首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Google’s Google problem Google is killing Google Reader. Use of Google Reader, a tool, by the way, for reading online conten
Google’s Google problem Google is killing Google Reader. Use of Google Reader, a tool, by the way, for reading online conten
admin
2013-10-17
43
问题
Google’s Google problem
Google is killing Google Reader. Use of Google Reader, a tool, by the way, for reading online content via RSS was concentrated among a small group of relatively intense users. As it happens, that small group includes quite a lot of people who write for or as part of their living. And so Google Reader has been mourned over, angrily at times, a bit more than the many other Google services that have come and gone.
It isn’t that hard to imagine what Google was thinking when it made this decision. It’s a big company, but even big companies have finite resources, and devoting those precious resources to something that isn’t making money and isn’t judged to have much in the way of development potential is not an attractive option. Dropping Reader isn’t going to hurt the company’s business.
Yet this little contretemps(令人尴尬的事)may suggest bigger trouble ahead for Google and big changes for the internet. One immediate effect is relatively easy to anticipate. John Hempton makes a nice point here: Google is in the process of abandoning its mission. Google’s stated mission is to organize all the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful. Google no longer cares. It seems what they care about is mass-markets...
Google has asked us to build our lives around it: to use its e-mail system, its search engines, its maps, its calendars, its cloud-based apps and storage services, its video- and photo-hosting services, and on and on and on. Google wants us to use its services in ways that provide it with interesting and valuable information, and eyeballs. If a particular Google experiment isn’t cutting it in that category, then Google may feel justified in axing it.
But that makes it increasingly difficult for Google to have success with new services. Why commit to using and coming to rely on something new if it might be pulled away at some future date? This is especially problematic for " social" apps that rely on network effects. Even a bad social service may thrive if it obtains a critical mass. Yanking away services beloved by early adopters almost guarantees that critical masses can’t be obtained: not, at any rate, without the provision of an incentive or commitment mechanism to protect the would-be users from the risk of losing a vital service.
There may be bigger implications still, however. As I said, Google has asked us to build our lives around it, and we have responded. This response entails(势必导致)a powerful self-reinforcement mechanism: both providers and users of information and other services change their behaviour as a result of the availability of a Google product. You can see this on a small scale with Reader. People design their websites and content based on the assumption that others, via an RSS reader, will come across and read that content in a certain way. And readers structure their reading habits, and ultimately their mental models of what information is available and where, based on the existence of this tool. If you then pull away the product at the heart of that system, you end up causing significant disruption(混乱), assuming there aren’t good alternatives available.
The issue becomes a bit more obvious when you think about something like search. Many of us now operate under the assumption that if we want to find something we will be able to do so quickly and easily via Google search. If I want an idea for a unique gift for someone, I can put in related search terms and feel pretty confident that I’ll get back store websites and blogs and Pinterest pages and newspaper stories and pictures all providing possible matches.
If I’m a researcher, I know I can quickly find relevant academic papers, data, newspaper accounts, expert analysis, and who knows what else related to an enormous range of topics. Once we all become comfortable with that state of affairs we quickly begin optimising(优化)the physical and digital resources around us. And once we all become comfortable with that, we begin rearranging our mental architecture. We stop memorising key data points and start learning how to ask the right questions. We begin to think differently. We stop keeping a mental model of the physical geography of the world around us, because why bother? We can call up an incredibly detailed and accurate map of the world, complete with satellite and street-level images, whenever we want. The bottom line is that the more we all participate in this world, the more we come to depend on it.
What Google has actually done is create a powerful infrastructure(基础设施). The shape of that infrastructure influences everything that goes online. And it influences the allocation of mental resources of everyone who interacts with the online world. But there isn’t much to the real human world that isn’t shaped by the mental activity of the people in it!
That’s a lot of power to put in the hands of a company that now seems interested, mostly, in identifying core mass-market services it can use to maximise its return on investment. Now in the short run, that may mostly be a problem for all of us. To the extent that we become worried about this phenomenon, we may go out and find back-up services or other alternatives. This will be less convenient and more costly, in terms of time and money, but those sufficiently foresighted(预见的)might feel it’s a better option than opening up gmail one day to read that the email service, and the 10-year’s worth of communication it holds, will soon be gone.
