首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Directions: A report revealing the reduced role of the English test in China’s college entrance examination has drawn much publi
Directions: A report revealing the reduced role of the English test in China’s college entrance examination has drawn much publi
admin
2017-11-28
46
问题
Directions: A report revealing the reduced role of the English test in China’s college entrance examination has drawn much public attention. In some provinces, the English test score has been reduced from 150 to 100, and by 2020, the English test will be removed from China’s college entrance exam, according to the Ministry of Education. The students will instead be allowed to take two exams a year and pick the best result for their college admission. What do you think of this test reform and what’s the possible effect it may produce on our English teaching and learning? Write a composition of about 400 words to clarify your own points of view about this topic You should use your own ideas, knowledge or experience to generate support for your argument Write your answer on the answer sheet (30 points)
Note: In the first part of your writing you should state clearly the thesis statement (i. e., your main argument), and in the second part you should support your argument with appropriate details. In the last part you should bring what you have written to a natural conclusion or a summary. Marks will be awarded for content, organization, grammar and appropriateness. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks.
选项
答案
It is reported that in some provinces of China, the English test score has been reduced from 150 to 100 in the national college entrance examination, known as "Gaokao". And the Ministry of Education has also worked out a plan for phasing out the English test from the "Gaokao" system. Instead, the English test will be held twice a year to allow students in senior high school to choose the best score for their college admission. Such changes made in the English test have aroused a heated discussion among educators, students and parents. Opinions are divided on this test reform. Some people view reducing English weight in overall admissions test scores as a strong measure to cool down nationwide English mania and reverse the prevailing practice in school that gives emphasis to English over Chinese, while others doubt whether the reform would reduce students’ burden of learning English or whether the substitute test could reflect students English skills and help students learn English better. As far as I’m concerned, the test reform is a positive move toward a better "Gaokao" system. The main reason for my point is that the reform changes China’s once-in-a-lifetime exam system by giving students more test-taking chances. As is known to us all, "Gaokao" is the principal method by which most students enter almost all higher education institutions in China, and their performance in the exam will influence them a lot. However, there were always people who were good at English but unluckily performed poorly in the English exam. Owing to this reform, such people can take the English exam for several times and avoid the worst result for their college admission. Therefore, it is no exaggeration to say that this test reform makes the "Gaokao" system more fair and reasonable. What’s more, the change in scores will help relieve students from heavy academic burdens. For many students who are not interested in English, it’s unnecessary for them to spend so much time studying it, and for those who have a passion for English, they can study it in college. Of course, reducing the weight of English in the entrance exam doesn’t mean English is no longer important for Chinese students. Instead, the reform makes us reconsider the proper way for English teaching and learning. The low-end and exam-oriented English teaching and learning has come under heavy criticism for making most English learners dabblers. Indeed, English learners are not taught to gain high scores in tests, but to master the language in a real sense. Therefore, English teaching and learning must be reoriented to lay due emphasis on using English in real life.
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/BswUFFFM
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
Asarule,what’sefficientinoneplacewillbeefficientinmostotherplaces,thusAmericanbusinessesarefiercecompetitors
Pleasereflectonthefollowingopinionandwriteanessayofabout400wordselaboratingyourviewwithawell-definedtitle.
Itisnotcompatiblewiththeegalitarianidealthatthereshouldbesharpdifferencesinthescaleofmonetaryrewardforservi
Inadditiontourgetoconformwhichwegenerateourselves,thereistheexternalpressureofthevariousformalandinformalgr
Asteadyflowofthe______weaponsspreaditsgenialinfluencethroughoutthefrontier,andtherespectwhichthePathantribesm
Thosenaughtyboyswerepunishedbecausetheywerecaught______flowersinthegarden.
Thetemperatureofthesunisover5,000degreesFahrenheitatthesurface,butitrisestoperhapsmorethan16milliondegree
Evenat25years’distancefromthatworld-changingevent,thefalloftheBerlinWall,whatinspiresadmirationisthecivilise
[A]Afteralongbreak,onlinebooksellerAmazonisbacktryingtoencourageustoreadinanewway.ItsWebsitenowfeatures
Themothersaidshewould______hersonwashingthedishesifhecouldfinishhisassignmentbeforesupper.
随机试题
被评估设备购建于2000年,原始价值300万元,2005年进行更新改造,投入了30万元。2008年对该设备进行评估,假设从2000年至2008年该类设备的价格每年上升10%,该设备的尚可使用年限经检测为15年,则该设备的成新率约为()
桥粒具有哪些功能
由于孕酮水平升高,妊娠期龈炎患者的龈下菌斑中细菌组成发生变化,主要龈下优势菌是
含有芳氧羧酸结构的调血脂药是
一般情况下,建设项目的环境影响评价包括()以上的单项影响评价。
下列关于涵洞构造的说法,正确的是()。
甲委托乙为其购买木材,乙为此花去了一定的时间和精力,现甲不想要这批木材,于是电话告诉乙取消委托,乙不同意。根据合同法律制度的规定,下列表述中,正确的是()。
下列选项中,未经履行出资人职责的机构同意,国有独资公司不得进行的行为有()。
成语“草木皆兵”反映的历史事件是()。
某公司永续EBIT为500万元,无杠杆情况下收益率为10%,又已知公司可以借入500万元债务以回购部分股票,改变公司的资本结构,公司所得税率为25%。求:有税MM理论下,所有者权益为多少?税盾效应为多少?
最新回复
(
0
)