The Metropolitan Police will no longer describe black people as black, as part of a new attempt to counter charges of racism in

admin2010-05-25  42

问题    The Metropolitan Police will no longer describe black people as black, as part of a new attempt to counter charges of racism in the force. Both black and Asian people will in future be referred to as "visible minority ethnics".
   The term, which replaces the phrase "black and Asian minority ethnics" is expected to be adopted officially in January.
   The decision was criticized yesterday as unnecessary and confusing by black police officers. Anna Scott, the general secretary of the National Black Police Association, said it amounted to a step too far by the "political correctness" movement.
   "We have gone from saying ’black ethnic minority’ to ’black minority ethnic’ to ’visible minority ethnic’ in a matter of years," she said. "There has been so much emphasis on the issue of terminology, that the issue has become confusing for black police officers, let alone white ones. We are risking becoming too politically correct at the expense of being clearly understood by officers and the general public."
   A senior police official told The Telegraph that some white officers were using the phrase so that they would avoid saying the words "black" or "Asian", for fear of causing offence.
   The official claimed that the term would allow these communities to be distinguished for others—such as the Irish and the Greeks—whose members are, according to the new terminology, "invisible" because they tend to be light-skinned.
   In the 1960s, the phrase "colored" was officially used by some police forces. By the 1970s, this had changed to "black" to describe people whose ancestors originated from the Caribbean and Africa and "Asian" for those who originated from the Indian subcontinent.
   The phrase "ethnic minority" was also widely used as a collective term for both groups, but this was dropped in favor of "minority ethnic" five years ago, promising criticism that it was an improper use of English.
   Bernard Lamb, the chairman of the London branch of the Queen’s English Society, said that the new description was grammatically incorrect and over-sensitive. "I do not like this new term at all. The word ’ethnic’ is an adjective and you cannot pluralize an adjective," he said. "They seem to have used a euphemism for black and Asian when I imagine most black and Asian people do not mind the empty words themselves at all."
   The change will cost a significant sum of public money in retraining officers and rewriting manuals and a spokesman for the Metropolitan Police said that some senior officers were already using the term.
   The spokesman said that the new term was not a redefinition but was meant to standardize the phraseology used by the police.
   "Concerns have been raised about the nature and range of terms used in papers presented to the authority when discussing ethnicity."
   "To ensure that there is a uniform approach and understanding of terminology used in future, and that offence is avoided, the January meeting of the authority’s equal opportunities and diversity board will make decisions about the terminology we expect to use," he said.
Why in Lamb’s eyes most black and Asian people de not mind the words at all?

选项 A、They have been fed up with such word play and tricks.
B、They know that there is no substantial change at all.
C、What they care is the association of the words, not the words themselves.
D、They arc apathetic to such political issues, for they are so far from them.

答案B

解析 推理判断题。Lamb暗示黑人和亚裔对警察部门对他们称呼的改变漠视的原因是这只是官方的委婉说法,他们的地位根本没有实质性的改变,而不是因为民众不关心政治。选项A 没有提及。根据第九段最后一句话“这只是对亚裔和黑人的委婉称呼,我想大多数人对这种空话本身并不感兴趣”。我们可以推断在Lamb眼里,人们关心的是实质性的改变,而不是名称本身。选项C 只可能是其中的一个心理方面的因素。选项D ,观点不正确,不合题意,予以排除。所以正确答案为B 。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/Il8MFFFM
0

最新回复(0)