There are two main changes comparing with the past. First, there are new definitions of what man can achieve, of what a human st

admin2019-01-24  12

问题     There are two main changes comparing with the past. First, there are new definitions of what man can achieve, of what a human standard of life should be. In recent times this has been particularly true since technology has consistently broadened man’s potential, it has made a longer, healthier, better life possible. Thus, in terms of what is technically possible, we have higher aspirations. Those who suffer levels of life well below those that are possible, even though they live better than medieval knights (中世纪骑士) or Asian peasants, are poor.
    Related to this technological advance is the social definition of poverty. The American rich in Hong Kong or in the sixteenth century are poor here and now in the United States. They are dispossessed in terms of what the rest of the nations enjoy, in terms of what the society could provide if it had the will. They live on the fringe, the margin. They watch the movies and read the magazines of affluent (丰富的) American, and these will tell them that they are internal exiles.
    And finally, one of the reasons that the income figures show fewer people today with low incomes than 20 years ago is that more wives are working now, and family income has risen as a result. In 1940, 15% of wives were in the labor force; in 1957 the figure was 30%. This means that there was more money and, presumably, less poverty. Yet a tremendous growth in the number of the impoverishment of home life, of children who receive less care, love, and supervision. This one fact, for instance, might well play a significant role in the problems of the young in America. It could mean that we have made an improvement in income statistics at the cost of hurting thousands and thousands of children. If a person has money but achieves this through mortgaging the future, who is to say that he or she is no longer poor?
The so-called American poor can only be defined by________.

选项 A、technology
B、American social background
C、the living standard in the U. S.
D、the living standard of Hong Kong

答案C

解析 从文章第一段最后一句及第二段可知,美国所谓的穷人是以美国本身的生活水平来划分的。第二段第一句“对于贫穷的社会定义是和这种科技进步联系在一起的”,这里讲的是定义“贫穷”时需要考虑到科技进步的因素,因此科技只是影响“贫穷”的一个因素而不是决定因素,所以排除A;B项从字面上看讲得通,但文中未提到社会背景方面的内容,而且生活标准仅是社会背景的一个方面;D项“香港的生活标准”显然不对。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/StUGFFFM
本试题收录于: 英语题库成考专升本分类
0

最新回复(0)