year. In continental Europe owners are grumpy, too: in February almost a third of voting shareholders at Novartis, a Swiss drugs firm, demanded the right to approve its remuneration policy each year.  
    But taking bosses to task for their ever-escalating salaries is not a substitute for keen oversight of performance and strategy. At Royal Bank of Scotland, which had to be rescued by taxpayers last year, 90% of voting shareholders rejected its pay policies last month. Yet back in August 2007, 95% of them ticked the box in support of the acquisition of ABN AMRO, the deal that brought the bank to its knees.
Which of the following may NOT be the reason that "fuelled discontent across corporate Europe" ?

选项 A、The economic downturn has made the market rougher and sharply decreased the performance of companies.
B、By way of gaining back control over pay, investors want to express their concerns about the company’s strategy and thus promote better performance, or even oversee the operation.
C、Investors deem that senior managers of the European countries should be held responsible for the poor performance in recent period of time.
D、Companies fail to give investors their share award as promised due to corruption and fraud committed by the executives.

答案D

解析 A项对应文中“rough markets”,其后也说了“fuelled discontent across corporate Europe”。B项对应“以其不断见长的薪水为由指责老板还不如指责他们在工作和战略制定上的疏忽”,因此是要更好地让公司运作,故而激起了对现在公司的不满。C项对应文中一直在说股东否决高管的薪酬计划,原因就是认为他们应该为业绩不佳负责,也即文中的“a wider political uproar over pay”。D项是说腐败与欺诈,但是这在文中并未提及,因经济危机是当前状况的主要原因,故D为正确选项。   
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/Yg0RFFFM
0

最新回复(0)