首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Read the following extract from an article about Over-Capacity in the Car Business. For each question 15—20, mark one letter(A,
Read the following extract from an article about Over-Capacity in the Car Business. For each question 15—20, mark one letter(A,
admin
2013-08-22
23
问题
Read the following extract from an article about Over-Capacity in the Car Business.
For each question 15—20, mark one letter(A, B. C, or D)on your Answer Sheet for the answer you choose.
Since the days of Henry Ford’s dominance of the car market in the 1920s up to the present day, the car industry has continued to grow. Some companies, such as British Leyland, failed to survive the turbulent business world of the 1970s despite being government-owned. During the 1960s and 1970s, as growth in profit became more difficult to achieve due to increased competition, mainly from the Japanese, the industry turned to efficient production methods in order to create a competitive advantage. However, once all the major players in the industry had become as efficient as possible, developing a cost advantage was more difficult to achieve. In addition, car companies from Asia, such as Daewoo, Samsung and Kia, have developed cheaper, more affordable alternatives for the discerning western buyers. Such car companies are part-funded by their respective governments but enjoy considerably lower labor costs.
Increasing productive capacity has led to car companies aiming to use economies of scale as the main way of reducing cost, although this has unfortunately led to businesses having surplus capacity. This spare capacity occurs when the industry as a whole expands ahead of, or in anticipation of, a growth in customer demand. Such growth in capacity has meant that supply outstrips demand by some 30% , i.e. , car companies could cut back on their capacity levels by 30%, and still meet all customer demands.
The result has been a series of joint agreements and mergers between car companies, with a view to either using capacity, or losing capacity altogether by selling off parts of a business. The other problem is the high cost of developing new vehicles: the standard response to the high cost is to either rejuvenate or re-launch old vehicles with new technology. But there are enough companies developing new models that any business, which does not, stands to lose out. The main fear in the car industry is over-capacity—experts predict that by 2001, the industry may produce 23 million cars more than it can sell!
In 1998 there was a spate of company mergers—e.g. In January 1999, Ford paid £4 billion for Volvo’s car division(Volvo claimed that it needed economies of scale, allowing it to focus on buses, engines and aerospace and to acquire shares in two major truck-making businesses. Ford intended to distribute Volvos with its own cars and hoped to use Volvo’s reputation for technological excellence to develop new cars, using common research platforms to save money.
Renault, on the other hand, announced a joint agreement with Nissan, the debt-ridden Japanese company, to purchase a 37% stake. For Renault, the problem was not over-capacity, but rather the lack of product range. Renault was 44% owned by the French government, which obviously wanted to protect one of its major companies and wealth creators. However, Renault had concentrated its major marketing effort on domestic demand in Francejas the domestic market fell, profit tumbled. The expiry in 1999 of the "gentlemen’s agreement" which limited car sales from Japan was probably the main reason for teaming up with Nissan. Nissan, however, had borrowed approximately £ 15 billion in order to expand its productive capacity and had lost money in six of the last seven years. One estimate put 1998’s losses at nearly £ 1 billion. The cost savings for both companies are not likely to occur until 2002, resulting mainly from purchasing economies of scale. Renault seems to have got caught between the large manufacturers who achieve economies of scale and the smaller specialist manufacturers.
What is the main reason for Renault’s joint agreement with Nissan?
选项
A、The expiry of the "gentlemen’s agreement".
B、Because Renault wanted to help Nissan out of the hard situation.
C、Because Nissan had very good reputation for technological excellence.
D、Because Renault was 44% owned by the French government.
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/QGFsFFFM
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
NegotiationYourcompanywilldobusinesswithanotherforeigncompany.Sinceitisthefirsttimetodobusinesswiththatc
(Thecandidatechoosesonetopicandspeaksaboutitforoneminute.)A.Careerdevelopment:theimportanceofacquiringarange
Inthispartofthetest,youareaskedtogiveashorttalkonabusinesstopic.Youhavetochooseoneofthetopicsfromthe
Askingquestions征询
Tellingyouraudiencethattheycanaskquestions请听众提问
•Youwillhearadiscussionbetweentwoseniormanagers,JohnandDeborah,aboutanassistantmanager,Colin,whohasappliedf
TaskOne-Job•Forquestions13-17,matchtheextractswiththepeople,listedA-H.•Foreachextract,choosethejobeachsp
•Readthetextbelowaboutthelogistics.•Inmostofthelines41-52thereisoneextraword.Itiseithergrammaticallyinco
随机试题
行车中遇抢救伤员的救护车从本车道逆向驶来时,要怎样做?
外来原始凭证包括()
Mostyoungpeopleenjoyphysicalactivities,walking,cycling,football,ormountaineering.Thesewhohaveapassion【C1】____
Almosteveryonehasahobby.Ahobbycanbe【C1】______peopleliketodointheirsparetime.Ahobbycan【C2】______themwithinter
症见猝然心痛如绞,心痛彻背,喘不得卧,多因气候骤冷或骤感风寒而发病或加重,伴形寒,甚则手足不温,冷汗自出,胸闷气短,心悸,面色苍白,苔薄白,脉沉紧,治法为
按照新的财务制度和企业会计准则,新增资产按()可分为固定资产、流动资产、无形资产和其他资产等四大类。
随着技术进步,智能测量仪表以()为核心获得了高速发展和应用。
张老师撰写了一篇学术论文,拟投稿于大学学报,发表之前需要根据学报要求完成论文样式排版。根据考生文件夹下“Word素材.docx”完成排版工作,具体要求如下:设置论文正文部分的页面布局为对称2栏,并设置正文段落(不含图、表、独立成行的公式)字号为五号,中
一般说来,数字化声音的质量越高,则要求()。
様々な苦難に()、あきらめないで最後までやりぬいた。
最新回复
(
0
)