But in the long run that’s a problem for Google. Because we tend not to entrust(委托)this sort of critical public infrastructure to the private sector. Network externalities are all fine and good to ignore so long as they mainly apply to the sharing of news and pictures from a weekend trip with college friends. Once they concern large amount of economic output and the cognitive activity of millions of people, it is difficult to keep the government out. Maybe that obstacle will be sufficient to keep Google providing its most heavily used products. But maybe not.
I find myself thinking again of the brave new world of the industrial city, when new patterns of interaction led to enormous changes in economic activity, in culture and personal behaviour, and in the way we think. We upgraded ourselves, in terms of education and social norms, to maximise the return to urban life. I think we, meaning users of the web and the companies that provide its blood and bones, are only beginning to deal with the implications of a world awash(充斥的)in information.
What will Google do if a service cannot offer interesting and valuable information and eyeballs?
选项
A、It will ask us to build our lives around the service.
B、It will make big changes in the offering for the internet.
C、It will quit its mission of organizing the world’s information.
D、It will think it is right to close down the service.
答案
D
解析
本题考查如果某项服务不能提供有趣的、有价值的信息,也不能吸引眼球的话,谷歌会怎么做。定位句指出,对于这样的服务,谷歌会觉得砍掉这项服务是正确的。D)是对原文的同义转述,故为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/IlQFFFFM
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
TheygiveActionManacertainruggednessandbestowinstanttestosterone(肾上腺激素)onmovieheroes,andaccordingtoBritishpsyc
Tensofthousandsofthepoorestpart-timestudentsaretogetextramoneytohelppayuniversityfeesandmeetrisinglivingco
Dr.Sternberghasproposedatheoryofintelligencethatincludessuchtraitsashowwellapersonplansstrategiesforproblem-
A、Atalocalscenicspot.B、Ataplaceofhistoricalinterest.C、Atanarchaeologicalmuseum.D、Atamilitarytrainingcamp.B细节
Formorethantwocenturies,America’scollegesanduniversitieshavebeenthebackboneofthecountry’sprogress.Theyhaveedu
A、InFlorida.B、InNewYork.C、InCalifornia.D、InIndiana.A推理判断题。女士从男士对天气的评论判断他是Florida人,但男士说自己在纽约出生,但现在住在佛罗里达已有十年了。
A、Hisfather.B、Hismanagerofthecountrymusicclub.C、Abusinesswoman.D、Hisbrother.C推理题。浏览选项可知,本题问的是“这个人是谁”,听录音时对于各选项所提及
ClimateChangeMayMakeInsect-BorneDiseasesHardertoControlClimatechangecaninfluencehowinfectiousdiseasesaffect
A、Afraid.B、Excited.C、Curious.D、Indifferent.A短文说,最初,人类和其他动物一样很可能也怕火。A正确。Atfirst引导的语义强调之处出题,四个选项都为表示心理活动的形容词,听到什么选什么。
A、Ithelpsthecandidategetthejob.B、It’sagoodwaytoflatterthemanager.C、Itshowsthatthecandidateisconfident.D、It
随机试题
紫癜与充血性皮疹最主要的区别是()。
下列选项中可以作为评价行政活动合法性准则的有:()
某工程项目的计划进度和截止到第8周末的实际进度如下图所示(双线条表示计划进度,粗实线表示实际进度)。如果各项工作均为匀速进展,则截止到第8周末()。
建设项目总概算是编制和确定建设项目()全部费用的文件。
与产量有明确的技术或实物关系的变动成本是()。
如果张生喜欢摄影,则他会喜欢旅游;如果他不喜欢摄影,则他会喜欢驾车;但是,如果张生不喜欢旅游,则他对驾车也就不感兴趣了。据此,可以推出张生()。
根据以下资料,回答111—115题2009年末,某省第二、三产业4.41万个企业法人单位的实收资本总额为2534.24亿元。在全部企业法人单位的实收资本总额中,由国家投入的资本1456.57亿元,占57.5%;集体投入的资本256.18亿元,占10.1%
下列表述正确的是()。
[A]dog[B]water[C]cat[D]earth[E]air[F]horse[G]pigYoukeepittowatchyourhouse.
Whatdoestheauthormeanbysaying"the21stcenturyequivalentofbeingcaughtnaked"(Lines3-4,Paragraph2)?Accord
最新回复
(
0
)