首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Does the Internet Make You Dumber? [A]The Roman philosopher Seneca may have put it best 2,000 years ago: "To be everywhere is to
Does the Internet Make You Dumber? [A]The Roman philosopher Seneca may have put it best 2,000 years ago: "To be everywhere is to
admin
2014-06-30
37
问题
Does the Internet Make You Dumber?
[A]The Roman philosopher Seneca may have put it best 2,000 years ago: "To be everywhere is to be nowhere. " Today, the Internet grants us easy access to unprecedented amounts of information. But a growing body of scientific evidence suggests that the Net, with its constant distractions and interruptions, is also turning us into disrupted and superficial thinkers.
[B]The picture emerging from the research is deeply troubling, at least to anyone who values the depth, rather than just the velocity(速度), of human thought. People who read text studded with links, the studies show, comprehend less than those who read traditional linear text. People who watch busy multimedia presentations remember less than those who take in information in a more sedate(镇定的)and focused manner. People who are continually distracted by e-mails, alerts and other messages understand less than those who are able to concentrate. And people who juggle(尽力同时应付)many tasks are less creative and less productive than those who do one thing at a time.
[C]The common thread in these disabilities is dispersing our attention. The richness of our thoughts, our memories and even our personalities hinges on our ability to focus the mind and sustain concentration. Only when we pay deep attention to a new piece of information are we able to associate it "meaningfully and systematically with knowledge already well established in memory," writes the Nobel Prize winning neuroscientist(神经科学家)Eric Kandel. Such associations are essential to mastering complex concepts.
[D]When we’re constantly distracted and interrupted, as we tend to be online, our brains are unable to generalize the strong and expansive neural connections that give depth and distinctiveness to our contemplating. We become mere signal-processing units, quickly shepherding disjointed bits of information into and then out of short-term memory.
[E]In an article published in Science last year, Patricia Greenfield, a leading developmental psychologist, reviewed dozens of studies on how different media technologies influence our cognitive abilities. Some of the studies indicated that certain computer tasks, like playing video games, can enhance "visual literacy skills" , increasing the speed at which people can shift their focus among icons and other images on screens. Other studies, however, found that such rapid shifts in focus, even if performed adeptly, result in less rigorous and "more automatic" thinking.
[F]In one experiment conducted at Cornell University, for example, half a class of students was allowed to use Internet-connected laptops during a lecture, while the other had to keep their computers shut. Those who browsed the Web performed much worse on a subsequent test of how well they retained the lecture’s content. While it’s hardly surprising that Web surfing would distract students, it should be a note of caution to schools that are wiring their classrooms in hopes of improving learning.
[G]Ms. Greenfield concluded that " every medium develops some cognitive skills at the expense of others. " Our growing use of screen-based media, she said, has strengthened visual-spatial intelligence, which can improve the ability to do jobs that involve keeping track of lots of simultaneous signals, like air traffic control. But that has been accompanied by " new weaknesses in higher-order cognitive processes," including " abstract vocabulary, mindfulness, reflection, inductive problem solving, critical thinking, and imagination. " We’re becoming, in a word, shallower.
[H]In another experiment, recently conducted at Stanford University’s Communication between Humans and Interactive Media Lab, a team of researchers gave various cognitive tests to 49 people who do a lot of media multitasking and 52 people who multitask much less frequently. The heavy multitaskers performed poorly on all the tests. They were more easily distracted, had less control over their attention, and were much less able to distinguish important information from trivial.
[I]The researchers were surprised by the results. They had expected that the intensive multitaskers would have gained some unique mental advantages from all their on-screen juggling. But that wasn’t the case. In fact, the heavy multitaskers weren’t even good at multitasking. They were considerably less adept at switching between tasks than the more infrequent multitaskers. " Everything distracts them," observed Clifford Nass, the professor who heads the Stanford lab.
[J]It would be one thing if the ill effects went away as soon as we turned off our computers and cellphones. But they don’t. The cellular structure of the human brain, scientists have discovered, adapts readily to the tools we use, including those for finding, storing and sharing information. By changing our habits of mind, each new technology strengthens certain neural pathways and weakens others. The cellular alterations continue to shape the way we think even when we’re not using the technology.
[K]The pioneering neuroscientist Michael Merzenich believes our brains are being "massively remodeled" by our ever-intensifying use of the Web and related media. In the 1970s and 1980s, Mr. Merzenich, now a professor emeritus at the University of California in San Francisco, conducted a famous series of experiments on primate brains that revealed how extensively and quickly neural circuits change in response to experience. When, for example, Mr. Merzenich rearranged the nerves in a monkey’s hand, the nerve cells in the animal’s sensory cortex quickly reorganized themselves to create a new "mental map" of the hand. In a conversation late last year, he said that he was profoundly worried about the cognitive consequences of the constant distractions and interruptions the Internet bombards us with. The long-term effect on the quality of our intellectual lives, he said, could be " deadly".
