首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
7 Things You Can’t Say in Canada Attacking our sacred cows (things or people that cannot be criticized) may turn you into on
7 Things You Can’t Say in Canada Attacking our sacred cows (things or people that cannot be criticized) may turn you into on
admin
2013-05-04
39
问题
7 Things You Can’t Say in Canada
Attacking our sacred cows (things or people that cannot be criticized) may turn you into one looked down upon by all others — but it can also be a lot of fun.
Every culture has its unacknowledged taboos — the things you are forbidden to say or do in polite company, the accepted truths you are not allowed to doubt. You might think that a liberal, open-minded country like Canada would be free of such taboos, but you’d be wrong. In spite of our belief in our own enlightened tolerance, some things are simply not open to debate. If you try, you’re bound to shock the neighbors.
It’s risky to question the wisdom of the tribe. You might get stoned. On the other hand, some people might come near to you very quietly afterwards and confess that they secretly agree.
So here’s a challenge to a few of our nation’s most widely held beliefs. You say these things in public at your own danger. I will be elaborating on these points over the months to come. Feel free to stone me or secretly agree — or, even better, add to the list. At the very least, they’re sure to start a good dinner-party fight.
Margaret Atwood writes some really awful books.
The queen of Canadian Literature dominates the literary world like a giant. Nobody has won more awards than she has, and nobody is more feared. There is no such a thing as a bad review of a Margaret Atwood book in Canada. That’s too bad, because many of her books are tedious and unreadable, full of tortuous plots and unpleasant characters. Why will no one say so? Because we’re grateful that she’s put us on the global map. If they do, they’ll never work in this country again.
Recycling is a waste of time and money.
Once upon a time it was easy to put out the trash. Today, the Garbage Gestapo rules our lives.
Every household has become a mini version of the village dump, and every one of us has become a garbage picker, carefully separating our organic waste from our bottles and papers, and worrying about where our different kinds of garbage are supposed to go. Don’t try to sort a wine bottle into the wrong bag! The trash police will punish you. The truth about recycling is that it’s a giant waste of dollars and doesn’t help the environment. But don’t tell your kids. They won’t believe you. They’ve been brainwashed.
Only private enterprise can save public health care.
Tommy Douglas, the CBC’s Greatest Canadian, brought us universal health care. But even his plan didn’t originally pay for everybody’s minor diseases, such as ingrown toenails. His primary goal was to make sure nobody faced financial ruin if they got sick. Today we have a system where controlling costs is more important than treating patients, and where ideology is disabling us. In some places, including Toronto, people go blind waiting for cataract (白内障) surgery. The government could restore their sight tomorrow simply by sending them to a private clinic instead of to a hospital. The cost to the government would be exactly the same. But in Canada, private is a dirty word, and so the government would rather you go blind. Poor Tommy would be spinning in his grave.
David Suzuki is bad for the environment.
From global warming to farmed salmon and genetically modified crops, David Suzuki has just one message: The end is near.
He is our homegrown prophet of doom who can predict what will happen in the future. He advocates the essential wickedness of the human race. Like a modern Savonarola, he warns that unless we cast our material possessions into the bonfire, we’re all going to hell.
The trouble with this predicting vision is that people are starting to isolate from the environment. And our hugely expensive investment in the unworkable Kyoto treaty, which Mr. Suzuki tells us doesn’t go nearly far enough, will wipe out more practical measures to cut smog and clean up our waste sites.
A national daycare program won’t do a thing to help poor kids.
Cheap national daycare! Who could be against it? It’s supposed to give kids a better start in life, and nobody can object to that. But in Quebec, where the program started, universal daycare has turned out to be nothing more than a giant (and extremely costly) subsidy for relatively well-off middle-class parents. Few poor parents use the system.
No doubt convenient daycare is a gift set by god for many people. But so far there is no definitive evidence that kids who go to daycare go on to do better in school or in life. So if we want to invest billions in helping kids, why are we spending it on the kids who need help the least?
Group of Seven artists are overexposed genre painters.
