首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Farewell, Libraries? Amazon.com’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of h
Farewell, Libraries? Amazon.com’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of h
admin
2013-10-22
31
问题
Farewell, Libraries?
Amazon.com’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of hardcover books came as no surprise. It had to happen sometime. But the news did conjure quite an interesting mental image.-libraries that from now on will look smaller and less crowded.
For the moment, let’s not argue with the proposition that people will read as much as they ever have, no matter whether they read an actual book or a book on a screen. The habits of readers may not change(if anything, people may read ore, or at least buy more—several stories have quoted e-book owners who say they buy more titles for their e-readers than they did when they were buying hardcover books). But if readers aren’t changing, their environments will. Rooms that once held books will well, whatever they hold from now on, it won’t be books, or not as many books. Theoretically, your space will be more spare, more serenely uncluttered. That’s the theory, at least. My experience is that stuff expands to fill the space available. But you can dream.
All of this has already happened big time in the music business, where downloads have gradually but surely replaced CDs. I don’t know how many people I’ve overheard crowing because they managed to transfer their entire music collections onto their computers. All those CDs taking up space on the wall have gone—All those CDs that travel from car to kitchen to bedroom to living room, with the CD and the case getting separated somewhere along the way a problem no more in the digital age. From now on, we’ll own what might be described as the idea of stuff, since the actual physical things- records, tapes, photographs, CDs, and now books — have been as good as vaporized, with the information contained therein stored away on a hard drive.
This, of course, is merely collateral(并行的)damage in the digital revolution, if damage it is. There’s as yet no way to tell if this transition is good, bad, both, or neither, but surely the absence of a physical library, be it musical or literary, marks a fundamental shift in the way we live and think about things. In music, for example, the rise of iTunes, Pandora, YouTube, and all the other online music players has quickly eroded our devotion to the long-playing album as the principal means of organizing music. After a half century of neglect, the lowly single is back on top. Most immediately this has consequences for artists, maybe not so much for the people who buy their music. But who knows?
With books, the absence of packaging does nothing to the contents. 1 can buy a hardcover copy of Moby-Dick or download it onto an e-reader, and Melville is still Melville. But I grew up loving Rockwell Kent’s illustrations of that novel, and later Barry Moser’s. It’s hard to think of the book without them. I can do that, certainly, but some little thing is lost.
Paperbacks and public libraries made books cheap or free but certainly available to millions who might otherwise not have been able to afford them, and all that happened long before I was born. Nevertheless, I was brought up by people who had been taught —and who taught me—that books were valuable things, things to be cared for and cherished, and I have owned some volumes for close to half a century(almost none of them, 1 should point out, qualify as "collectible" or valuable to an antiquarian book collector; owning a rare book makes me nervous. I like books I can hold, read, and even here my mother is spinning in her grave write in).
I come from a generation for whom the books and records on the shelf signaled, in some way, who you were(starting with the fact that you were a person who owned books or records or CDs). If you visited a friend, you took the first chance you had to secretly scan that friend’s shelves to get a handle on the person. I suppose I could sneak a peek at a friend’s Kindle, but is that the same? And try that kind of snooping on a bus or in a coffee shop and you’ll probably get arrested.
The stuff of our lives is a comfort. We look up at the shelves and we see old friends. Yes, there are books on my shelves that aren’t my friends, that I haven’t finished or even started, but someday I will, I promise—my home library is a physical manifestation of ambivalence. There is comfort in the continuity of seeing the same books year after year. I guess there might be some of the same pleasure in scrolling through a digital library or music playlist, but somehow I think something will be lost.
For years audiophiles(音响爱好者)have tried to persuade more casual music fans that a vinyl record played on a decent sound system sounds better than a digital recording played on the same system. Digital sound is not as warm, not as seductive to the ear. The resurgence, albeit modest, of vinyl, especially among young listeners and musicians, proves that this argument is not generational. It’s not, in other words, just old fogies versus young hipsters.
