首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The Serious Risks of Rushing New Teacher Evaluation Systems A)One of the primary policy reforms now being employed in states and
The Serious Risks of Rushing New Teacher Evaluation Systems A)One of the primary policy reforms now being employed in states and
admin
2015-07-31
29
问题
The Serious Risks of Rushing New Teacher Evaluation Systems
A)One of the primary policy reforms now being employed in states and districts nationwide is teacher evaluation reform. Well-designed evaluations, which should include measures that capture both teacher practice and student learning, have great potential to inform and improve the performance of teachers and, thus, students. Furthermore, most everyone agrees that the previous systems were not really practical, failed to provide useful feedback, and needed replacement.
B)The attitude among many policymakers and advocates is that we must implement these systems and begin using them rapidly for decisions about teachers, while design flaws can be fixed later. However, we believe this attitude to be unwise. The risks of excessive haste are likely higher than whatever opportunity costs would be brought forth by proceeding more cautiously. Moving too quickly gives policymakers and educators less time to devise and test the new systems, and to become familiar with how they work and the results they provide.
C)Moreover, careless rushing may result in avoidable erroneous high-stakes decisions about individual teachers. Such decisions are harmful to the profession, they threaten the credibility of the evaluations, and they may well promote widespread resistance.
D)Finally, we must not underestimate the costs, financial and otherwise, of making large changes to these systems once they are in place. A perfect example is No Child Left Behind— it had many obvious design flaws that were known early on, but few of these have been corrected, even in states’ NCLB "flexibility" applications.
E)In short, given these risks and the difficulty of fairly and accurately measuring teacher effectiveness, it seems short-sighted to rush into full-blown implementation without ensuring that the new systems are up to the task.
F)To that end, we would like to highlight four issues to which states and districts must pay attention in the short term. The first is that the details of the evaluations, some of which may seem insignificant, in fact matter tremendously. Important choices include(but are not limited to): selecting measures, particularly for teachers in non-tested grades and subjects; reporting evaluation results to educators in a manner that is useful to their practice; ensuring accuracy in state data systems; choosing cut scores(if desired)to separate more and less effective educators; and designing scoring systems that preserve each measure’s intended importance, or "weight". All of these decisions are important, but even a quick glance of states’ new evaluation policies under the waivers(弃权,放弃)or Race to the Top highlights many decisions that contradict what little we know about effective teacher evaluation systems.
G)And, as is often the case with new policies, the flow of research in this area lags far behind the risky pace of policy making. For instance, a large number of states have chosen as their growth models for teacher evaluation a variant on what’s commonly called the "student growth percentile"(SGP)model. However, recent evidence suggests that value-added models can do a better job of leveling the playing field across classes. Similarly, the Measures of Effective Teaching project offered useful guidance for designing evaluation systems, but its results were released after many states and districts had already made these decisions.
H)A second issue is simple bad timing: The implementation of the Common Core standards and new Core-aligned assessments creates serious complications for new teacher evaluation systems. Perhaps the most important of these is that curriculum, standards, and assessments are not yet in sync(同步的,协调的). New York has recently experienced this issue, administering new assessments before teachers have been supported to implement the Common Core through curriculum materials. And, while the stated hope is that the tests, curricula, and standards will perfectly come into adjustment in a few years, if history is any guide this is far from guaranteed.
I)Doing evaluation reform and Common Core implementation at the same time may well be too much for states, districts, and schools to handle. Furthermore, evaluating teachers on the basis of tests that are not in line with what they are supposed to be teaching is a fundamentally invalid use of those data.
J)The third issue is the need for states to avoid being overly prescriptive. Most notably, many schools and districts have well established evaluation systems already in place, and it makes little sense to do away with these systems and force a state-enforced model. Similarly, districts should be given room to experiment with system design and with different ways to use the results for personnel decisions. The state’s optimal role may be to enforce a minimum standard for teacher evaluation, rather than enforcing a particular evaluation model statewide.
K)Fourth and finally, new evaluations—as with any major policy—require significant time and resources to plan and experiment, and there must be substantial capacity building for educators to understand and carry out these systems. Policies should not move directly from the drawing board to high-stakes(高风险的)implementation if the goal is to bring the policies’ effectiveness into full play and minimizing(最小化)their negative unintended consequences. We recommend that schools and districts should have a year for planning and two years of implementation prior to tying ratings to high stakes decisions.