I like A.Y. Jackson as much as you do. His paintings remind me of when I went to summer camp. I grew up with a reproduction of The West Wind hanging in our living room. (That was by Tom Thomson, who wasn’t really a member of Group of Seven, but never mind.) Group of Seven were the first artists to depict the wild Canadian landscape, and they were bold young rebels in their time.
But that time was 80 years ago. Today their work is the essence of bourgeois picture-postcard art — the kind of art safe to take your mother to see. Enough, already. Maybe it’s time we moved on.
The United States is the greatest force for good the world has ever known.
Of all the shocking things you can say around the dinner table, this is the most shocking one. After all, America-criticizing is part of our national identity.
At best, we see our neighbor as a well-intentioned but arrogant and wrong-doing bully that throws its weight around too much. At worst, we see our neighbor as one of the most evil nations in the world. And yet, right now, hundreds of millions of people in desperately poor parts of the world are being liberated from millennia of suffering and serfdom. Why? Because of the United States, which has spread its idea of economic freedom — and its purchasing power — around the world.
The original painting The West Wind was painted by______.
选项
答案
A.Y.Jackson
解析
本空应填一人名,该人名为The West Wind原画(original painting)的作者。首句提到,I like A.Y Jackson as much as you do.His paintings remind me of when I went to summer camp.即原画的作者是A.YJackson。而第一段括号内提到的Tom Thomson为复制品(reproduction)的作者,不是原作者。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/KBXFFFFM
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteashortessayentitledTuitionBasedonPerCredit-hourBasis.Youshouldwri
Themoresuccessfulpeopleare______(更可能经历极端的不幸).
A、Unmarriedwomenwithchildren.B、Handicappedwomenwithchildren.C、Youngwomenwithchildren.D、Divorcedwomenwithchildren.
A、Themanshouldrelaxforawhile.B、Themanshouldseeadoctor.C、Itshouldn’ttakelongtowritetheproposal.D、Themansho
Nowadays,socialnetworkinggetstoomuchattention.Peopleusecyberspacetoshareinformationandconnectwithwhotheythinki
A、Studyingforanexam.B、Reviewinghisfinaldraft.C、Askingforfeedback.D、Writingareport.D女士本以为男士学习是在准备考试。男士说他是在学习,但不是为了考
Schoolslookingtobancellphonesmayhaveanewexcuse:agrowingnumberofpeoplearedevelopinganallergytometalinthed
Alastingmarriagedoesnotalwayssignalahappymarriage.Plentyof【C1】______coupleshavestayedtogetherforchildren,religio
Alastingmarriagedoesnotalwayssignalahappymarriage.Plentyof【C1】______coupleshavestayedtogetherforchildren,religio
I’vealwaysbeenanoptimistandIsupposethatisrootedinmybeliefthatthepowerofcreativityandintelligencecanmaketh
随机试题
《食品卫生法》的立法目的有
王女士,左腰部被撞伤1小时,因左腰痛、尿色红来院就诊:查血压16/9kPa(120/70mmHg),心率78次/分,呼吸平稳,左腰部稍肿伴明显压痛,腹软无压痛。首先应做的检查是
A、血友病AB、维生素K依赖因子缺乏C、Ⅺ因子缺乏D、遗传性出血性毛细血管扩张症E、单纯性紫癜性染色体隐性遗传
当混凝土拌和物的坍落度不大于220mm时,应采用坍落度扩展法测定稠度。()
背景资料某办公楼工程,建筑面积82000m2,地下两层,地上二十二层,钢筋混凝土框架剪力墙结构,距邻近六层住宅楼7m。地基土层为粉质黏土和粉细砂,地下水为潜水,地下水位—9.5m,自然地面—0.5m。基础为筏板基础,埋深14.5m,基础底板混凝土厚150
泊位检疫适用于()等。
注册税务师受托对某企业2013年度企业所得税纳税情况进行审核,发现“财务费用”账户中列支有两次利息费用:一次是向银行流动资金借款的利息支出5万元,借款金额200万元,借款期限6个月;另一次是经过批准向本企业职工集资借款的利息支出5万元,集资金额50万元,借
Anyone______intheexamwillbepunished.
在一系统中,不同类对象之间的通信的一种构造称为(46),一个对象具有多种形态称为(47)。(47)
常年冻土
最新回复
(
0
)