首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
职业资格
It’s one of the things we are most afraid might happen to us. We go to great lengths to avoid it. And yet we do it all the same.
It’s one of the things we are most afraid might happen to us. We go to great lengths to avoid it. And yet we do it all the same.
admin
2021-06-06
38
问题
It’s one of the things we are most afraid might happen to us. We go to great lengths to avoid it. And yet we do it all the same. That is, we marry the wrong person. So here is the question, why will we marry the wrong person?
For most of recorded history, people married for logical sorts of reasons: because her parcel of land adjoined yours, his family had a flourishing business, her father was the magistrate in town, there was a castle to keep up, or both sets of parents subscribed to the same interpretation of a holy text. And from such reasonable marriages, there flowed loneliness, infidelity, abuse, hardness of heart and screams heard through the nursery doors. The marriage of reason was not, in hindsight, reasonable at all; it was often expedient, narrow-minded, snobbish and exploitative. That is why what has replaced it—the marriage of feeling—has largely been spared the need to account for itself.
What matters in the marriage of feeling is that two people are drawn to each other by an overwhelming instinct and know in their hearts that it is right. Indeed, the more imprudent a marriage appears (perhaps it’s been only six months since they met; one of them has no job or both are barely out of their teens), the safer it can feel.
But though we believe ourselves to be seeking happiness in marriage, it isn’t that simple. What we really seek is familiarity—which may well complicate any plans we might have had for happiness. We are looking to recreate, within our adult relationships, the feelings we knew so well in childhood. The love most of us will have tasted early on was often confused with other more destructive dynamics: feelings of wanting to help an adult who was out of control, of being deprived of a parent’s warmth or scared of his anger, of not feeling secure enough to communicate our wishes. How logical, then, that we should as grown-ups find ourselves rejecting certain candidates for marriage not because they are wrong but because they are too right—too balanced, mature, understanding and reliable—given that in our hearts, such Tightness feels foreign. We marry the wrong people because we don’t associate being loved with feeling of happiness.
Finally, we marry to make a nice feeling permanent. We imagine that marriage will help us to bottle the joy we felt when the thought of proposing first came to us: Perhaps we were in Venice, on the lagoon, in a motorboat, with the evening sun throwing glitter across the sea, chatting about aspects of our souls no one ever seemed to have grasped before, with the prospect of dinner in a risotto place a little later. We married to make such sensations permanent but failed to see that there was no solid connection between these feelings and the institution of marriage.
The good news is that it doesn’t matter if we find we have married the wrong person. We mustn’t abandon him or her, only the founding romantic idea upon which the Western understanding of marriage has been based the last 250 years: that a perfect being exists who can meet all our needs and satisfy our every yearning. We need to swap the romantic view for a tragic (and at points comedic) awareness that every human will frustrate, anger, annoy, madden and disappoint us—and we will (without any malice)
do the same to them
.
The person who is best suited to us is not the person who shares our every taste (he or she doesn’t exist), but the person who can negotiate differences in taste intelligently—the person who is good at disagreement. Rather than some notional idea of perfect complementarity, it is the capacity to tolerate differences with generosity that is the true marker of the "not overly wrong" person. Compatibility is an achievement of love; it must not be its precondition.
Which of the following is the key to a happy marriage according to the passage?
选项
A、Commonalities in every taste.
B、Mutual attraction at first sight.
C、Generosity in fixing differences.
D、Complementarity in most aspects.
答案
C
解析
细节题。A项“拥有共同的喜好”,B项“一见钟情”,C项“大度地解决分歧”,D项“在很多方面互补”。根据最后一段可知,真正适合自己的人不是和我们喜好都相同的人,而是能够大度地容忍差异的人。A项错误,C项正确。找到这样一个合适的人是一段幸福婚姻的关键。互补是爱情的成果,而非前提。D项错误。B项原文未提及。故本题选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/P7WiFFFM
本试题收录于:
英语学科知识与教学能力题库教师资格分类
0
英语学科知识与教学能力
教师资格
相关试题推荐
如果家长同意,可以把儿童带出去活动。()
一名美国入境游客,免税烟草制品限量是()。
全陪在接受旅游团的接待任务后,首先要(),以便提供针对性的服务。
对个体散客,以采取独白式的形式进行导游服务。()
有声音而无固定语义的语言指的是()。
Whichofthefollowingpairsofwordsaresynonyms?
It’soneofthethingswearemostafraidmighthappentous.Wegotogreatlengthstoavoidit.Andyetwedoitallthesame.
WhichofthefollowingactivitiesisNOTappropriatefordevelopingstudents’awarenessofdiscoursecoherence?
What’shappening:Withglobalpopulationlevelssettoreachcloseto10billionpeopleby2050,theecologicalimpactofth
Childrenwhospendmorethantwohoursadayatacomputerorwatchingtelevisionaremorelikelythanotherstohavementalpro
随机试题
材料12012年11月29日,习近平在参观《复兴之路》展览时,提出了实现中华民族伟大复兴的中国梦。他在十二届全国人大一次会议上的讲话中系统阐发了这个思想,在出访俄罗斯、非洲国家和出席亚洲博鳌论坛等讲话中又进一步作了论述。他深情指出:“现在,大家都在讨论
某镇花木同艺场对该镇政府注销其经营资格的决定不服,向某县政府申请复议,县政府作出限制其经营范围的决定。某镇花木园艺场仍不服,向法院起诉。下列哪一法院应为本案的管辖法院?()
【案例三】背景材料:某工程基坑深8m,支护采用桩锚体系,桩数共计200根,基础采用桩基础形式,桩数共计400根,毗邻基坑东侧12m处有密集居民区,居民区和基坑之间的道路下1.8m处埋设有市政管道。项目实施过程中发生如下事件:事
根据增值税法律制度的规定,下列各项中,不属于增值税征税范围的是( )
如果确定专家的工作不足以实现审计目的,注册会计师应当()。
对那些无理取闹的旅游者,导游人员可以冷落他们一段时间,当然该为他们服务时还得热情服务。()
想象冲击疗法适用于()。
农民至少应当占农民专业合作社成员总数的()。
在SQLServer2008中,能够出现在SELECT语句目标列中的用户自定义函数是【5】函数。
软件开发环境是全面支持软件开发全过程的______集合。
最新回复
(
0
)