首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Do we need laws that prevent us from running risks with our lives? If so, then perhaps laws are needed prohibiting the sale of c
Do we need laws that prevent us from running risks with our lives? If so, then perhaps laws are needed prohibiting the sale of c
admin
2012-11-20
40
问题
Do we need laws that prevent us from running risks with our lives? If so, then perhaps laws are needed prohibiting the sale of cigarettes and alcoholic drinks. Both products have been known to kill people. The hazards of drinking too much alcohol are as bad as or worse than the hazards of smoking too many cigarettes. All right then, let’s pass a law closing the liquor stores and the bars in this country. Let’s put an end once and for all to the ruinous disease from which as many as 10 million Americans currently suffer alcoholism.
But wait. We’ve already tried that. For 13 years, between 1920 and 1933 there were no liquor stores anywhere in the United States. They were shut down abolished by an amendment (修正案) to the Constitution (to 18th) and by a law of Congress (the Volstead Act). After January 20, 1920, there was supposed to be no more manufacturing, selling, or transporting of "intoxicating liquors." Without any more liquor, people could not drink it. And if they did not drink it, how could they get drunk? There would be no more dangers to the public welfare from drunkenness and alcoholism. It was all very logical. And yet prohibition of liquor, beer, and wine did not work. Why?
Because, law or no law, millions of people still liked to drink alcohol. And they were willing to take risks to get it. They were not about to change their tastes and habits just because of a change in the law. And gangs of liquor smugglers made it easy to buy an illegal drink. They smuggled millions of gallons of the outlawed beverages across the Canadian and Mexican borders. Crime and drunkenness were both supposed to decline as a result of prohibition. Instead people drank more alcohol than ever-- often poisonous alcohol.
On December 5th, 1993 they repealed (撤销) prohibition by ratifying (批准) the 21st Amendment to the Constitution.
When enacting the prohibition laws, government officials assumed that ______.
选项
A、every American would buy alcohol illegally
B、all criminal activities would cease
C、patrols of the Canadian border would halt the sale of alcohol
D、the social threat from drunkenness would decline
答案
D
解析
从颁发禁酒令的理由中可看出,政府官员们认为“There would be no more dangers to the public welfare from drunkenness and alcoholism”,这恰好就是D项的意思。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/IJuGFFFM
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Hecuttheapple______,andgavethebigtohislittlesister.
Thefire______twopersons’property.
Unlesswespendmoneyspottingandpreventingasteroidsnow,onemightcrashintoEarthanddestroylifeasweknow,saysomesc
Hangzhou,______wespentlastspring,isoneofthemostbeautifulcitiesinChina.
Feelingtiredlately?Hasthedoctorsaidhecannotfindanythingwrongwithyou?Perhapshesentyoutoahospital,butallthe
You’realone,drivingonadesertedstretchofhighway.Suddenlyyouareenclosedbycloudsofsmokeandsteamastheengine-tem
Eyecontactisanonverbaltechniquethathelpsthespeaker"sell"hisorherideastoanaudience.Besidesitspersuasivepower
Whenyouarebeinginterviewedforajob,rememberthatit’s【61】formanypeopletobenervous,【62】insuchastress-producingsit
Shelookstired.She______lastnight.
Mr.Smithgavehiswifetenpoundforherbirthday—tenprettypoundnotes.Sothedayafterherbirthday,MrsSmithwentshoppi
随机试题
男性,67岁,心房颤动15年。1周前因心功能不全给予地高辛0.25mg口服,每日1次。今天开始心室律突然变得绝对规则,50次/分。最大可能是
男,33岁,反复腹痛10年,表现为右下腹和脐周为主的绞痛,伴有糊状泻,无脓血,并时有低热。体检发现右下腹包块。为与肠结核相鉴别,下列哪项依据最有意义
A.能力B.气质C.性格D.人格E.自我意识在人格结构中,表现在心理活动的强度、速度、灵活性和指向性等方面的一种稳定的心理体征,称为
2型糖尿病最基本的病理生理改变是
有A、B两项连续工作,其最早开始时间分别为第4d和第10d,其连续时间分别为4d和5d,则AT作的自由时差为()d。
所谓工程基本构造要素就是通常所说的()。
期货从业人员违反《期货从业人员执业行为准则(修订)》,情节轻微,且没有造成严重后果的,处理方式为()。
关于宋词,下列说法中不正确的是()。
在int a[5]={1,3,5};中,a[1]的值是( )。
HowtoWriteaResearchReportAstandardformatwillhelpreaderstolocatetheinformationtheywantquickly.Itistruethat
最新回复
(
0
)