首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2014-01-07
32
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence(过失)cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned, that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals.
What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the US.
B、History of the US railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
本文主要介绍的是美国法院在铁路公司伤害案中的裁决,因此D是最佳答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/ghmMFFFM
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Youshouldn’t______yourfather’sinstructions.Anywayheisanexperiencedteacher.
WhichofthefollowingisNOTthereasonthatthemanwantstogoonadiet?
Whatinformationdoesthewomanneedtodothecheck-infortheman?
FormerU.S.presidentJimmyCarteronSundaycondemnedaunilateralU.S.attackonIraq
Inmyneighborhoodintheearly1980s,wespentthesummerplayingkickball.Ourfrontlawnswereaconstant.Wetooktheirsoft
Inmyneighborhoodintheearly1980s,wespentthesummerplayingkickball.Ourfrontlawnswereaconstant.Wetooktheirsoft
Thecoupletoldthedecoratorthattheywantedtheirbedroomgailypainted.Theunderlinedpartmeans______.
Weallhaveoffensivebreathatonetimeoranother.Inmosteasesoffensivebreathemanatesfrombacteriainthemouth,althoug
Whenonespouseisdepressed,amarriageisdepressed.Thisillnesserodesemotionalandsexualintimacyandmakesarelationshi
RuthHandlerinventedsomethingin1959whichbecamesoquintessentiallyAmericanastobeincludedintheofficial"America’s
随机试题
措施项目费的计算方法中,具有简单明了,公式的科学性、准确性难以把握等特点的方法是()。
范德华方程对理想气体方程做了哪两项修正?()
简述生产与作业系统面临的问题。
再休似此处栖迟。栖迟:
A.至宝丹B.紫雪丹C.苏合香丸D.紫金锭患者脘腹胀闷疼痛,呕吐泄泻。治宜选用
患儿,女,3岁。面色萎黄,形体消瘦,神疲肢倦,不思乳食,腹满喜按,大便稀溏腥臭,舌质淡,苔白腻,脉濡滑。治法宜
工程监理单位的安全责任不含有()。
下列非金属材料中,可用作绝热材料的有()。
下列法律行为成立的是( )。
以下叙述中正确的是
最新回复
(
0
)