首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
During the first 70 years of the 20th century, inequality declined and Americans prospered together. Over the last 30 years, by
During the first 70 years of the 20th century, inequality declined and Americans prospered together. Over the last 30 years, by
admin
2011-03-10
40
问题
During the first 70 years of the 20th century, inequality declined and Americans prospered together. Over the last 30 years, by contrast, the United States developed the most unequal distribution of income and wages of any high-income country.
Some analysts see the gulf between the rich and the rest as an incentive for strivers, or as just the way things are. Others see it as having a corrosive effect on people’s faith in the markets and democracy. Still others contend that economic polarization is a root cause of America’s political polarization. Could, and should, something be done?
Claudia Goldin and Lawrence F. Katz, two Harvard economists, think yes. Their book, the Race Between Education and Technology (Harvard, $ 39.95), contain many tables, a few equations and a powerfully told story about how and why the United States became the world’s richest nation--namely, thanks to its schools.
The authors skillfully demonstrate that for more than a century, and at a steady rate, technological breakthroughs--the mass production system, electricity, computers--have been increasing the demand for ever more educated workers. And, they show, America’s school system met this demand, not with a national policy, but in grassroots fashion, as communities taxed themselves and built schools and colleges.
If only it were that easy.
The authors’ argument is really two books in one. One offers an incisive history of American education, especially the spread of the public high school and the state university system. It proves to be an uplifting tale of public commitment and open access. The authors remind us that the United States long remained "the best poor man’s country". A place where talent could rise.
The other story rigorously measures the impact of education on income. The authors’ compilation of hard data on educational attainment according to when people were bona is an awesome achievement, though not always a gripping read.
They show that by the 1850s, America’s school enrollment rate already "exceeded that of any other nation". And this lead held for a long time. By 1960, some 70 percent of Americans graduated from high school--far above the rate in any other country. College graduation rates also rose.
In the marketplace, such educational attainment was extremely valuable, but it didn’t produce wide economic disparity so long as more people were coming to the job market with education. The Wage premium-- or differential paid to people with a high school or a college education--fell between 1915 and 1950.
But more recently, high school graduation rates flatlined at around 70 percent. American college attendance roses, though college graduation rates languished. The upshot is that while the average college graduates in 1970 earned 45 percent more than high school graduates, the differential three decades later exceeds 80 percent.
"In the first half of the century," the authors summarize, "education raced of technology, but later in the century technology raced ahead of educational gains."
Proving that the demand for and supply of educated workers began not in the time of Bill Gates but in the era of Thomas Edison is virtuoso social science. But wasn’t a slowdown in rising educational attainment unavoidable? After all, it’s one thing to increase the average years of schooling by leaps and bounds when most people start near zero, but quite another when national average is already high.
The authors reject the idea that the United States has reached some natural limit in educational advances. Other countries are now at higher levels.
What, then, is holding American youth back?
The authors give a two-part answer. For one thing, the financial aid system is a maze. More important, many people with high school diplomas are not ready for college.
The second problem, the authors write, is concentrated mostly in inner-city schools. Because the poor cannot easily move to better school districts, the authors allow that charter schools as well as vouchers, including those for private school, could be helpful, but more evaluation is necessary.
Data on the effects of preschool are plentiful, and point to large returns on investment, so the authors join the chorus in extolling Head Start, the federal government’s largest preschool program.
Providing more children with a crucial start, along with easier ways to find financial aid, are laudable national objectives. One suspects, though, that the obstacles to getting more young people into and through college have to do with knotty social and cultural issues.
But assume that the author’s policies would raise the national college graduation rate. Would that deeply reduce inequality?
Averages can be deceptive. Most of the gains of the recent flush decades have not gone to the college-educated as a whole. The top 10 or 20 percent by income have education levels roughly equivalent to those in the top 1 percent, but the latter account for much of the boom in inequality. This appears to be related to the way taxed have been cut, and to the ballooning of the financial industry’s share of corporate profits.
It remains to be seen how a reconfigured financial industry and possible new tax policies might affect the 30-year trend toward greater inequality.
In the meantime, it is nice to be reminded, in a data-rich book, that greater investments in human capital once put Americans collectively on top of the world.
When can be learned from the book entitled The Race Between Education and Technology?
选项
A、The wage movements in the U.S. are dominated by swings in the demand for education-related skills.
B、The American educational system is what made American the richest nation in the world.
C、Technology raced ahead of education in the first half of the 20th century.
D、American high school graduation rates leveled off at 80 percent in 1970.
答案
B
解析
这道题目的答案可以在第三段最后一句中找到。“Their book...told story about how and why the United States became the world’s richest nation——namely, thanks to its school”,因此答案为B,文中出现的那本书的中心思想就是教育在美国发展过程中的作用。选项A在文中并未提到;从第十三段中可以得知,科技发展超过教育发展是在20世纪后半期,而不是在20世纪初,因此选项C是错误的;选项D原文中并未提及,因此不正确,所以本题答案为B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/5GpYFFFM
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
AcupunctureRecently,acupuncturehasbecomea【1】______wordinAmerica.【1】______Acupuncturewasperformedi
Sofar,inflationisroaringinonlyafewsectorsoftheeconomy.Whileplatinumhassoared121percent,soybeanshaverisen11
BenBuchananandAMagicBookTheTexasteenisdevouringthe672pagesofHarryPotterandtheHalf-BloodPrincewrittenby
AttendingaCollegeorUniversityintheUSAEachyear,manyforeignstudentswishtogotothecollegesanduniversitiesin
AttendingaCollegeorUniversityintheUSAEachyear,manyforeignstudentswishtogotothecollegesanduniversitiesin
AttendingaCollegeorUniversityintheUSAEachyear,manyforeignstudentswishtogotothecollegesanduniversitiesin
Cosmologyissometimespooh-poohedasmorephilosophythanscience.Itasksdeepquestionsaboutnaturebutprovidesunsatisfyin
A、upholdthedomesticpoliciesoftheBushAdministration.B、caremoreaboutfamilyvaluesthantheissueofabortion.C、arecon
A、Monday.B、Tuesday.C、Thursday.D、Friday.A
A、Monday.B、Wednesday.C、Saturday.D、Sunday.B新闻中多次提到时间,需仔细辨别。
随机试题
风湿性心瓣膜病二尖瓣狭窄,X线检查常见表现是
IgE()
微需氧菌专性需氧菌
“称定”“约”
关于无权代理的选项中正确的是( )。
截至2011年,我国被列入《世界遗产名录》的有()处。
应当逮捕的犯罪嫌疑人如果在逃,县级以上公安机关在自己管辖的地区内,()发布通辑令。
中国共产党历史上具有重大转折性意义的会议共有三个,分别是八七会议、遵义会议和中共十一届三中全会。其中,八七会议和遵义会议的共同之处有
下列叙述中,错误的是(13)。
下列包中,包含JoptionPane类的是()。
最新回复
(
0
)