首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
From The Tipping Point to Nudge, the rise of pop-social science has been a noticeable feature of the past decade in publishing.
From The Tipping Point to Nudge, the rise of pop-social science has been a noticeable feature of the past decade in publishing.
admin
2012-07-06
24
问题
From The Tipping Point to Nudge, the rise of pop-social science has been a noticeable feature of the past decade in publishing. Not everyone is impressed. I recently interviewed a professor of education who is an expert in policy evaluation. She lamented the fact that politicians tend to get their facts from popular social science books containing inaccuracies.
I think the professor was right to worry about ministerial exposure to authors such as Malcolm Gladwell, Dan Ariely and even Tim Harford— but not for quite the right reasons. The problem is not that such authors are inaccurate. I’m not sure that they are. Gladwell has plenty of critics, but I find him a careful reporter. And I am told Tim Harford is all but infallible.
Yet infallibility is not enough. It’s perfectly possible for an author to do nothing but weave together credible, peer-reviewed research and yet produce a highly partial view of reality. Different pieces of research invariably point in different directions. Dan Ariely’s Predictably Irrational is full of examples of irrational behaviour. My own Logic of Life is full of examples of rational behaviour. Occasionally I am asked to explain the contradiction, but if there is a contradiction, it is a subtle one.
If Ariely describes a rainy day and I describe a sunny one, we are not really contradicting each other. We each offer our spin, but it’s really about whether most people expect sunshine or rain: Dan says that it’s rainier than we tend to think, while I say the sun shines more often than anyone would credit. A serious review of this metaphorical evidence would count up the rainy days and the sunny ones.
For real policy questions, such reviews exist. They are called systemic reviews. They should be the first port of call for anyone wanting to understand what works. But they are not exactly bestsellers in airport bookshops.
Quite apart from the fact that nobody wants to read all the evidence, there is a deep problem with the way evidence is selected throughout academia. Even a studiously impartial literature review will be biased towards published results. Many findings are never published because they just aren’t very intriguing. Alas, boring or disappointing evidence is still evidence. It is dangerous to discard it, but let’s not blame Malcolm Gladwell just because he doesn’t stick it on page one.
There’s a hierarchy of evidence here. The systemic review tries to track down unpublished research as well as what makes it into the journals. A less careful review will often be biased towards results that are interesting. A peer-reviewed article presents a single result, while a popular social-science book will highlight a series of results that tell a tale. The final selection mechanism is the reader, who will half-remember some findings and forget the rest.
Those of us who tell ourselves we are curious about the world are actually swimming in "evidence" that has been filtered again and again in favour of interestingness. It’s a heady and perhaps toxic drink, but we shouldn’t blame popularisers alone for our choice to dive in. [515 words]
The author might agree to the statement that______.
选项
A、publishers should produce less social science books
B、social science writers should enhance their accuracy
C、critics should discard their prejudice against pop social science writers
D、policy makers should not base their decisions on pop social science books
答案
D
解析
本题考查作者观点。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/KQ0RFFFM
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
Inourincreasinglycomplexworld,informationisbecomingthebasicbuildingblockofthesociety.(46)However,atatimewhen
Inourincreasinglycomplexworld,informationisbecomingthebasicbuildingblockofthesociety.(46)However,atatimewhen
Inthetwodecadesbetween1929and1949,sculptureintheUnitedStatessustainedwhatwasprobablythegreatestexpansionins
Inthetwodecadesbetween1929and1949,sculptureintheUnitedStatessustainedwhatwasprobablythegreatestexpansionins
ItcanbeinferredfromParagraph1thatoneimportantfactorintheincreasingimportanceofeducationintheUnitedStateswas
Weallknowthatscienceplaysanimportantroleinthesocietiesinwhichwelive.Manypeoplebelieve,however,thatourprogr
TheCaliforniancoastlinenorthandsouthofSiliconValleyisatrend-settingsortofplace.Increasingly,thehomeinteriorso
TheCaliforniancoastlinenorthandsouthofSiliconValleyisatrend-settingsortofplace.Increasingly,thehomeinteriorso
TheCaliforniancoastlinenorthandsouthofSiliconValleyisatrend-settingsortofplace.Increasingly,thehomeinteriorso
随机试题
以下不属于构成固定资产原值的费用有()
瓜蒌的功效有
依据马斯洛的五个需要层次论,人的最高需要层次为
流行性脑脊髓膜炎的传染源主要是
旋流絮凝池的适用条件有()。
若出口商品的木质包装已按要求实施熏蒸,商检机构对熏蒸后的木包装加盖了进口国认可的标识,在这种情况下,出口商同样需要商检机构出具《熏蒸/消毒证书》,以交进口商。()
某酒厂(增值税一般纳税人)生产销售粮食白酒、黄酒及其他酒。2012年3月份的生产经营情况如下:(1)从某农业生产者处收购粮食一批,开具的收购发票上注明价款20000元,另支付运费800元、装卸费200元,取得运输企业开具的货运发票。(2)从某增
你组织带队去某地考察。但是由于联系出现问题。对方拒绝你们参观。怎么办?
设n为正整数,在1与n+1之间插入n个正数,使这n+2个数成等比数列,则所插入的n个正数之积等于().
•Readthefollowinga~icleaboutteamworkandanswerthequestionsontheoppositepage.•Foreachquestion15-20,markon
最新回复
(
0
)