首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2016-08-13
34
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such e-valuation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
In the author’s opinion, teachers can only be promoted depending on______.
选项
A、how well they give their lectures
B、how well they get along with the students
C、how many papers and books they have published
D、how well they conduct their academic researches
答案
A
解析
参考文章第、一段倒数第一句,“My point of view is…”,可推知作者的观点是A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/P5jGFFFM
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Animportantbusinessmanwasaskedtogiveatwenty-minutespeechinanothercity.Hewastoobusytowriteithimself,soheas
Tomwritesas______asherbrother.
IntheUS,peoplepreferwaitingforatabletosittingwithpeopletheydon’tknow.Thismeansahostessmaynotscatasmallg
Americansareproudoftheirvarietyandindividuality(个性),yettheyloveandrespectfewthingsmorethanauniform,whetheri
Oceanographyhasbeendefinedas"Theapplicationofallsciencestothestudyofthesea".Beforethenineteenthcentury,s
Oureatinghabitsareveryimportantforgoodhealthandastrongbody.Therearetimeswhenmostofuswouldrathereatsweets
Canadaisthesecondlargestcountryintheworldinarea,althoughits【1】isonlysome25million,most【2】ina200-milestrip【3】
UncleSamisatall,thinman.He’sanoldermanwithwhitehairandawhitebeard.Heoftenwearsatallhat,abowtie,andth
Thereis______sugar.Youneedn’tgotobuyany.
随机试题
在腹膜后隙内,右肾上腺三角由_______________、_______________和_______________围成,左肾上腺三角由_______________、_______________和_______________围成,肾上腺三角是寻
离心式压缩机的气量调节严禁使用出口阀来调节。
A、Janedoesnotlikedancing.B、Janeisnotavailable.C、Jane’sleavingthedayaftertomorrow.D、Janewillgotodanceonher
患儿,男,5岁。发热1天,轻咳,家长给予磺胺类药物口服,次日热不退,头痛,全身出现弥漫性针尖样大小的红色皮疹若患儿3天后出现眼睑水肿,伴头痛、呕吐,最可能的并发症是
A、变态反应B、特异质反应C、副作用D、毒性反应E、后遗效应与药物的药理作用和剂量无关的反应为( )。
急性心肌梗死做核医学显像检查,检出率最高的时间是在发病后__________小时。
证券公司申请保荐机构资格,应符合保荐代表人资格条件的从业人员不少于()人。
AmazontodayunveiledDashButtons,aneasywayforcustomersto【C1】______selectbulkgoods【C2】______aninternet-connectedbut
容器
Ladiesandgentlemen,goodafternoon.Firstofall,letme【B1】______toyouforcomingtotheopeningceremonyofournewbranch
最新回复
(
0
)