首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How science goes wrong Scientific research has changed the world. Now it needs to change itself. [A] A simple idea underlies
How science goes wrong Scientific research has changed the world. Now it needs to change itself. [A] A simple idea underlies
admin
2017-12-08
54
问题
How science goes wrong
Scientific research has changed the world. Now it needs to change itself.
[A] A simple idea underlies science: "trust, but verify". Results should always be subject to challenge from experiment. That simple but powerful idea has generated a vast body of knowledge. Since its birth in the 17th century, modern science has changed the world beyond recognition, and overwhelmingly for the better. But success can breed extreme self-satisfaction. Modern scientists are doing too much trusting and not enough verifying, damaging the whole of science, and of humanity.
[B] Too many of the findings are the result of cheap experiments or poor analysis. A rule of thumb among biotechnology venture-capitalists is that half of published research cannot be replicated (复制). Even that may be optimistic. Last year researchers at one biotech firm, Amgen, found they could reproduce just six of 53 "milestone" studies in cancer research. Earlier, a group at Bayer, a drug company, managed to repeat just a quarter of 67 similarly important papers. A leading computer scientist worries that three-quarters of papers in his subfield are nonsense. In 2000-10, roughly 80,000 patients took part in clinical trials based on research that was later withdrawn because of mistakes or improperness.
What a load of rubbish
[C] Even when flawed research does not put people’s lives at risk—and much of it is too far from the market to do so—it blows money and the efforts of some of the world’s best minds. The opportunity costs of hindered progress are hard to quantify, but they are likely to be vast. And they could be rising.
[D] One reason is the competitiveness of science. In the 1950s, when modern academic research took shape after its successes in the Second World War, it was still a rarefied (小众的) pastime. The entire club of scientists numbered a few hundred thousand. As their ranks have swelled to 6m-7m active researchers on the latest account, scientists have lost their taste for self-policing and quality control. The obligation to "publish or perish (消亡)" has come to rule over academic life. Competition for jobs is cut-throat. Full professors in America earned on average $135,000 in 2012—more than judges did. Every year six freshly minted PhDs strive for every academic post. Nowadays verification (the replication of other people’s results) does little to advance a researcher’s career. And without verification, uncertain findings live on to mislead.
[E] Careerism also encourages exaggeration and the choose-the-most-profitable of results. In order to safeguard their exclusivity, the leading journals impose high rejection rates: in excess of 90% of submitted manuscripts. The most striking findings have the greatest chance of making it onto the page. Little wonder that one in three researchers knows of a colleague who has polished a paper by, say, excluding inconvenient data from results based on his instinct. And as more research teams around the world work on a problem, it is more likely that at least one will fall prey to an honest confusion between the sweet signal of a genuine discovery and a nut of the statistical noise. Such fake correlations are often recorded in journals eager for startling papers. If they touch on drinking wine, or letting children play video games, they may well command the front pages of newspapers, too.
[F] Conversely, failures to prove a hypothesis (假设) are rarely even offered for publication, let alone accepted. "Negative results" now account for only 14% of published papers, down from 30% in 1990. Yet knowing what is false is as important to science as knowing what is true. The failure to report failures means that researchers waste money and effort exploring blind alleys already investigated by other scientists.
[G] The holy process of peer review is not all it is praised to be, either. When a prominent medical journal ran research past other experts in the field, it found that most of the reviewers failed to spot mistakes it had deliberately inserted into papers, even after being told they were being tested.
If it’s broke, fix it
[H] All this makes a shaky foundation for an enterprise dedicated to discovering the truth about the world. What might be done to shore it up? One priority should be for all disciplines to follow the example of those that have done most to tighten standards. A start would be getting to grips with statistics, especially in the growing number of fields that screen through untold crowds of data looking for patterns. Geneticists have done this, and turned an early stream of deceptive results from genome sequencing (基因组测序) into a flow of truly significant ones.
[I] Ideally, research protocols (草案) should be registered in advance and monitored in virtual notebooks. This would curb the temptation to manipulate the experiment’s design midstream so as to make the results look more substantial than they are. (It is already meant to happen in clinical trials of drugs.) Where possible, trial data also should be open for other researchers to inspect and test.
