首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
What if the government simply paid everyone enough so that no one was poor? That’s the so called "universal basic income" or UBI
What if the government simply paid everyone enough so that no one was poor? That’s the so called "universal basic income" or UBI
admin
2021-02-24
24
问题
What if the government simply paid everyone enough so that no one was poor? That’s the so called "universal basic income" or UBI. It’s an insane idea that’s gaining an unlikely alliance of supporters. The follow excerpt provides details of this idea.
Write an article of NO LESS THAN 800 words, in which you should:
1. summarize the basic idea of UBI and its justification, and then
2. express your opinion towards it, especially whether it is practical in the near future.
A Universal Basic Income Is the Solution to Poverty
There’s a simple way to end poverty: the government just gives everyone enough money, so nobody is poor. No ifs, buts, conditions, or tests. Everyone gets the minimum they need to survive, even if they already have plenty.
This, in essence, is "universal basic income " or "guaranteed basic income"—where, instead of multiple income assistance programs, we have just one: a single payment to all citizens, regardless of background, gender, or race. It’s a policy idea that sounds crazy at first, but actually begins to make sense when you consider some recent trends.
The first is that work isn’t what it used to be. Many people now struggle through a 50-hour week and still don’t have enough to live on. There are many reasons for this—including the heartlessness of employers and the weakness of unions—but it’s a fact. Work no longer pays. The wages of most American workers have stagnated or declined since the 1970s.
The second: it’s likely to get worse. Robots already do many menial tasks. In the future, they’ll do more sophisticated jobs as well. A study from Oxford University found that 47% of jobs are at risk of computerization over the next two decades. We’re approaching an era when there will simply be less to do.
The third is that traditional welfare is both not what it used to be and not very efficient. The value of welfare for families with children is now well below what it was in the 1990s, for example.
For these reasons and others, the idea of a basic income for everyone is becoming increasingly popular. The exact details of basic income still need to be worked out, but it might work something like this: Instead of welfare payments, subsidies for health care, and tax credits for the working poor, we would take that money and use it to cover a single payment that would give someone the chance to live reasonably.
A pilot in the 1970s in Manitoba, Canada, showed that a "Mincome" not only ended poverty but also reduced hospital visits and raised high-school completion rates. There seemed to be a community-affirming effect, which showed itself in people making use of free public services more responsibly.
Meanwhile, there were eight "negative income tax" trials in the U.S. in the ’70s, where people received payments and the government clawed back most of it in taxes based on your other income. The results for those trials were more mixed. They reduced poverty, but people also worked slightly less than normal. To some, this is the major drawback of basic income: it could make people lazier than they would otherwise be. That would certainly be a problem, though it’s questionable whether, in the future, there will be as much employment anyway. The age of robots and artificial intelligence seems likely to hollow out many jobs, perhaps changing how we view notions of laziness and productivity altogether.
选项
答案
Universal Basic Income Is Unrealistic As our society further progresses in creating wealth, the issue of poverty becomes more prominent and the elimination of it is more urgent. In order to end poverty, the idea of universal basic income is put forward which proposes that everyone gets the minimum they need to live regardless of what he or she already has, with considerations of the decline of salary, the computerization of work and the inefficiency of traditional welfare system. Despite the fact that policy derived from this idea has achieved quite promising results in pilot towns in Canada and America, I still believe that universal basic income is unrealistic. It is bound to fail if universally applied. First and obviously, the idea of universal basic income breaks the conventional balance between work and pay. If people reap without sowing, then there would be such individuals who would rather stroll around than work or do anything substantial for the good of society. The reason is as plain as day. Working or not, all people can anyway receive the minimal income sufficient to support their living. As a result, laziness will spread like virus among people who see through the "benefit" of not working. Another argument in favor of my view is that once idleness is regarded as a comfortable way of living, then the production of the whole society will without doubt slow down. I do not deny the computerization of much work, yet neither do I deny that robots and computers have to be controlled and operated by men. Therefore, laziness among the general public will, in one way or another, decrease the overall productivity of the world. And we should bear in mind that without sustainable sources of income it is a mission impossible to guarantee universal basic income to everyone. In a word, I contend that it is unrealistic to enforce universal basic income since it violates the rule of gaining pay through work. In fact, the implementation of universal basic income, instead of eradicating poverty, may put more people at the risk of it.
