2. 考研
  3. Nobody pretends that polluted air isn’t terrible for your health. Clean up the skies over any dirty city, and the people who liv

Nobody pretends that polluted air isn’t terrible for your health. Clean up the skies over any dirty city, and the people who liv

admin2021-02-21  54
问题    Nobody pretends that polluted air isn’t terrible for your health. Clean up the skies over any dirty city, and the people who live there will all but certainly become healthier. According to a study just published, when local governments decide to remove the smog, local residents actually live an average of five months longer.
   In order to reach so precise a finding, the study’s authors had to do some exhaustive number-crunching, surveying pollution rates and longevity in 51 cities across the U.S. over a 21-year period. Overall, they found that lifespan in all of the areas increased by an average of nearly three years—from 74 to 77—as a result of a host of factors, most notably reduced smoking and improved income. But 15% of the change was attributable to cleaner air.
   One of the reasons making air cleaner can have so immediate an effect is that even a little dirt can do a lot of damage. A reduction of just 10 micrograms of pollution per cubic meter of air—a degree of improvement many of the surveyed cities were able to attain during the two-decade-plus period—could extend human life-spans a full nine months. How small is 10 micrograms per cubic meter? Consider that simply by living with a cigarette smoker, you’re exposed to a daily dose of 20 to 30.
   Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for example, is one city in the survey that was at the 30-microgram level before the decline of the steel industry in the 1980s drove the dirt out of the skies—even as it drove jobs out of town. Pittsburgh was one of the biggest winners in the new study, with residents gaining roughly 10 months in life expectancy over what they had when the mills were still churning.
   The benefits of cleaner air may even be felt in towns whose skies weren’t that dirty to begin with. Those that began with the very lowest levels still saw health benefits from small improvements. The evidence isn’t yet there to determine whether those benefits would continue growing until the fine-particle pollution got down to zero; one of the cities closest to that, Albuquerque, New Mexico, still hovers around 5 micrograms per cubic meter. But at this point, it doesn’t seem that the benefits decrease. "If it continues to follow what we’ve observed, it appears that there are health benefits down to very low levels of exposure," says Dr. Pope, the study’s lead author.
   The next step for both researchers and policymakers is determining which sources of dirt—power plants, motor vehicles, other industrial polluters—make the biggest contributions to particle levels and thus should be most aggressively targeted. "In a difficult economic situation," asks Dr. Douglas Dockery, "where can we spend the dollars that would have the most benefit?"
   As with so many other things, President Barack Obama’s coming into power has people hoping that these kinds of questions will be more aggressively addressed than they were over the past eight years. Even during the most heated days of the fall campaign, neither candidate went so far as to promise longer life in exchange for a vote. But a smart environmental policy could deliver just that.
   [A] benefited from the downturn in its steel industry.
   [B] won the presidential election mainly by promising to increase American people’s lifespan.
   [C] can still see benefits of air improvement despite its already clean air.
   [D] took measures to improve its air quality after 1980s.
   [E] is supposed to take active steps to tackle environmental problems including air pollution.
   [F] shows concern about which sources of dirt contribute most to air pollution.
   [G] agrees that even improvement in slightly polluted air may bring health benefits.
Barack Obama
选项
答案E
解析 Barack Obama出现在最后一段。该段说，奥巴马总统的上台与其他诸多因素使人们希望，与过去8年相比，新政府能更积极地解决诸如此类的问题。E中的take active steps to tackle是原文be more aggressively addressed的语态转换，environmental problems including air pollution即本段中these kinds of questions指代的内容，故确定E为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/18pRFFFM
0

考研英语二

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)