首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Read the following article from a newspaper and answer questions 19-25. For questions 19-25, choose the correct answer A, B,
Read the following article from a newspaper and answer questions 19-25. For questions 19-25, choose the correct answer A, B,
admin
2019-03-04
34
问题
Read the following article from a newspaper and answer questions 19-25.
For questions 19-25, choose the correct answer A, B, C or D.
Are You Afraid of MOOCs?
Are MOOCs and other online materials a threat to quality public higher education, and to our role as professors? The members of the philosophy department at San Jose State University think so. They recently issued an open letter to Michael Sandel, a professor of Harvard University, objecting to his role in encouraging the use of MOOCs at public universities. The controversy stems from San Jose State’s contract with edX, a company that provides MOOCs, including one based on Sandel’s course on justice at Harvard. San Jose State has agreed to use materials provided by edX, but the philosophy department has refused to use Sandel’s online lectures in its courses. Though MOOCs are still new, many of the arguments presented by the San Jose State philosophy professors do not ring true in light of my experience.
We should begin by distinguishing two issues. The philosophy professors state that they have felt pressured by their administration to use the materials from Sandel’s course. The administration denies exerting any such pressure. Whatever the truth of the matter, that is an issue of academic freedom, and not about the pedagogical merits of using MOOCs and other online materials. I certainly agree that professors should be, responsible for the content and pedagogy in their own courses.
The real issue, then, is whether the availability and use of online materials, whether through MOOCs or through other channels, is a threat to quality education, especially at public universities. Many of the arguments presented in the letter presuppose an either/or, all-or-nothing approach when it comes to face-to-face versus online teaching. But the whole point of a hybrid, or blended, course is that it combines both. And it is difficult to see why it makes a great deal of difference whether the online content is delivered via a MOOC or not.
Nothing will ever replace the face-to-face discussions that occur in the classroom. But in many traditional, on-campus courses, little discussion occurs. In a lecture course with hundreds, or even just scores, of students, much of the time in the classroom is inevitably spent with the professor lecturing and the students(hopefully)taking notes-or at least listening attentively. In courses with a significant lecture component, the advantages of using online lectures are undeniable. I know from my own experience that, if my attention wanes for a few moments, it is very convenient to simply go back and play a portion again. One can do the same if one doesn’t quite understand something the first time. And one need not miss material to take a bathroom break.
The availability of high-quality online lectures is an opportunity to rethink how we spend our time in the classroom. If an online lecture presents the material, or walks students through an argument, we are freed to spend more time discussing the aspects of the material that are most difficult-or most interesting. We can do other kinds of activities that we might not have time for if we felt obliged to present the material in the traditional way. Yes, hybrid courses usually involve less face-to-face time, but that time can be better and more effectively spent.
The crucial thing is that
the instructor remains in the driver’s seat
-and that takes us back to academic freedom. As long as individual professors are choosing what material to assign or recommend, running their in-class discussions and adding material that they think is not adequately covered in the online lectures, choosing the assignments and tests, and grading those tests, there is no threat to the professoriate, or to the quality of education at universities, public or otherwise.
According to the author, the two issues that should be first distinguished are______.
选项
A、academic freedom and content diversification
B、academic freedom and educational merits
C、administrative pressure and faculty responsibility
D、administrative pressure and teaching methodology
答案
B
解析
见第2段第4句“Whatever the truth…other online materials”,因此选B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/VsHsFFFM
本试题收录于:
BFT阅读题库国际化人才外语考试(BFT)分类
0
BFT阅读
国际化人才外语考试(BFT)
相关试题推荐
Youareaskedtowriteacompositioninwhichyougiveyourownopinionsonthefollowingtopic:
HereisanadvertisementaboutaBusinessBookClub.Readtheadvertisementandcompletethegiveninformationform.Wri
HereisanadvertisementaboutforacertainpositioninthenewspaperofDec.7,2005.Readtheadvertisementandcompletethe
Lookatthefollowingadvertisement.ChinaDailyWewouldliketohearyouropinionsaboutthe
Readthefollowingletterandcompletethegiveninformationform.Writeaword,phraseornumberinthespaces1-5.De
Readthefollowingtextanddecidewhichanswerbestfitseachspace.Forquestions26-45,markoneletterA,B,CorDony
Readthefollowingarticleandanswerquestions19-25.Forquestions19-25,choosethecorrectanswerA,B,CorD.Mark
Usingtheinformationinthetext,completeeachsentence14-18withanexpressionfromthelistbelow.Foreachsentence(14
Usingtheinformationinthetext,completeeachsentence14-18withanexpressionfromthelistbelow.Foreachsentence(14
Readthefollowingpassageanddecidewhichanswerbestfitseachspace.Forquestions26~45,markoneletterA,B,CorDo
随机试题
行车中当驾驶人意识到爆胎时,应在控制住方向的情况下,轻踏制动踏板,使车辆缓慢减速,逐渐平稳地停靠于路边。
A、原发性甲亢B、继发性甲亢C、两者都有D、两者都无腺体弥漫性对称性肿大______。
女患者,孕2月余,不慎摔伤,感轻度腰疫腹坠痛,阴道有少许出血。舌质正常,脉滑无力。治法是
患儿,男,l岁,1周前患上呼吸道感染,近2天仍发热,体温波动于38.5~39.5℃,烦躁,抽搐,脑膜刺激征阳性,拟“化脓性脑膜炎”收入院。为明确诊断,应进行以下哪项检查
评估公共建筑、公共设施用地,一般应首选()。
根据水闸承担的任务,下列水闸一般需具备双向过水能力的有()。
以下关于投资性房地产表述正确的有()。
根据资源税法律制度的规定,下列各项中不属于资源税征税范围的是()。
()是为了实现学校的培养目标而规定的所有学科总和及进程安排。
根据要求将SQL语句补充完整。(1)查询各系的学生数SELECT(1),COUNT(*)(2)GROUPBYDEPTNO;(2)更改课程号为C601的课程名为“大学物理”UPDATE(3)SET(4)(3)基于学生信息表,
最新回复
(
0
)