首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How science goes wrong Scientific research has changed the world. Now it needs to change itself. A)A simple idea underli
How science goes wrong Scientific research has changed the world. Now it needs to change itself. A)A simple idea underli
admin
2016-04-26
47
问题
How science goes wrong
Scientific research has changed the world. Now it needs to change itself.
A)A simple idea underlies science: "trust, but verify". Results should always be subject to challenge from experiment. That simple but powerful idea has generated a vast body of knowledge. Since its birth in the 17th century, modern science has changed the world beyond recognition, and overwhelmingly for the better. But success can breed extreme self-satisfaction. Modern scientists are doing too much trusting and not enough verifying, damaging the whole of science, and of humanity. B)Too many of the findings are the result of cheap experiments or poor analysis. A rule of thumb among biotechnology venture-capitalists is that half of published research cannot be replicated(复制). Even that may be optimistic. Last year researchers at one biotech firm, Amgen, found they could reproduce just six of 53 "milestone" studies in cancer research. Earlier, a group at Bayer, a drug company, managed to repeat just a quarter of 67 similarly important papers. A leading computer scientist worries that three-quarters of papers in his subfield are nonsense. In 2000-10, roughly 80,000 patients took part in clinical trials based on research that was later withdrawn because of mistakes or improperness.
What a load of rubbish
C)Even when flawed research does not put people’s lives at risk—and much of it is too far from the market to do so—it blows money and the efforts of some of the world’s best minds. The opportunity costs of hindered progress are hard to quantify, but they are likely to be vast. And they could be rising.
D)One reason is the competitiveness of science. In the 1950s, when modern academic research took shape after its successes in the Second World War, it was still a rarefied(小众的)pastime. The entire club of scientists numbered a few hundred thousand. As their ranks have swelled to 6m -7m active researchers on the latest account, scientists have lost their taste for self-policing and quality control. The obligation to "publish or perish(消亡)" has come to rule over academic life. Competition for jobs is cut-throat. Full professors in America earned on average $135,000 in 2012—more than judges did. Every year six freshly minted PhDs strive for every academic post. Nowadays verification(the replication of other people’s results)does little to advance a researcher’s career. And without verification, uncertain findings live on to mislead.
E)Careerism also encourages exaggeration and the choose-the-most-profitable of results. In order to safeguard their exclusivity, the leading journals impose high rejection rates: in excess of 90% of submitted manuscripts. The most striking findings have the greatest chance of making it onto the page. Little wonder that one in three researchers knows of a colleague who has polished a paper by, say, excluding inconvenient data from results based on his instinct, And as more research teams around the world work on a problem, it is more likely that at least one will fall prey to an honest confusion between the sweet signal of a genuine discovery and a nut of the statistical noise. Such lake correlations are often recorded in journals eager for startling papers. If they touch on drinking wine, or letting children play video games, they may well command the front pages of newspapers, too.
F)Conversely, failures to prove a hypothesis(假设)are rarely even offered for publication, let alone accepted. "Negative results" now account for only 14% of published papers, down from 30% in 1990. Yet knowing what is false is as important to science as knowing what is true. The failure to report failures means that researchers waste money and effort exploring blind alleys already investigated by other scientists.
G)The holy process of peer review is not all it is praised to be, either. When a prominent medical journal ran research past other experts in the field, it found that most of the reviewers failed to spot mistakes it had deliberately inserted into papers, even after being told they were being tested.
If it’s broke, fix it
H)All this makes a shaky foundation for an enterprise dedicated to discovering the truth about the world. What might be done to shore it up? One priority should be for all disciplines to follow the example of those that have done most to tighten standards. A start would be getting to grips with statistics, especially in the growing number of fields that screen through untold crowds of data looking for patterns. Geneticists have done this, and turned an early stream of deceptive results from genome sequencing(基因组测序)into a flow of truly significant ones.
I)Ideally, research protocols(草案)should be registered in advance and monitored in virtual notebooks. This would curb the temptation to manipulate the experiment’s design midstream so as to make the results look more substantial than they are.(It is already meant to happen in clinical trials of drugs.)
Where possible, trial data also should be open for other researchers to inspect and test.
J)The most enlightened journals are already showing less dislike of tedious papers. Some government funding agencies, including America’s National Institutes of Health, which give out $30 billion on research each year, are working out how best to encourage replication. And growing numbers of scientists, especially young ones, understand statistics. But these trends need to go much further. Journals should allocate space for "uninteresting" work, and grant-givers should set- aside money to pay for it. Peer review should be tightened—or perhaps dispensed with altogether, in favour of post-publication evaluation in the form of appended comments. That system has worked well in recent years in physics and mathematics. Lastly, policymakers should ensure that institutions using public money also respect the rules.