[L]What we seem to be sacrificing in all our surfing and searching is our capacity to engage in the quieter, attentive modes of thought that underpin contemplation, reflection and introspection. The Web never encourages us to slow down. It keeps us in a state of perpetual mental locomotion. It is revealing, and distressing, to compare the cognitive effects of the Internet with those of an earlier information technology, the printed book. Whereas the Internet scatters our attention, the book focuses it. Unlike the screen, the page promotes contemplativeness.
[M]Reading a long sequence of pages helps us develop a rare kind of mental discipline. The innate bias of the human brain, after all, is to be distracted. Our predisposition is to be aware of as much of what’s going on around us as possible. Our fast-paced, reflexive shifts in focus were once crucial to our survival. They reduced the odds that a predator would take us by surprise or that we’d overlook a nearby source of food.
[N]To read a book is to practice an unnatural process of thought. It requires us to place ourselves at what T. S. Eliot, in his poem "Four Quartets" , called "the still point of the turning world". We have to forge or strengthen the neural links needed to counter our instinctive distractedness, thereby gaining greater control over our attention and our mind.
[O]It is this control, this mental discipline, which we are at risk of losing as we spend ever more time scanning and skimming online. If the slow progression of words across printed pages damped our craving to be inundated by mental stimulation, the Internet indulges it. It returns us to our native state of distractedness, while presenting us with far more distractions than our ancestors ever had to contend with. —Nicholas Carr is the author, most recently, of "The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains".
Unprecedented amounts of information can make our thoughts scattered.
选项
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/X7qFFFFM
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
Somestudentsarenotadequatelypreparedforcollege.Shouldweturnthemaway?【B1】______them?Ormodifyourproduct?American
Thejobofraisingchildrenisatoughone.Childrendon’tcomewithaninstruction【C1】______.Andeachchildisdifferent.Sop
A、Thewaterwillflowsouth.B、Thesealevelwillrise.C、Theoceanwillbecomemoreacid.D、Thefloodswilldestroycities.B女士
A、Theywererejectedcompletely.B、Theywereoverwhelming.C、TheywerewrittenintoConstitution.D、TheyinfluencedalotofAme
A、Tomakegreatprofit.B、Toboostmarketshare.C、Todistinguishfromimitators.D、Toenhanceitpopularity.C短文提到,宜家推出的PS系列旨在将
CanTonyBlairSavetheWorldofBooks?AtthebeginningofAJourney,TonyBlairboaststhathehas"thesoulofarebel".
TheamountoffloatingplastictrappedinanorthAtlanticcurrentsystemhasn’tgotanybiggerin22years,despitemoreandmo
TheamountoffloatingplastictrappedinanorthAtlanticcurrentsystemhasn’tgotanybiggerin22years,despitemoreandmo
Oneofthemostimportantsocialdevelopmentsthatmadepossibleashiftinthinkingabouttheroleofpubliceducationwasthe
A、Interested.B、Indifferent.C、Suspicious.D、Negative.D女士建议男士选择坐游轮去希腊或者土耳其旅行,男士说味道油腻的食物不合自己的胃口,言下之意就是不接受这个建议,故选D。
随机试题
Youhadbetternot_________therealone.
患儿生后4个月出现发绀,杵状指,气急,X线平片示心影呈“靴形”,右心室增大,肺少血。最可能为
某安装公司分包了一冶炼厂部分机械设备安装,其中包括8台空气压缩机、10台离心式风机、3台50t桥式起重机、3台水泵、10台胶带输机、10台螺旋输机、10台斗式提升机和两台球磨机的安装,其中风机、胶带及螺旋输送机、提升机、球磨机属于连接工艺线上的设备。合同工
政府机构构成的六要素中,属于政府机构行使行政权力、履行行政职责的物质基础是()。
根据美国心理学家卡特尔的观点,流体智力随机体的衰老而减退,而晶体智力则随一个人年龄的增长而增长。()
________是巴洛克音乐的标志性特征,它的产生导致了和声学的诞生,并促使大小调体系的产生。
给定资料1.2017年10月18日,习近平总书记在党的十九大报告中开宗明义指出,大会的主题是:不忘初心,牢记使命,高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜,决胜全面建成小康社会,夺取新时代中国特色社会主义伟大胜利,为实现中华民族伟大复兴的中国梦不懈奋斗。党
在党的十八届五中全会提出了创新、协调、绿色、开放、共享的发展理念。其中,共享发展理念的内涵包括
戊戌维新运动的失败,主要是由于维新派自身的局限和以慈禧太后为首的强大的守旧势力的反对。其中局限性主要表现为()
Manyinstructorsbelievethataninformal,relaxedclassroomenvironmentis【1】tolearningandinnovation.Itisnotuncommon
最新回复
(
0
)