[J] The most enlightened journals are already showing less dislike of tedious papers. Some government funding agencies, including America’s National Institutes of Health, which give out $30 billion on research each year, are working out how best to encourage replication. And growing numbers of scientists, especially young ones, understand statistics. But these trends need to go much further. Journals should allocate space for "uninteresting" work, and grant-givers should set aside money to pay for it. Peer review should be tightened—or perhaps dispensed with altogether, in favour of post-publication evaluation in the form of appended comments. That system has worked well in recent years in physics and mathematics. Lastly, policymakers should ensure that institutions using public money also respect the rules.
[K] Science still commands enormous—if sometimes perplexed—respect. But its privileged status is founded on the capacity to be right most of the time and to correct its mistakes when it gets things wrong. And it is not as if the universe is short of genuine mysteries to keep generations of scientists hard at work. The false trails laid down by cheap research are an unforgivable barrier to understanding.
The major journals reject more than 90% of the submitted manuscripts to ensure their exclusiveness.
选项
答案
E
解析
本题涉及学术造假的环境因素,可知答案应在What a load of rubbish标题下的内容查找。本题提到了各主流期刊为了确保自己的质量而设定极高的退稿率,由题干中的数字90%和exclusiveness可快速定位到E段第2句,原文提到主流期刊都设有高达90%的退稿率,题中ensure对应原文的safeguard,而exclusiveness则对应exclusivity,故本题选E。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/DdUFFFFM
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteashortessayentitledItIsMeaningfultoLearnfromPastMistakesbycommen
A、Sydney.B、Paris.C、Tokyo.D、NewYorkCity.C短文提到,新加坡取代去年位于榜首的东京,成为生活成本最高的城市,故选C。
中国实施九年制义务教育,也就是说,所有的孩子必须上学读九年书,完成小学和初中的学业。小学是六年制。在学校,学生上语文、初等算术和德育等课程。此外,还有体育课和课外活动(extra-curricularactivities)。外语,如英语,在小学高年级是选
Ironproductionwasrevolutionizedintheearlyeighteenthcenturywhencokewasfirstusedinsteadofcharcoal(木炭)forrefining
Adegreefromacollegeoruniversityisoftenakeythatopensdoorsof【B1】______—doorstoabetterjobandabetterlife.With
Ifyouwipeafingeracrossahouseholdsurfacethathasn’tbeencleanedinthelastfewdays,chancesareyou’ll【B1】______with
A、Henry’sfriendskickeditbecausetheywereveryexcited.B、Henryaccidentallydroppedit.C、OneofHenry’sfriendsbumpedint
A、Shewasquestionedbythepolice.B、Shewasshutinasmallroomfor20minutes.C、Shewasinsultedbytheshoppersaroundher
A、Districtmanagers.B、Regularcustomers.C、Salesdirectors.D、Seniorclerks.A短文一开始就提到AlexGordon期待与公司区域经理的第一次会议。因此答案为A。B“常客”、D
随机试题
爱岗敬业的具体要求是()。
Bionicsisarecentlydevelopedbranchofscience,whichhastremendouspotentialforimprovingthelifeofmankindinourconte
丹毒的致病菌为
某单层木器厂房为砖木结构,屋顶承重构件为难燃性构件,耐火极限为0.5h;柱子采用不燃性构件,耐火极限为2.50h。木器厂房建筑面积为4500m2,其总平面布局和平面布置如下图所示;木器厂房周边的建筑,面向木器厂房一侧的外墙上均没有门和窗。该木器厂房采用流水
江苏环球国际贸易有限公司(320196××××)受南京××大学(3201990000)委托向海关申报进口设备一批,装载货物的运输工具于2009年3月29日申报进境。2009年4月2日江苏环球国际贸易有限公司持入境货物通关单(编号:3201001091542
以不同资产类别的收益情况与投资人的风险偏好、实际需求为基础,构造一定风险水平上的资产比例,并保持长期不变。这种资产配置方式是()。
垄断组织获取垄断利润的主要手段是垄断技术。()
治安管理处罚的原则是()。
内部网关协议包括()。
Thesunroseuponatranquilworld,andbeameddownuponthepeacefulvillagelikeabenediction.Breakfastover,AuntPollyhad
最新回复
(
0
)