首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warming against generalizing. Each country is different, they say, and no one st
Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warming against generalizing. Each country is different, they say, and no one st
admin
2012-10-23
43
问题
Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warming against generalizing. Each country is different, they say, and no one story fits all of Asia. This is, of course, silly: all of these economies plunged into economic crisis within a few months of each other, so they must have had something in common.
In fact, the logic of catastrophe was pretty much the same in Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and South Korea. (Japan is a very different story.) In each case investors-mainly, but not entirely, foreign banks who had made short-term loans-all tried to pull their money out at the same time. The result was a combined banking and currency crisis a banking crisis because no bank can convert all its assets into cash on short notice; a currency crisis because panicked investors were trying not only to convert long-term assets into cash, but to concert baht or rupiah into dollars. In the face of the stampede, governments had no good options. If they let their currencies plunge, inflation would soar and companies that had borrowed in dollars would go bankrupt; if they tried to support their currencies by pushing up interest rates, the same firms would probable go bust from the combination of debt burden and recession. In practice, countries split the difference and paid a heavy price regardless.
Was the crisis a punishment for bad economic management? Like most clich6s, the catchphrase "crony capitalism" has prospered because it gets at something real; excessively cozy relationships between government and business really did lead to a lot of bad investments. The still primitive financial structure of Asian business also mad the economies peculiarly vulnerable to loss of confidence. But the punishment was surely disproportionate to the crime, and many investments that look foolish in retrospect seemed sensible at the time.
Given that there were no good policy options, was the policy response mainly on the right track? There was frantic blame-shifting when everything in Asia seemed to be going wrong: now there is a race to claim credit when some things have started to go right The International Monetary Fund points to Korea’s recovery-and more generally to the fact that the sky didn’t fall after all-as proof that its policy recommendations were right Never mind that other IMF clients have done far worse, and that the economy of Malaysia-which refused IMF help, and horrified respectable opinion by imposing capital controls-also seems to be on the mend; Malaysia’s Prime Minister, by contrast, claims full credit for any good news-even though neighboring economies also seem to have bottomed out
The truth is that an observer without any ax to grind would probably conclude that none of the policies adopted either on or in defiance of the IMF’s advice made much difference either way. Budget policies, interest ate policies, banking reform-whatever countries tried, just about all the capital that could flee, did. And when there was no more money to run, the natural recuperative powers of the economies finally began to prevail. At best, the money doctors who purported to offer cures provided a helpful bedside manner, at worst, they were like medieval physicians who prescribed bleeding as a remedy for all ills.
Will the patients stage a full recovery? It depends on exactly what you mean by "full". South Korea’s industrial production is already above its pre-crisis level, but in the spring of 1997 anyone who had predicted zero growth in Korea industry over the next two years would have been regarded as a reckless doomsayer. So if by recovery you mean not just a return to growth, but one that brings the region’s performance back to something like what people used to regard as the Asian norm, they have a long way to go.
The writer thinks that those Asian countries______.
选项
A、well deserved the punishment
B、invested in a senseless way at the time
C、were unduly punished in the crisis.
D、had bad relationships between government and business.
答案
C
解析
根据本文第三段后面的“But the punishment was surely disproportionate to the crime”可知,作者认为那些亚洲国家遭受的惩罚是过重的。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/QyHYFFFM
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Theappearanceoftheusedcaris______,it’smuchnewerthanitreallyis.
Inthispart,youarerequiredtowriteacompositionentitledOnBuildingaHarmoniousSocietyinnolessthan200words.Your
Thinkofallthecriminalswhohavekilled,allthesoldierswhohavekilled;considerthemassmurderofJewsinNaziGermany.
Itisimpossibleto______thesepointsofview;theyaretoodifferent.
(Applicants)willbeconsidered(providedthat)theirfiles(arecomplete)(dueto)thedeadline.
Don’tmeddleinmyaffairs,andinfactaIcanhandlethemproperlybymyself.
Theconceptofpersonalchoiceinrelationtohealthbehaviorsisanimportantone.Anestimated90percentofallillnessesmay
Forgatheringdataaboutindividualsorgroupsatdifferentdevelopmentallevels,researcherscanusetwo.relatedresearchdesi
Accordingtolegend,DanielWebstermadea______withSatan,butmanagedtotalkhiswayoutofitatthelastmoment.
(While)expertsinbasicscienceareimportant,(skilledtalents)shouldbethe(overriding)majoritysincetheyare(atheavyd
随机试题
女性,32岁,产后7个月发现腹壁一隆起型肿块,约5cm,质硬,病变界限不清,镜下长形纤细的梭形细胞增生,无明显异型性,周围有数量不等的血管。关于此病,下列说法错误的是
正常的血浆渗透压为
甲(男,17岁)在公园发现乙(男)和丙(女)发生性关系,即冒充公安人员进行干预。先将乙骗到一僻静处,又回来“讯问”丙,并从丙身上搜取100元,后将丙强奸。甲的父亲发现甲的钱来路不明,经追问,甲交代了抢劫丙100元的事实。甲父亲即带领甲到公安机关投案,甲只交
冬期施工开挖路堑表层冻土时,对于1m以下的冻土层可选用( )。
下列关于股票价值估值的描述,正确的是()。
下列事由,根据《国家行政机关公文处理办法》的规定,不可以使用“决定”的是()。
试论从犯的构成特征及其刑事责任。
某产品有一等品、二等品和不合格品三种,若在一批产品中一等品件数和二等品件数的比是5:3,二等品件数和不合格品件数的比是4:1,则该批产品的不合格品率约为().
某单位共有A、B、C三个部门,三部门人员平均年龄分别为38岁,24岁,42岁,A和B两部门人员平均年龄为30岁,B和C两部门人员平均年龄为34岁,该单位全体人员的平均年龄为()岁.
Wearerapidlyneartheendofthiscourseinthehistoryofclassicalmusic.Wehavecoveredseveral【B1】______.inaveryshor
最新回复
(
0
)