Royal Mail could be made to accept further controls on stamp prices as part of an inquiry announced by the communications watchd

admin2018-06-06  22

问题     Royal Mail could be made to accept further controls on stamp prices as part of an inquiry announced by the communications watchdog. Ofcom said it would carry out a "fundamental review" of how it regulates Royal Mail to make sure the company maintains its obligation to deliver to all parts of the country. The regulator decided to undertake the review after Whistl, Royal Mail’s only national competitor for direct delivery of letters, pulled out of the market.
    Whistl, formerly known as TNT and owned by Dutch private postal group PostNL, suspended deliveries last month and withdrew permanently from the market on 10 June. It had planned to expand beyond its existing network in west London, Liverpool and Manchester to deliver to a quarter of the U. K.
    Ofcom said it was concerned that without competition for letter delivery, Royal Mail might fail to make itself more efficient, threatening the universal postal service in the long run. One of the options is to introduce additional controls on the prices Royal Mail charges for its service. After Ofcom gave it greater commercial freedom in 2012, Royal Mail increased the price of first-and second-class stamps by 14p to 60p and 50p respectively.  Prices rose to 63p for first class and 54p for second class in March.
    Royal Mail shares fell 1% to 500p in afternoon trading. Ofcom said: "The review will ensure regulation remains appropriate and sufficient to secure the universal postal service, given the recent withdrawal by Whistl from the ’direct delivery’ letters market, which has resulted in Royal Mail no longer being subject to national competition."
    "Ofcom will consider...whether Royal Mail’s wholesale and retail prices are both affordable and sufficient to cover the costs of the universal service and whether Royal Mail’s commercial flexibility remains appropriate in the changing market. And, if not, whether wholesale or retail charge controls might be appropriate."
    David Kerstens, an analyst at the stockbroker Jefferies, said further curbs on Royal Mail’s charges could make the company less profitable as people post fewer letters. He said: "Stamp prices in the U. K. are at the low end of the spectrum compared with other countries across Europe. A control on pricing would be negative for Royal Mail because they won’t be able to offset volume pressure to the same extent that some of their peers in Europe are able to do."
    Dave Ward, general secretary of the Communication Workers Union, accused Ofcom of interfering with its members’ relations with Royal Mail. He said: "Royal Mail is efficient and postal workers are some of the most productive in the U. K. Ofcom has overstepped its remit in criticising terms and conditions and a regulator should not be using efficiency to drive down employment standards."
David Kerstens believes that the further control on the price ______.

选项 A、could make less people post letters in communication
B、could cause the stamp prices the lowest across Europe
C、could cause adverse effects for the business of Royal Mail
D、could make Royal Mail less competitive than their Euro peers

答案C

解析 细节题。根据题干直接定位到第六段最后一句:A control on pricing would be negative for Royal Mail...其中negative=adverse; Royal Mail=the business of Royal Mail。选项是完美的同义替换。A项选项:没有这个因果关系,对于价格的控制不会造成人们少用信件,人们本身已经用得很少了。B项选项:价格控制也不会导致邮票价格降到最低,因为邮票价格现在已经是最低的了。D项选项:该项干扰性最强,这个比较是没有的,文章没有就二者的竞争力进行过比较,因为我们都不知道他们之间是否有竞争关系。而且C项是肯定正确且最佳的选项。你为什么不选呢?D项选项即使是正确的,也不是最佳的!
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/Qn57FFFM
0

最新回复(0)