首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2017-03-25
45
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals.
The following aroused public resentment EXCEPT______.
选项
A、political power
B、high fares
C、economic loss
D、indifference
答案
C
解析
根据文中最后一段的“As the century wore on,public sentiment began to turn against the railroads against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals.”可知,随着该世纪的渐渐逝去,公众舆论开始不利于铁路公司开始反对它们在经济和政治上的权力、高票价以及它们对个人的冷漠无情。据此可知,引起公众不满的因素中不包括经济损失,C项正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/SMyYFFFM
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
DoingaPhDiscertainlynotforeverybody,andIdonotrecommenditformostpeople.However,IamreallygladIgotmyPhDra
Becausealcoholisasolvent,itisacomponentofmanyliquidmedicines.
Anumberofresearchershaveexaminedthevariables/strategiesthataffectstudents’learningEnglishasasecondlanguage.This
WiththeUSeconomyslowingdown,layoffsareeverywhere.Noindustryisspared.Ifyouenduphavingtostartover,inaddition
Inrecentyearstherehasbeena______increaseinthecostofliving,manyfamilieshavetodependonthefederalaids.
ThestudyoflawhasbeenrecognizedforcenturiesasabasicintellectualdisciplineinEuropeanuniversities.However,onlyin
CrossingWesleyanUniversity’scampususuallyrequireswalkingovercolorfulmessageschalkedontheground.Theycanbeasinno
Thepresident’s____remarksinhisspeechmetwithalotofattacksfromothercountries.
SinceJapan______importancetoeducationandtechnologicalinnovation,itseconomyhasdevelopedatahighspeed.
Hismagnificenthouseisthe______ofallhisfriends.
随机试题
电子商务导致企业组织结构重组呈现的趋势是
亲和素与生物素结合的特点
不属于医院感染的是
X线球管焦点大小常以1.0、0.6等值标注。其值称为
以下关于心理应激的说法错误的是
牙本质—牙髓复合体的关键部分是
下列有关法律解释的说法中,哪些选项是正确的?()
赎回费率不得超过基金份额赎回金额的()。
一般资料:求助者,女性,28岁,中学教师。案例介绍:求助者由于与丈夫发生矛盾,烦躁,失眠三个多月。下面是心理咨询师与求助者之间的一段咨询对话:心理咨询师:您好!请问我能为您提供什么帮助呢?求助者:我最近心情不好,烦躁。心理咨询师:您能谈谈是什么事
A、$3.00.B、$13.00.C、$30.00.D、$33.00.C男士在填单时问了一句:“多少钱一晚?”女士回答“30美元”,可知正确答案为C项。
最新回复
(
0
)