首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Many United States companies have, unfortunately, made the search for legal protection from import competition into a major line
Many United States companies have, unfortunately, made the search for legal protection from import competition into a major line
admin
2011-12-20
55
问题
Many United States companies have, unfortunately, made the search for legal protection from import competition into a major line of work. Since 1980 the United States international Trade Commission (ITC) has received about 280 complaints alleging damage from imports that benefit from subsidies by foreign governments. Another 340 charge that foreign companies "dumped" their products in the United States at "less than fair value. " Even when no unfair practices are alleged, the simple claim that an industry has been injured by imports is sufficient grounds to seek relief.
Contrary to the general impression, this quest for import relief has hurt more companies than it has helped. As corporations begin to function globally, they develop an intricate web of marketing, production, and research relationships. The complexity of these relationships makes it unlikely that a system of import relief laws will meet the strategic needs of all the units under the same parent company. Suppose a United States-owned company establishes an overseas plant to manufacture a product while its competitor makes the same product in the United States. If the competitor can prove injury from the imports—and that the United States company received a subsidy from a foreign government to build its plant abroad—the United States company’s products will be uncompetitive in the United States, since they would be subject to duties.
Perhaps the most brazen ease occurred when the ITC investigated allegations that Canadian companies were injuring the United States salt industry by dumping rock salt, used to de-ice roads. The bizarre aspect of the complaint was that a foreign conglomerate with" United States operations was crying for help against a United States company with foreign operations. The "United States" company claiming injury was a subsidiary of a Dutch conglomerate, while the "Canadian" companies included a subsidiary of a Chicago firm that was the second-largest domestic producer of rock salt.
According to the passage, the International Trade Commission is involved in which of the following?
选项
A、Investigating allegations of unfair import competition
B、Granting subsidies to companies in the United States that have been injured by import competition
C、Recommending legislation to ensure fair trade
D、Identifying international corporations that wish to build plants in the United States
答案
A
解析
文章最后一段提到investigated allegations。B项Granting subsidies市政府的工作。C、D项在文章中没有提到。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/QDwUFFFM
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
bequalifiedasalegalperson
theEUsinglemarket
Onanypersonwhodesiressuchqueerprizes,NewYorkwillbestowthegiftoflonelinessandthegiftofprivacy.Itisthislar
directinvestment
()referstothestudyofsocialaspectsoflanguageanditsrelationwithsociety.
TheJapanesedollar-buyingmakestraderseagerto______dollarsinfearofanothergovernmentintervention.
Theideaofabalanceddietisverydifficulttoput______tosomeonewhoknowsnothingaboutfoodvalues.
Thevalueofheatforthepreservationoffoodhasbeenknownforthousandsofyears,butitwasnotrealizeduntilthenineteen
Itisnotcompatiblewiththeegalitarianidealthatthereshouldbesharpdifferencesinthescaleofmonetaryrewardforservi
Low-levelslash-and-bumfarmingdoesn’tharmrainforest.Onthecontrary,ithelpsfarmersandimprovesforestsoils.Thisisth
随机试题
GK—G04.型光终端机最多可提供4个2.048Mbit/s数字接口。()
下列主张能够得到法律支持的是()
《天净沙.秋思》景物描写的主要顺序是()
碘过敏实验不包括
甲、乙、丙3支试管,分别注入同体积的0.1mol/L的盐酸、硫酸和醋酸,再各加入同浓度等体积的氢氧化钠溶液,现测得甲试管中溶液的pH为7,则
关于需求的交叉弹性,正确的有()。
“窗含西岭千秋雪,门泊东吴万里船”道出漏景效果。()
情绪和情感是人对客观事物是否符合()而产生的态度体验。
甲、乙两人各进行3次射击,甲每次击中目标的概率为,乙每次击中目标的概率为,则甲恰好比乙多击中目标2次的概率是[].
择业是指个人根据自己的意愿和社会的需要,主动选择自己所从事的工作的过程。大学生在对待职业的问题上,必须明确成才的必要条件是()
最新回复
(
0
)