首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A recent talk by games academic Jane McGonigal has re-ignited discussion on the role they play in our society. Traditionally, th
A recent talk by games academic Jane McGonigal has re-ignited discussion on the role they play in our society. Traditionally, th
admin
2014-07-20
41
问题
A recent talk by games academic Jane McGonigal has re-ignited discussion on the role they play in our society. Traditionally, the debate has centered on whether they are "damaging" or merely "harmless fun". But McGonigal is a games advocate. Her belief is that games are actually good for us.
In order to solve the world’s most urgent problems, McGonigal says, we need to play more games because gaming creates people who are solution-focused, collaborative, optimistic and hard-working. This position is interesting, although open to the obvious critique that, unlike in-game challenges, real-world problems are not set up to be rewarding, interesting or even soluble, so framing them as a game is likely to lead nowhere. But there’s certainly potential in using game-like mechanics to encourage us to do things we otherwise might not want to: such as the S2H fitness monitor, which allows users to claim rewards for physical activity.
The wider point—whether playing games actually improves any of our skills—is still open for debate and research. Various studies have shown that playing certain games can increase players’ visual attention, fine motor skills and spatial reasoning. Intuitively, it is not surprising that practicing skills involving fast responses and complicated physical maneuvers might make us better at them.
But is this a reason to play games, or a useful position for gaming advocates? As a novelist, I’ve always found the idea of promoting reading because it improves cognitive skills deeply depressing. Reading is a wonderful thing not because it makes our brains better but because it is enjoyable, enriching and gives us new experiences: just like games.
Once someone has told you that something is good for you, it immediately becomes less attractive. I’m not sure it’s necessary to say that playing games will save the world or improve us. Can’t we just have fun?
What should be the purpose of promoting reading according to the author?
选项
A、To broaden readers’ eyesight.
B、To make readers more intelligent.
C、To improve readers’ visual attention.
D、To please readers.
答案
D
解析
细节判断题。定位到第4段,作者认为为了提高认知能力而去阅读是让人沮丧的,阅读是件很快乐的事情,提倡阅读不是因为它使读者变得聪明而是能让读者感到愉悦,给读者新的体验;因此选项D(阅读在于能让人快乐)符合题意。而A(阅读能拓宽人的视野)、B(使人变得智慧)、C(提升人的视觉)都不是作者提倡阅读的原因,故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/HLxMFFFM
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Thomaswouldhavebeenmoresuccessfulifhehadstudiedharder,______.
Congressionalleadershavetoworkoutacompromisebecause______
Educationofexceptionalchildrenmeansprovisionofspecialeducationalservicestothosechildrenwhoareeitherhandicappedo
Astudyhasbeenconductedonpublicopinionontheuseofanimalsinresearch.Most—7in10—Swedesindicatethattheuseofani
Thepooroldconsumer!He’dhavetopayagreatdealmoreifadvertisingdidn’tcreatemassmarketsforproducts.Itisprecisel
Prolongedsleepdeprivationincreasestheriskofsufferingfromastrokeorheartdisease,accordingtoamajorlong-termstudy
Theschoolcommitteehopedthattheirchoiceofplaywouldbe______withthestudentsand.theirparents.
ItissaidthatthepublicandCongressionalconcernaboutdeceptive(欺骗性的)packagingrumpus(喧嚣)startedbecauseSenatorHartdi
One______bestruckbyhisenthusiasm.
Thehumanbodyiscomposedoforgans,each______adefinitejobtodo.
随机试题
1岁患儿,母乳喂养,未加辅食,约2个月前发现患儿活动少,不哭、不笑,面色蜡黄,表情呆滞,手及下肢颤抖检查发现肝、脾增大,血红细胞1×1012/L,血红蛋白50g/L。该患儿可能为()。
根据《人民检察院办理未成年人刑事案件的规定》,关于检察院审查批捕未成年犯罪嫌疑人,下列哪些做法是正确的?(2010年卷二78题,多选)
(2013年)某通风管道系统,通风机的总压头p=980Pa,风量Q=4m3/s。现需要将该系统的风量提高10%,则该系统通风机应具有的总压头为()。
如果承包商遇到不可预见的物质条件,并发出通知,则承包商可以索赔( )。
电梯安装工程中,( )通常用于运行速度小于2.5m/s的电梯。
勤俭持家是社会主义基本道德规范的基本内容。()
在程序运行时,下面的叙述中正确的是( )。
若在一个非零无符号二进制整数右边加两个零形成一个新的数,则新数的值是原数值的
About23hours.
Whataretheman’shobbies?
最新回复
(
0
)