首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective.
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective.
admin
2022-06-18
44
问题
Municipal
bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective. But are all smoking bans equally successful?
The barkeeper and blogger who writes as "Scribbler50" was outraged when, in 2003, New York City enacted one of the first comprehensive smoking bans in bars and restaurants, "How can a guy and some board just kick us in the teeth like this? This smacks of fascism." If people are aware of the consequences of smoking or visiting places with lots of secondhand smoke, should the government really have to tell us what to do? Won’t people just vote with their feet and smoke even more when they’re at home and away from restrictions?
Scribbler50’s post inspired the physician who blogs as "PalMD" last week to look up the research on the effectiveness of smoking bans. He found several studies showing that not only did workers in restaurants and bars show improved health shortly after the bans were put in place, but smokers themselves also reduced the number of cigarettes they smoked.
Overall, however, smoking rates remain persistently high, despite the common workplace smoking bans. Can other government measures help these smokers live healthier lives, or at least prevent people from taking up the habit?
In the U.S., warning messages have been in place on cigarette packages for decades. But the messages are rather clinical, for example: "Smoking Causes Lung Cancer, Heart Disease, and May Complicate Pregnancy." What if packages contained more dramatic warnings? In January, psychologist and science writer Christian Jarrett looked at a small study of smokers’ reactions to cigarette warnings. The researchers measured self-esteem in student smokers, then showed them cigarette packages with either death-related warnings ("Smokers die earlier") or esteem-related warnings ("Smoking makes you unattractive"). Students who derived self-esteem from smoking and saw the death-related warnings later viewed smoking more positively than those who saw the esteem-related warnings. For students whose smoking wasn’t motivated by self-esteem, the effect was reversed.
So not all anti-smoking messages are equal: Depending on who the message is directed at, a morbid warning on a cigarette label may actually
backfire
.
Scribbler50 for his part, is now a convert favoring smoking restrictions, at least in his narrow limits as a bartender. His patrons who haven’t quit smoking say they smoke a lot less now that they have to go outside to get a nicotine fix. He doesn’t miss emptying ashtrays, or the holier-than-thou customers who complained every time a fellow patron lit up, or working in a smoke-filled bar all night and going home "smelling like you put out a three-alarm".
Would it be right to enact even more restrictions on smoking in the interest of public health? It’s hard to deny that banning smoking in public, indoor spaces has been a huge success. Why not try out some stronger smoking bans? Parents in some areas are already restricted from smoking in cars with children, but I haven’t seen a study that evaluates the success of those measures. Perhaps a state or municipality could try extending the ban to homes, with provisions for studying the results. It’s also possible that stronger measures would be counter-productive, like the stronger warnings on cigarette labels. Maybe we’ll decide that at some level deciding whether or not to smoke should still be an individual choice. Or maybe in a few generations, it won’t be necessary to regulate smoking: There won’t be any smokers left.
According to the passage, _____ is NOT caused by smoking.
选项
A、miscarriage
B、pollution
C、lung disease
D、heart attack
答案
B
解析
由第5段第2句可知,吸烟的危害包括引发肺癌(对应C)、心脏病(对应D),以及对孕妇产生危害(对应A“流产”),而B“污染”则无提及,故选B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/rSwYFFFM
本试题收录于:
CATTI三级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI三级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
TheChacoPhenomenonP1:Betweenabout900to1150AD,amysteriousStoneAgeculturearose,flourished,andthenvanishedinth
TheEarlyHistoryofMotionPicturesP1:Thetechnologythatmadepossibletheprojectionandexhibitionofphotographedmoving
IssuessurroundingAthedistributionofBincomeareamongCmostcontroversialinDeconomics.
Somepeoplearepracticalanddown-to-earth,while______aredreamers.
1Dementia,ageneraldecreaseinintellectualabilities,involvesimpairmentofmemory,judgment,andsocialfunctioning.Thet
Howdoestheprofessordevelopthetopicoftheviolinfamily?Choosetwoanswers.
Howdoestheprofessordevelopthetopicoftheviolinfamily?Choosetwoanswers.
Whydoesthestudentspeakwiththeman?
Doyouagreeordisagreewiththefollowingstatement?Itisbettertorelaxbywatchingamovieorreadingabookthandoingph
Withlittleornovisualfeedbacktoreinforcethementalmap,avisuallyimpairedpersonmustrelyonmemoryforkeylandmarks
随机试题
关于土地使用权出让错误的是()。
某部队官兵在进餐3/JI、时后,出现以呕吐为主、腹痛腹泻为次的食物中毒,最可能的病原菌是()
女性,36岁。抑郁症患者,高空坠落伤,导致全身多发骨折及软组织挫伤。目前在重症监护病房接受治疗。下列符合严重抑郁症发作基本机制的是
下列哪种情况下应用腹腔镜检查是错误的( )
导致心力衰竭发病和死亡的主要原因是
下列关于应付账款的说法中,错误的是()。
下列内部控制措施中,属于预防式控制的是()。
A注册会计师负责审计甲公司2010年度财务报表。在考虑获取管理层书面声明时,A注册会计师遇到下列事项,请代为作出正确的专业判断。如果甲公司管理层拒绝就其责任的履行情况提供书面声明,下列做法中,A注册会计师认为错误的是()。
Therearetwokindsofsports,teamsportsandindividualsports.Teamsportsaresuchsportsasbaseball,basketballandvolley
SittinginabackroomatLondon’sBarbicanartscenter,whichishostingtheGameOnExhibition,HenryJenkinsdeliversaline
最新回复
(
0
)