首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
On average, American kids aged 3 to 12 spent 29 hours a week in school, eight hours more than they did in 1981. They also did mo
On average, American kids aged 3 to 12 spent 29 hours a week in school, eight hours more than they did in 1981. They also did mo
admin
2018-05-09
39
问题
On average, American kids aged 3 to 12 spent 29 hours a week in school, eight hours more than they did in 1981. They also did more household work and participated in more of such organized activities as soccer and ballet (芭蕾舞). Involvement in sports, in particular, rose almost 50% from 1981 to 1997: boys now spend an average of four hours a week playing sports; girls log half that time. All in all, however, children’s leisure time dropped from 40% of the day in 1981 to 25%.
"Children are affected by the same time crunch (危机) that affects their parents," says Sandra Hofferth, who headed the recent study of children’s timetable. A chief reason, she says, is that more mothers are working outside the home. (Nevertheless, children in both double-income and "male breadwinner" households spent comparable amounts of time interacting with their parents, 19 hours and 22 hours respectively. In contrast, children spent only 9 hours with their single mothers.)
All work and no play could make for some very messed-up kids. "Play is the most powerful way a child explores the world and learns about himself," says T. Berry Brazelton, professor at Harvard Medical School. Unstructured play encourages independent thinking and allows the young to negotiate their relationships with their peers, but kids aged 3 to 12 spent only 12 hours a week engaged in it.
The children sampled spent a quarter of their rapidly decreasing "free time" watching television. But that, believe it or not, was one of the findings parents might regard as good news. If they’re spending less time in front of the TV set, however, kids aren’t replacing it with reading. Despite efforts to get kids more interested in books, the children spent just over an hour a week reading. Let’s face it, who’s got the time?
The author is concerned about the fact that American kids _____.
选项
A、are engaged in more and more structured activities
B、are increasingly neglected by their working mothers
C、are spending more and more time watching TV
D、are involved less and less in household work
答案
A
解析
观点态度题。文章一开头作者就说孩子们比1981年时上学的时间每周多8小时,他们还做更多的家务,参加更多的有组织性的活动等等,而这些均是造成孩子们空闲时间越来越少的原因,而孩子们空闲时间少也正是作者忧虑的问题,故可推知本题选A。B是作者在第2段括号里反驳过的观点;C错在more and more time,而且作者对孩子看电视也不完全反对;孩子们事实上要做更多家务,故D错。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/RbRFFFFM
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
Inthe1960s,medicalresearchersThomasHolmesandRichardRahedevelopedachecklistofstressfulevents.Theyappreciatedthe
DevelopHealthyEatingHabitsinYourChildrenA)Whatdoyouthinkyourchildrenareservedatschool?Thechildrenwereser
KeepOurSeasCleanA)Bytheyear2050itisestimatedthattheworld’spopulationcouldhaveincreasedtoaround12billion
Onaverage,Americankidsages3to12spent29hoursaweekinschool,eighthoursmorethantheydidin1981.Theyalsodidmo
Manyofthepeoplewhoappearmostoftenandmostgloriouslyinhistorybooksaregreatconquerorsandgeneralsandsoldiers,wh
Manyofthepeoplewhoappearmostoftenandmostgloriouslyinhistorybooksaregreatconquerorsandgeneralsandsoldiers,wh
Manyofthepeoplewhoappearmostoftenandmostgloriouslyinhistorybooksaregreatconquerorsandgeneralsandsoldiers,wh
Anewanalysisoffederalmoneythatpublicschoolsreceiveforlow-incomestudentsshowsthatarecordnumberofthenation’ss
InAmericaalone,tippingisnowa$16billion-a-yearindustry.Consumersactingrationallyoughtnottopaymorethantheyhave
ProfessorSmithrecentlypersuaded35people,23ofthemwomen,tokeepadiaryofalltheirabsent-mindedactionsforafortnig
随机试题
简述人的自由而全面的发展的科学内涵和实现条件。
A、 B、 C、 D、 B
患者,女,29岁。既往肺结核病史2年。近1周来气急、胸闷,刺激性咳嗽。胸部X线平片显示左侧肋膈角变钝,估计胸腔积液的量至少有
活血药的归经是
下列不属于证券交易所交易系统的是()。
什么是美?这个问题看似十分简单,一朵花、一片晚霞、一首诗、一曲音乐,我们觉得美;穿的衣服,用的家具,我们都会用审美的眼光,来说它们美不美。但是【①】认真追问一下:究竟什么是美?我们【②】往往会瞠目结舌,不知所答。在对美进行追问的过程中,首先碰到的
设A为n阶非零矩阵,且A2=A,r(A)=r(0<r<n).求|5E+A|.
一个基本的企业电子商务的架构应该包括电子商务的基础框架、应用和(50)三个部分。
在VisualFoxPro中,属于表单方法的是
下面正确使用动态数组的是()。
最新回复
(
0
)