首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2016-08-13
35
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such e-valuation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
The author believes that______.
选项
A、many teachers are opposed to the idea of being evaluated by the students
B、students are opposed to the idea of evaluating the teachers on their own
C、students fear that they are likely to be criticized by their teachers if they are to give their assessments
D、many teachers fear that they are likely to criticize the students who have given their assessments
答案
A
解析
参考文章第二段,其中用了两个argue,表明作者认为许多教师是反对由学生评判自己的教课水平的。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/h5jGFFFM
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
SupposeyouworkinabigfirmandfindEnglishveryimportantforyourjobbecauseyouoftendealwithforeignbusinessmen.Now
Cananimalsbemadetoworkforus?Somescientiststhinkthatonedayanimalsmaybetrainedtodoanumberofsimplejobsthat
Yourbody,whichhascloserelationswiththefoodyoueat,isthemostimportantthingyouown,soitneedspropertreatmentan
Despitethefactthattodayviruses(病毒)areknowntocausecancerinanimalsandincertainplants,thereexistsagreatreluct
Normallyastudentmustattendacertainnumberofcoursesinordertograduate,andeachcoursewhichheattendsgivesacredit
Theyear2000willbringbigchangesincommunication.Cellphoneswillbesmallenoughtocarryinyourpocket.Videophoneswil
Canadaisthesecondlargestcountryintheworldinarea,althoughits【1】isonlysome25million,most【2】ina200-milestrip【3】
UncleSamisatall,thinman.He’sanoldermanwithwhitehairandawhitebeard.Heoftenwearsatallhat,abowtie,andth
Ineed______cloth,forI’mgoingtomake______clothes.
随机试题
简述公证机构受理公证申请盼条件。
求幂级数的收敛域(考虑区间端点)
下列关于票据行为特征的表述中,错误的是()。
劳动争议调解委员会由职工代表、用人单位代表和企业工会代表组成,劳动争议调解委员会主任由()担任。
美味鸭舌,一种风味小吃,真空包装,每包15克
根据图形资料,回答问题:下列关于2007年我国城乡居民各种生活领域安全感得分的说法不正确的是()。
文件系统的主要目的是______。
请在【答题】菜单下选择【进入考生文件夹】命令,并按照题目要求完成下面的操作。注意:以下的文件必须都保存在考生文件夹下。文档“北京政府统计工作年报.docx”是一篇从互联网上获取的文字资料,请打开该文档并按下列要求进行排版及保存操作:将除封面页外的所
Inthesecondhalfofeachyear,manypowerfulstormsareborninthetropicalAtlanticandCaribbeanseas.Of【1】,onlyaboutha
Thebattleisofgreatsignificancewhenviewedinthe______oftheprogressofthewar.
最新回复
(
0
)