首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
It’s widely known that more than half of all corporate mergers and acquisitions end in failure. Like many marriages, they are of
It’s widely known that more than half of all corporate mergers and acquisitions end in failure. Like many marriages, they are of
admin
2017-12-31
42
问题
It’s widely known that more than half of all corporate mergers and acquisitions end in failure. Like many marriages, they are often fraught with irreconcilable cultural and financial differences. Yet M&A activity was up sharply in 2013 and reached pre-recession levels this year. So why do companies keep at it? Because it’s an easy way to make a quick buck and please Wall Street.
Increasingly, business is serving markets rather than markets serving business, as they were originally meant to do in our capitalist system.
For a particularly stark example, consider American pharmaceutical giant Pfizer’s recent bid to buy British drugmaker AstraZeneca. The deal made little strategic sense and would probably have destroyed thousands of jobs as well as slowed research at both companies.(Public outcry to that effect eventually helped scuttle the plan.)Rut it would have allowed Pfizer to shift its domicile to Britain, where companies pay less tax. That, in turn, would have boosted share prices in the short term, enriching the executives paid in stock and the bankers, lawyers and other financial intermediaries who stood to gain about half a billion dollars or so in fees from the deal.
Pfizer isn’t alone. Plenty of firms engage in such tax wizardry. This kind of short-term thinking is starting to dominate executive suites. Besides tax avoidance. Wall Street’s marching orders to corporate America include dividend payments and share buybacks, which sap long-term growth plans. It also demands ever more globalized supply chains, which make balance sheets look better by cutting costs but add complexity and risk. All of this hurts longer-term, more sustainable job and value creation. As a recent article on the topic by academic Gautam Mukunda in the Harvard Business Review noted, "The financial sector’s influence on management has become so powerful that a recent survey of chief financial officers showed that 78% would give up economic value and 55% would cancel a project with a positive net present value—that is, willingly harm their companies—to meet Wall Street’s targets and fulfill its desire for ’smooth’ earnings. "
Some of this can be blamed on the sheer size of the financial sector. Many thought that the economic crisis and Great Recession would weaken the power of markets. In fact, it only strengthened finance’s grip on the economy. The largest banks are bigger than they were before the recession, while finance as a percentage of the economy is about the same size. Overall, the industry earns 30% of all corporate profit while creating just 6% of the country’s jobs. And financial institutions are still doing plenty of tricky things with our money. Legendary investor Warren Buffett recently told me he’s steering well clear of exposure to commercial securities like the complex derivatives being sliced and diced by major banks. He expects these "weapons of mass destruction" to cause problems for our economy again at some point.
There’s a less obvious but equally important way in which Wall Street distorts the economy: by defining "shareholder value" as short-term returns. If a CEO misses quarterly earnings by even a few cents per share, activist investors will push for that CEO to be fired. Yet the kinds of challenges companies face today—how to shift to entirely new digital business models, where to put operations when political risk is on the rise, how to anticipate the future costs of health, pensions and energy— are not quarterly problems. They are issues that will take years, if not decades, to resolve. Unfortunately, in a world in which the average holding period for a stock is about seven months, down from seven years four decades ago, CEOs grasp for the lowest-hanging fruit. They label tax-avoidance schemes as "strategic" and cut research and development in favor of sending those funds to investors in the form of share buybacks.
All of this will put American firms at a distinct disadvantage against global competitors with long-term mind-sets. McKinsey Global Institute data shows that between now and 2025, 7 out of 10 of the largest global firms are likely to come from emerging markets, and most will be family owned businesses not beholden to the markets. Of course, there’s plenty we could do policy-wise to force companies and markets to think longer term—from corporate tax reform to bans on high-speed trading to shifts in corporate compensation. But just as Wall Street has captured corporate America, so has it captured Washington. Few mainstream politicians on either side of the aisle have much interest in fixing things, since they get so much of their financial backing from the Street. Unfortunately for them, the fringes of their parties—and voters—do care.
Why does the author say that "Increasingly, business is serving market rather than markets serving business"(para. 1)? What is the paradox behind such a situation?
选项
答案
common sense + knowledge: financial markets are established to serve business/ with the development of today’s financial market / the opposite situation occurs / use M&A as an easy way "to make a quick buck and please Wall ’street" / manufacturing industry develops/grows with financial market as the focus / paradoxical: originally, the purpose of financial institutions is to provide funds to support and develop manufacturing industry/ today financial units are trying all kinds of means to gain more profits for itself
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/PQCYFFFM
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Thedaythissmalltowntolditsresidentstostopdrinkingthewater,lifeonGlendaleBoulevardturnedfromquiettoalarm
Thesecondlittlepigwasunlucky.Hebuilthishousefromsticks.Itwasblownawaybyahuffing,puffingwolf,whichpromptly
Neverunderestimatehowterrifiedmanypeoplearewhenfacedwiththeprospectofgoingintoasolicitor’soffice.
下面你将听到联合国秘书长接受有关奖项的一段讲话。Mr.Chairman,Excellencies,LadiesandGentlemen,Ishouldlike,firstofall,toonceagainthank
Iwouldliketocommentontherelationshipbetweenthegrowthoftheworldeconomyandtheroleofmacroeconomicpolicies.Let
下面你将听到的是一段有关经济发展的讲话。Iwouldliketocommentontherelationshipbetweenthegrowthoftheworldeconomyandtheroleofmac
下面你将听到联合国秘书长接受有关奖项的一段讲话。Mr.Chairman,Excellencies,LadiesandGentlemen,Ishouldlike,firstofall,toonceagainthank
Mr.President,LadiesandGentlemen,Ourworldisundergoingprofoundchanges.Peaceanddevelopmentremainthethemeofour
A、TwoTypesofStocksB、ANewStrategyofInvestmentC、DistinctionsbetweenTradingandInvestmentD、ConflictingPerspectiveson
Whichofthefollowingisconsideredalandmarkrulingininterracialmarriages?
随机试题
班集体是否成熟的重要标志是学生集体是否形成了()。
去甲肾上腺素与α受体结合后,哪种效应不会出现()。
碳水化合物的食物热效应约为本身产生能量的
以下应按照“财产转让所得”项目征收个人所得税的有()。
教学的基本任务是()。
奥苏贝尔认为在有意义学习的过程中原有观念对新观念加以同化的方式有()。
这次论坛旨在立足国家人口与健康事业的重大需求,借助战略性学术交流平台,___________高水准的科研合作团队,___________国际学术前沿,___________我国免疫学相关交叉学科未来发展的重要科学问题,促进免疫学与生命科学各学科及其他科学相
在窗体上有一个名为Text1的文本框和一个名为Command1的命令按钮,并编写有如下事件过程:PrivateSubCommand1Click()DimiAsInteger,nAsIntegerFori=0To50i=i+
以下叙述中正确的是
【H1】【H6】
最新回复
(
0
)