首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitti
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitti
admin
2009-03-16
16
问题
How efficient is our system of criminal trial? Does it really do the basic job we ask of it — convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent? It is often said that the British trial system is more like a game than a serious attempt to do justice. The lawyers on each side are so engrossed in playing bard to win, Challenging each other and the judge on technical points, that the object of finding out the truth is almost forgotten. All the effort is concentrated on the big day, on the dramatic cross examination of the key Witnesses in front of the jury. Critics like to compare our "adversarial" system (resembling two adversaries engaged in a contest) with the continental "inquisitorial" system, under which the judge play a more important inquiring role.
In early times, in the Middle Ages, the systems of trial across Europe were similar. At that time trial by "ordeal" — especially a religious event — was the main way of testing guilt or innocence. When this way eventually abandoned the two systems parted company. On the continent church-trained legal officials took over the function of both prosecuting and judging, while in England these were largely left to lay people, the Justice of the Peace and the jurymen who were illiterate and this meant that all the evidence had to be put to them orally. This historical accident dominates procedure even today, with all evidence being given in open court by word of mouth on the crucial day.
On the other hand, in France for instance, all the evidence is written before the trial under supervision by an investigating judge. This exhaustive pretrial looks very undramatic; much of its is just a public checking of the written records already gathered.
The Americans adopted the British system lock, stock and barrel and enshrined it in their constitution. But, while the basic features of our systems are common, there are now significant differences in the way serious cases are handled. First, because the USA has virtually no contempt of court laws to prevent pretrial publicity in the newspaper and on television, Americans lawyers are allowed to question jurors about knowledge and beliefs.
In Britain this is virtually never allowed, and a random selection of jurors who are presumed not to be prejudiced are empanelled. Secondly, there is no separate profession of barrister in the United States, and both prosecution and defense lawyers who are to present cases in court prepare themselves. They go out and visit the scene, track down and interview witnesses, and familiarize themselves personally with the background. In Britain it is the solicitor who prepares the case, and the barrister who appears in court is not even allowed to meet witnesses beforehand. British barristers also alternate doing both prosecution and defense work. Being kept distant from the preparation and regularly appearing for both sides, barristers are said to avoid becoming too personally involved, and can approach cases more dispassionately. American lawyers, however, often know their cases better.
Reformers rightly want to learn from other countries’ mistakes and successes. But what is clear is that justice systems, largely because they are the result of long historical growth, are peculiarly difficult to adapt piecemeal.
选项
A、the British legal system can do the basic job well — convicting the guilty and acquitting the innocent
B、the British legal system is worse than the continental legal system
C、the British legal system is often considered to be not very fair
D、tbe British legal system is very efficient
答案
C
解析
句意推测题。由句中game(游戏)与a serious attempt to do justice(实现正义的严肃尝试)之间的对比关系及这一段后文对于英国审判过程的描述可以推知[C]对。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/7LBsFFFM
本试题收录于:
公共英语四级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语四级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
Allinternationalchainschoolsteachmanydifferentlanguages.
PaulStraussmann,retiredvicepresidentofXerox,indicatesinhisbookInformationPay-offthat"almosthalfoftheU.S.info
Impatiencecharacterizesyoungintellectualworkers.Theywanttomaketheirmark【31】______.Soit’simportanttoget【32】______t
Childrenwhogriptheirpenstooclosetothewritingpointarelikelytobeatadisadvantageinexaminations,【31】______tothe
Childrenwhogriptheirpenstooclosetothewritingpointarelikelytobeatadisadvantageinexaminations,【31】______tothe
Wherewastheletterprobablyplacedmanyyearsago?
Mirrorimagesisoftendifferentfromthe"feltimages".
WhatwastheAmericaneconomicsystembasedonuntil1930?
A=SectionAB=SectionBC=SectionCSectionAEngineeringstudentsaresupposedtobepracticallyandrationally
Payandproductivity,itisgenerallyassumed,shouldberelated.Buttherelationshipseemstoweaken【C1】______peoplegetolder
随机试题
某患者误食青鱼胆一周后出现少尿、无尿,眼睑浮肿的表现,查体:血清肌酐、尿素氮均明显升高Na+138n~nol/L,K+6.0mmol/L;有肢体抽搐现象;心率56次/分钟,心电图示存在房室传导阻滞、室性早搏和T波高尖的改变,其他无明显异常。此患者存在哪
请朗诵毛泽东的《沁园春.雪》,并说说它的现实意义。
将顾客服务分为交易前、交易中和交易后三阶段的教授是()
符合B型慢性萎缩性胃炎的是
A、加间苯三酚和盐酸试液,显红色或紫红色B、加碘液显棕黄色,加硝酸汞显砖红色C、加碘液显蓝色或紫色D、加氯化锌碘显蓝色或紫色E、加硫酸无变化木质化细胞壁()
信号量的值()。
政府对在海洋中任何地点排放污物的禁令依据的是他们相信洋流会导致污物扩散对人类造成危害。由于还不清楚倾倒在海底——远离海岸的污物是否会产生危害,这项禁令应该被修订以仅适用于海岸海水。下面除了哪项,如果正确,都能支持在海洋排污的禁令应该被修订的结论?
我国对于社会团体的成立实行()。
桑格格是一位畅销书作家,很多人都看过她的那本自传体小说《小时候》。但是桑格格很不愿意把自己的身份定位在作家这一角色上面,她说,我还想做很多事情呢。的确,在桑格格过往的人生中,她做过演员、电台的节目主持人、广告模特等。有人问她:你怎么能做这么多事情
HeartAttackThroughouttheUnitedStates,andespeciallyinbigcitiesandruralareas,tensofthousandsofpeoplewithhearts
最新回复
(
0
)