K)Science still commands enormous—if sometimes perplexed—respect. But its privileged status is founded on the capacity to be right most of the time and to correct its mistakes when it gets things wrong. And it is not as if the universe is short of genuine mysteries to keep generations of scientists hard at work. The false trails laid down by cheap research are an unforgivable barrier to understanding.
Some clinical trials from 2000 to 2010 were later abandoned by reason of mistakes or impropemess.
选项
答案
B
解析
本题涉及目前学术问题的危害,由clinical trials from 2000 to 2010和mistakes or improper-ness可以定位到B段最后一句。原文提到2000年到2010年间一些临床试验因为试验所依据的研究存在错误或者不当之处而被撤销,题中by reason of对应原文because of,本题是对B段最后一句的同义转述,故选B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/HouFFFFM
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
Averyinterestingandimportantdevelopmentinscienceisadevicecalledlaser.Alaserisamachinewhichproducesalightbe
GettingThin—forGoodA)Justabouteveryonehasbeenonadietatonetimeoranother,andmillionsofushavelearnedthatthe
GettingThin—forGoodA)Justabouteveryonehasbeenonadietatonetimeoranother,andmillionsofushavelearnedthatthe
ProtestsattheuseofanimalsinresearchhavetakenanewandfearfulcharacterinBritainwithattemptedmurderoftwoBritis
Astheearth’ssurfaceswarm,evaporation(蒸发)isdryingoutforestsandsoils,increasingsusceptibilitytofire.Lastsummer,m
Sometimeago,aninterestingdiscoverywasmadeby【C1】______ontheAegeanislandofKea.AnAmericanteamexploredatemplewhi
景德镇,中国瓷都(ceramicmetropolis),是世界瓷器艺术花园的耀眼明珠。它位于长江南部,是江南一个有活力的(powerful)城镇。它制造瓷器(porcelain)的历史有1700多年,已经形成了丰富的瓷器文化传统。稀有的瓷器文物(cera
A、Amovie.B、Alecture.C、Aplay.D、Aspeech.C
A、He’sbetter.B、He’sfeelingworse.C、He’ssickinbed.D、Hehasrecovered.A女士听说男士感冒了,问男士今天感:觉怎么样,男士则回答说至少他已经不用躺在床上了(outofbe
A、Peopleof65yearsold.B、Peopleover65yearsold.C、Peoplebetween60and65yearsold.D、Retiredpeople.B事实细节题。题目问的是在美国多大年
随机试题
石崇和王恺争豪,并穷绮丽,以饰舆服。武帝,恺之甥也,每助恺。尝以一珊瑚树高二尺许赐恺。枝柯扶疏,世罕其比。恺以示崇;崇视讫,以铁如意击之,应手而碎。恺既惋惜,又以为疾己之宝,声色甚厉。崇日:“不足恨,今还卿。”乃命左右悉取珊瑚树,有三尺、四尺,条千绝世,光
Allthatwereallyneedtoplotoutthefutureofouruniverseareafewgoodmeasurements.Thisdoesnotmeanthatwecansitd
能引起生物机体发生反应的各种环境变化,统称为
()是指水与土空隙管壁接触时,由于湿润和静电引力作用,在毛细管壁形成的水。
有抗冻性要求的混凝土必须掺入(),使其具有要求的含气量。
甲公司将它的关键业务外包出去,结果外包公司仗着该业务对公司的重要性,开出高价,后来查出是因为企业内部涉及该业务的人员,与外包公司的人员串通,对于业务涉及的关键环节的技术多收费用,导致业务控制系统失控。其中包含的风险有()。
企业享受的下列税收优惠中,属于企业会计准则规定的政府补助的是()。
为清除井底污泥,用揽绳将抓斗放入井底,抓起污泥提出井口,设井深30m,抓斗自重400N,揽绳每米重50N,抓斗盛污泥2000N,提升速度为3m/s,在提升过程中,污泥以20N/s的速度从抓斗中漏掉,现将抓斗从井底提升到井口,问客服重力做多少功?
Oracle的Internet解决方案主要包括哪几部分工具?Ⅰ.OracleExpressServerⅡ.OracleExpressObjectsⅢ.OracleExpressAnalyzerⅣ.OracleWebListenerⅤ.OracleWebAg
下列关于对象的描述,不正确的是()。
最新回复
(
0
)