2. 考研
  3. "The word ’protection’ is no longer taboo(禁忌语)." This short sentence, uttered by French President Nicolas Sarkozy late last mont

"The word ’protection’ is no longer taboo(禁忌语)." This short sentence, uttered by French President Nicolas Sarkozy late last mont

admin2013-11-29  101
问题     "The word ’protection’ is no longer taboo(禁忌语)." This short sentence, uttered by French President Nicolas Sarkozy late last month, may have launched a new era in economic history. Why? For decades, Western leaders have believed that lowering trade barriers and tariffs was a natural good. Doing so, they reasoned, would lead to greater economic efficiency and productivity, which in turn would improve human welfare. Championing free trade thus became a moral, not just an economic cause.
    These leaders, of course, weren’t acting out of unselfishness. They knew their economies were the most competitive, so they’d profit most from liberalization. And developing countries feared that their economies would be swamped by superior Western productivity. Today, however, the tables have turned—though few acknowledge it. The Western continues to preach free trade, but practices it less and less. Asia, meanwhile, continues to plead for special protection but practices more and more free trade.
    That’s why Sarkozy’s words were so important: he finally injected some honesty into the trade debate. The truth is that large parts of the West are losing faith in free trade, though few leaders admit it. Some economists are more honest. Paul Krugman is one of the few willing to acknowledge that protectionist arguments are returning. In the short run, there will be winners and losers under free trade. This, of course, is what capitalism is all about. But more and more of these losers will be in the West. Economists in the developed world used to love quoting Joseph Schumpeter, who said that "creative destruction" was an essential part of capitalist growth. But they always assumed that destruction would happen over there. When Western workers began losing jobs, suddenly their leaders began to lose faith in their principles. Things have yet to reverse completely. But there’s clearly a negative trend in Western theory and practice.
    A little hypocrisy(虚伪)is not in itself a serious problem. The real problem is that Western governments continue to insist that they retain control of the key global economic and financial institutions while drifting away from global liberalization. Look at what’s happening at the IMF(International Monetary Fund). The Europeans have demanded that they keep the post of managing director. But all too often, Western officials put their own interests above everyone else’s when they dominate these global institutions.
    The time has therefore come for the Asians — who are clearly the new winners in today’s global economy—to provide more intellectual leadership in supporting free trade. Sadly, they have yet to do so. Unless Asians speak out, however, there’s a real danger that Adam Smith’s principles, which have brought so much good to the world, could gradually die. And that would leave all of us worse off, in one way or another.
By "the tables have turned"(Line 4, Para. 2)the author implies that______.
选项 A、the Western leaders have turned self-centered
B、the Asian leaders have become advocates of free trade
C、the developed economies have turned less competitive
D、the developing economies have become more independent
答案C
解析 句意推断题如词义推断题一样，要借助上下文呈现的信息解答。本句出现在文章第二段第四句话，最值得关注的是本句开头有转折词however，这就提示我们本句句意与上文相反。上一句话是developing countries feared that their economies would be swamped by superior Western productivity．“发展中国家则害怕自身的经济被优越的西方经济所淹没”，同时句首的And表明该句内容与其前一句They knew their economies were the most competitive，so they’d profit most from liberalization并列。由此我们可以初步推断tables have turned暗示以下内容：1)西方经济不再是最具竞争性的；2)西方不再是自由化最大的受益者；3)发展中国家不再担心他们的经济被淹没。观察本题选项我们可以得知C选项符合1)信息，为本题答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/SPuRFFFM
0

考研英语二

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)