解析
材料探讨了“无条件基本收入”这一话题,大致可分为两部分内容,包括提出这一想法的原因和它在试点产生的结果。
前六段中,作者陈述无条件基本收入政策得到支持的三方面的理由。一是现在工资太低不足以维持生活(Work no longer pays.);二是大部分工作很可能会变成计算机化(at risk of computerization),结果是可做的工作越来越少;三是传统的福利政策也大不如前。因此,无条件基本收入政策有其合理性和必要性。
最后两段则以加拿大和美国为例,介绍该政策试行后的结果。加拿大的一个试点(pilot)说明无条件基本收入不仅能消除贫困(ended poverty),而且能减少就医人数和提高高中结业率(high-school completion rates)。而美国的例子则体现了让人喜忧参半(more mixed)的结果:一方面减少了贫穷(reduced poverty),但另一方面人们却更懒了(make people lazier)。
开篇:总结材料,概括支持无条件基本收入政策的原因及其影响;提出个人观点——无条件基本收入的政策不现实。
主体:分两方面论述无条件基本收入政策不现实的原因。
1.无条件基本收入打破了传统的工作和报酬之间的平衡。
2.一旦懒惰被当成一种舒适的生活方式,则将削弱社会生产力。
结尾:重申观点,指出无条件基本收入违背了有付出才有收入的原则,因此难以实现。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/IXkMFFFM
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
TypesofLanguageTestingI.Placement—sortnewstudentsinto【T1】______【T1】______—testthestudent’s【T2】______ratherthansp
TypesofLanguageTestingI.Placement—sortnewstudentsinto【T1】______【T1】______—testthestudent’s【T2】______ratherthansp
A、Shefeltbored.B、Shefeltlonely.C、Shecherishedthem.D、Thesubjectwaseasy.C面试的开头部分谈到了MissGreen的大学时光,根据原文关键词agreattim
A、Itscontentscanresisteasydamage.B、Registeredpostprovidesaprotectionagainstdamage.C、Registeredpostreceivesnospe
Afterthehorrorbecamepublicinhishometown,Sylacauga,Alabama,citycouncilpresidentGeorgeCarltontoldareporter,"Thi
Thelasttwotornadoseasonshavebeenthedeadliestinadecade,with206deaths.EveryonefromtheinsuranceindustrytoAlG
还是成都的那些旧街道,我跟着你一步一步地走过平坦的石板路,我望着你的背影,心里安慰地想:父亲还很康健呢。一种幸福的感觉使我的全身发热了。我那时不会知道我是在梦中,也忘记了二十五年来的艰苦日子。在戏园里,我坐在你旁边,看台上的武戏,你还详细地给我解
学问要有根底,根底要打得平正坚实,以后永远受用。初学阶段的科目之最重要的莫过于语文与数学。语文是阅读达意的工具,国文不通便很难表达自己,外国文不通便很难吸取外来的新知。数学是思想条理之最好的训练。其他科目也各有各的用处,其重要性很难强分轩轾,例如体育,从一
历史证明,在科学发展的进程中,一些杰出人物个人的作用不可忽视。杰出的科学家,既为人类物质文明做出贡献,也以自己高尚的道德情操,为人类的精神文明留下宝贵的财富。爱因斯坦在评价居里夫人时说过,一流人物的道德品质对于时代和历史进程的意义,也许超过其才智成就。中国
华裔电脑名人王安博士说,影响他一生的事发生在他6岁之时。一天他外出玩耍,经过一棵大树时,突然有一个鸟巢掉在他的头上,里面滚出一只嗷嗷待哺的小麻雀。他决定把它带回去喂养,连同鸟巢一起带回了家。走到家门口,突然想起妈妈不允许他在家里养小动物。他轻轻地
随机试题
半封闭浇注系统的直浇道出口截面积()横浇道截面积总和。
纠正酸中毒的目标是CO2CP为低氯性碱中毒时,血情氯降低,尿氯大于
患者,女,65岁。Holtor发现运动时出现室性期前收缩二联律,短阵成对室性期前收缩,并伴有ST段水平下移大于0.15mV,休息后可减少。平静时心电图正常。有慢性咳嗽史30年,糖尿病、高脂血症史15年。查体:血压140/90mmHg,心率78次/分。双肺正
组织兴奋后处于绝对不应期时,其兴奋性为
在工程项目总投资中预备费包括()。
海运提单的签发日期应早于保险单的签发日期。()
可转换债券的持有人具有在未来按一定的价格购买普通股股票的权利,因此可转换债券具有买入期权的性质。()
2×20年10月15日,甲公司从非关联方购入乙公司90%的股权,共支付价款2700万元。乙公司是甲公司专为转售而取得的子公司,并且在当前状态下可立即出售。甲公司计划与丙公司于2×20年11月30日签订股权转让合同。初步决定转让价格为2800万元,预计甲
设三阶常系数齐次线性微分方程有特解y1=ex,y2=2xex,y3=3e-x,则该微分方程为().
下列关于关系模式的码的叙述中,正确的是______。
最新回复
(
0
)