These days we hear lots of nonsense about the "great classless society. " The idea that the twentieth century is the age of the

admin2019-08-17  4

问题     These days we hear lots of nonsense about the "great classless society. " The idea that the twentieth century is the age of the common man has become one of the great cliches of our time. The same old arguments are put forward in evidence. Here are some of them: monarchy as a system of government has been completely discarded. In a number of countries the victory has been complete. The people rule; the great millennium has become a political realty. But has it? Close examination doesn’t bear out the claim.
    It is a fallacy to suppose that all men are equal and that society will be leveled out if you provided everybody with the same education opportunities. The fact is that nature dispenses brains and ability with a total disregard for the principle of equality. The old rules of the jungle, survival of the fittest, and might is right are still with us. The spread of education has destroyed the old class system and created a new one. Rewards are based on merits. For aristocracy read "meritocracy"; in other respects, society remains unaltered: the class system is rigidly maintained.
    What is the first thing people do when they become rich? They use their wealth to secure the best possible opportunities for their children, to give them a good start in life. For all the lip service we pay to the idea of equality, we do not consider this wrong in the western world. Private schools that offer unfair advantages over state schools are not banned. In this way, the new meritocracy can perpetuate itself to a certain extent: an able child from a wealthy home can succeed far more rapidly than his poorer counterpart. Wealth is also used indiscriminately to further political ends. It would be almost impossible to become the leader of a democracy without massive financial backing. Money is as powerful a weapon as ever it was.
    In societies wholly dedicated to the principle of social equality, privileged private education is forbidden. But even here people are rewarded according to their abilities. In fact, so great is the need for skilled workers that the least able may be neglected. Bright children are carefully and expensively trained to become future rulers. In the end, political ideologies boil down to the same thing: class divisions persist whether you are ruled by a feudal king or an educated peasant.
Which the following statements is Not true according Paragraph 3?

选项 A、Private schools offer unfair advantages over state schools.
B、Wealth is also used indiscriminately to further political ends.
C、With massive financial support it would be easier to become the leader of a democracy.
D、An able child from a poor home can succeed far more rapidly than his richer counterpart.

答案D

解析 事实细节题。第三段第四句讲到,提供不公平优势的私立学校没有被禁止,A项表述正确。第六句讲到,财富被不加区别的用于政治目的,B项表述正确。第七句讲到,如果没有大规模的财政支持,要成为一个民主国家的领导人几乎是不可能的,C项表述正确。第五句提到,一个来自富裕家庭的有能力的孩子能够比能力相当的穷孩子更快地获得成功,D项表述与原文相反。本题为选非题,故D项为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/EWVUFFFM
0

最新回复(0)