Something of the same argument might be made for books, or for the tactile(触觉的)pleasure of holding and reading a well-made book. At its simplest, a book is a tool, or an information-delivery system, if you will, and it does what it does supremely well. To conceive of a world without physical books is to conceive of a world somehow diminished. It may be more efficient—yes, you can take a "stack" of books on vacation with an e-reader. It may spare quite a few forests from the ax. But efficiency is no substitute for pleasure. The future may be less cluttered. It may also be less fun.
The author was taught the idea that books are______.
选项
A、more cherished by previous people
B、mostly stored in public libraries for free reading
C、luxuries for people when they were young
D、valuable for people to collect and treasure
答案
D
解析
细节归纳题。定位句阐述了作者对传统书籍的看法,即书是有价值的东西,值得喜欢和珍藏。由此可知答案为D)。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/FYQFFFFM
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
A、Thecourseisforbeginners.B、Thedaytimelessonsaremorepopular.C、Thecoursewon’tbeginuntilAugust11.D、Thecourseis
Inthe1960s,manypeopleinNorthAmericaturnedtheirattentiontoenvironmentalproblems,andnewsteel-and-glassskyscrapers
WhiteHouse,official【S1】______ofthepresidentoftheU.S.,builtinitsoriginalformbetween1792and1800,and【S2】______inW
A、Windows.B、Aspecializedsoftware.C、MS-DOS.D、Notmentioned.C题目询问哪一个是IBM几乎所有个人电脑的标准操作系统。关键是听到“MS-DOS成为了IBM几乎所有个人电脑的标准操作系统”,
A、560-1288.B、560-1828.C、560-2187.D、560-1287.D数字细节题。四个选项都是表示数字的词。女士询问男士的电话号码和传真号码,男士告诉了她,女士又重复了一次。注意听清问题问的是phonenumber,而不是f
A、Customerscantestthecomfortofanexpensiveitem.B、Consumersarereluctanttobuysomeproductsonline.C、Customerscanen
A、Anartmuseum.B、Abeautifulpark.C、Acollegecampus.D、Anarchitecturalexhibition.C细节题。选项表明对话内容与谈论场景话题有关系,提到的场景有博物馆,公园,校园,
Thepassagegivesexamplesofsometypicalbloggerstodescribebloggingasanewwayofonlineperformance.Althoughthereare
IwasstudyingtheateratSouthernMethodistUniversityinDallasandfeeling【B1】______anduncertainaboutmyfuture.WillIbe
A、NotgiveanysuggestionstoJack.B、NotseeJackanymore.C、NotlistentoJack’swords.D、NotsavehiswordsonJack.A男士说:我告
随机试题
影响行政系统的政治环境包括三个因素,分别是()
阅读《前赤壁赋》中的一段文字,然后回答问题。况吾与子渔樵于江渚之上,侣鱼虾而友麋鹿,驾一叶之扁舟,举匏樽以相属。寄蜉蝣于天地,渺沧海之一粟。哀吾生之须臾,羡长江之无穷。挟飞仙以遨游,抱明月而长终。知不可乎骤得,托遗响于悲风。这段文字突出的艺术
符合甲状腺功能亢进症代谢率增高的表现是
下列有关普萘洛尔的描述错误的是
曹某,45岁,失血性休克,正在进行扩容疗法,中心静脉压监测为0.49kPa(5cmH2O),血压9.3/6.7kPa(70/50mmHg),应( )。【历年考试真题】
室外消火栓按其进水口的公称通径可分为()。
外国人前往不对外国人开放的地区旅行,必须向当地旅游行政管理部门申请旅行证件,由旅游者临时居留地或工作地的市、县旅游行政管理部门办理。()
在东海大学研究生会举办的一次中国象棋比赛中,来自经济学院、管理学院、哲学学院、数学学院和化学学院的5名研究生(每学院1名)相遇在一起。有关甲、乙、丙、丁、戊5名研究生之间的比赛信息满足以下条件:(1)甲仅与2名选手比赛过;(2)化学学院
NeverGiveUp永不言弃Writeanessayof160-200wordsbasedonthedrawing.Inyouressay,youshould1)describethedrawingbriefl
Wheredidthemanleavehisglasses?
最新回复
(
0
)