L)We conclude where we began—as two individuals who believe that improved teacher evaluation systems could indeed help elevate teaching and learning in US schools. We are concerned that the overly quick, insufficiently careful manner in which many new systems are being installed threatens their likelihood of success.
M)Put simply, we need to slow down and work to create the best systems possible. Schools and districts in the middle of the design and implementation process should focus on the details of their systems and partner with researchers and other sites to study system effectiveness. In those places where evaluations are already in force, we would strongly advise policymakers to take a step back and consider our suggestions.
N)And, no matter the situation, high-stakes decisions about teachers should not be made on the basis of assessment data collected during Common Core implementation. Doing so is unfair and inappropriate and may cause serious harm.
The new systems may be less likely to be a success if they are made and implemented quickly and carelessly.
选项
答案
L
解析
同义转述题。定位句表明,作者认为许多新的体制由于实施得过于迅速和鲁莽,很可能会达不到预期的效果。题干中的quickly and carelessly是对原文中the overly quick,insufficiently careful的同义转述,故选L)。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/RP3FFFFM
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
Theargumentthatglobalwarmingiscausingmoreextremeweatherisproblematicbecauseitpresumestheglobeiswarming.Infac
A、Hewasnotsurewhetherthewomanknewherinterestsorexpectation.B、Hewouldliketoknowsomethingfirstbeforegivingsom
Ifyouaretryingtodoyourbitforsustainabilityandsavewaterbytakingshortershowers,thenanewreportonsustainabilit
Fatterpeoplearemorelikelytolosetheirmemoriesandbrainpowerquickerthanthosewhoarethinner,accordingtoBritishre
A、Giveperformances.B、Watchpuppetmaking.C、Seedinosaurmodels.D、Lookatrockcollections.B选项均为以原形动词开头表明,本题可能考查行为动作。短文中提到……
Almosteverychild,onthefirstdayhesetsfootinaschoolbuilding,issmarter,more【B1】______,lessafraidofwhathedoesn
Globalwarmingisatrendtowardwarmerconditionsaroundtheworld.Partofthewarmingisnatural;wehaveexperienceda20,00
A、Trysomeherbalplants.B、Gotothebeautysalon.C、Haveacosmeticsurgery.D、Putsomecucumbersonhisface.A
A、Itishelpfulforthestudentstoknowthemselves.B、Itishelpfultocreateabalancedschoolcurriculum.C、Thestudentsshou
A、Theycoulddrivetheinsectsaway.B、Theycouldkeeptheplantswell-watered.C、Theycouldmaketheplantsgrowfaster.D、They
随机试题
A.竹茹B.天南星C.皂荚D.天竺黄治疗痰热惊搐、中风痰壅的药物是
得益于知识经济与网络技术的不断发展,思科于2001年成为当时全球市值最高的公司。随后几年,思科不断并购,公司规模持续扩大。为了应对规模扩张带来的“大企业病”,思科采取扁平化组织结构,并精心设计了由不同部门的管理者组成的委员会系统。然而,委员会系统决策迟缓,
组织中为周韧管状中柱的药材是组织中为无限外韧型维管束的药材是
下列关于仲裁协议的说法错误的是( )。
太林公司2011年收入和费用的相关内容如下表所示,该公司所得税税率为25%。计算太林公司2011年下列项目的金额。净利润()元。
某公司对甲省A县国家税务局的罚款处罚不服,决定申请行政复议,根据《行政复议法》的规定,某公司应当向()申请。
甲公司为上市公司,2010—2012年发生如下交易:(1)2010年5月2日,甲公司取得乙公司30%的股权,实际支付价款5400万元。当日,乙公司可辨认净资产公允价值为l8000万元。其中股本为10900万元,资本公积为3800万元,盈余公积为280万元,
教师的劳动特点主要体现在()。
当前软件测试的方法有3种:动态测试、静态测试、【】。
Unlikemostsports,whichevolvedovertimefromstreetgames,basketballwasdesignedbyonemantosuitaparticularpurpose.
最新回复
(
0
)