首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warning against generalizing. Each country is different, they say, and no one st
Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warning against generalizing. Each country is different, they say, and no one st
admin
2014-06-02
48
问题
Pundits who want to sound judicious are fond of warning against generalizing. Each country is different, they say, and no one story fits all of Asia. This is, of course, silly., all of these economies plunged into economic crisis within a few months of each other, so they must have had something in common.
In fact, the logic of catastrophe was pretty much the same in Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and South Korea. (Japan is a very different story. ) In each case investor— mainly, but not entirely, foreign banks who had made short-term loans—all tried to pull their money out at the same time. The result was a combined banking and currency crisis, a banking crisis because no bank can convert all its assets into cash on short notice; a currency crisis because panicked investors were trying not only to convert long-term assets into cash, but to convert baht or rupiah into dollars. In the face of the stampede, governments had no good options. If they let their currencies plunge inflation would soar and companies that had borrowed in dollars would go bankrupts if they tried to support their currencies by pushing up interest rates, the same firms would probably go bust from the combination of debt burden and recession. In practice, countries split the difference—and paid a heavy price regardless.
Was the crisis a punishment for bad economic management? Like most cliches, the catchphrase "crony capitalism" has prospered because it gets at something real: excessively cozy relationships between government and business really did lead to a lot of bad investments. The still primitive financial structure of Asian business also made the economies peculiarly vulnerable to a loss of confidence. But the punishment was surely disproportionate to the crime, and many investments that look foolish in retrospect seemed sensible at the time.
Given that there were no good policy options, was the policy response mainly on the right track? There was frantic blame-shifting when everything in Asia seemed to be going wrong: now there is a race to claim credit when some things have started to go right. The international Monetary Fund points to Korea’s recovery—and more generally to the fact that the sky didn’t fall after all—as proof that its policy recommendations were right. Never mind that other IMF clients have done far worse, and that the economy of Malaysia—which refused IMF help, and horrified respectable opinion by imposing capital controls—also seems to be on the mend. MalaYsia’s prime Minister, by contrast, claims full credit for any good news—even though neighbouring economies also seem to have bottomed out.
The truth is that an observer without any ax to grind would probably conclude that none of the policies adopted either on or in defiance of the IMF’s advice made much difference either way. Budget policies, interest rate policies, banking reform—whatever countries tried, just about ali the capital that could flee, did. And when there was no mere money to run, the natural recuperative powers of the economies finally began to prevail. At best, the money doctors who purported to offer cures provided a helpful bedside manner; at worst, they were like medieval physicians who prescribed bleeding as a remedy for all ills.
Will the patients stage a full recovery? It depends on exactly what you mean by "full". South Korea’s industrial production is already above its pre-crisis level; but in the spring of 1997 anyone who had predicted zero growth in Korea’s industry over the next two years would have been regarded as a reckless doomsayer. So if by recovery you mean not just a return to growth, but one that brings the region’s performance back to something like what people used to regard as the Asian norm, they have a long way to go.
At the end of the passage, the writer seems to think that a full recovery of the Asian economy is______.
选项
A、due
B、remote
C、imaginative
D、unpredictable
答案
B
解析
本题为推理题。短文最后一段的最后一句说...they have along way to go.即这些国家(的经济全面复苏)有很长的路要走。故选项B(遥远的)为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/SW0YFFFM
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
WhichofthefollowingisNOTthecrimecommittedbythemen?
IntroductiontotheSportsStudiesDepartmentThismini-lecturegivenbytheSportsStudiesDepartmentontheUniversity’sOpen
Theyearwhichprecededmyfather’sdeathmadegreatchangeinmylife.IhadbeenlivinginNewJersey,workingdefenseplants,
Scientistsclaimthatairpollutioncausesadeclineintheworld’saverageairtemperature.Inordertoprovethattheory,eco
AgricultureinBritainI.Britishagricultureanditssupportingareas:accountforaround(1)______ofGNP.II.Smallpercentage
SuggestionsforEffectiveResearch-BasedAssignmentsI.Thefunctionofawell-designedassignment—Itteachesstudentsvaluable
DisappearingActTherehavebeenrumors.There’sbeengossip.AllHollywoodisshockedtolearnthatCalistaFlockhart,star
A、professionaltrainingB、personalityC、lifeexperienceD、appearanceB
Thepublicationof______markedthebeginningofRomanticAge.
随机试题
胆为六腑之一,又称奇恒之腑,是由于
进行生物碱沉淀反应的介质是
甲公司对一行政机关发给乙公司的许可证不服,向法院提起行政诉讼,法院受理后发现行政机关发给乙公司的许可证虽违反决定时的法律,但符合新的法律。下列说法正确的有:()
某公路工程施工项目,建设单位通过施工监理招标和施工招标,分别于2010年4月10日及2010年4月25日与某监理单位和某施工单位签订了施工监理合同和施工合同。在施工过程中发生了以下事件:事件1:路基工程施工时,施工单位无法在工程现场附近找到满足技术
企业职工伤亡事故统计实行以()为主的制度。
证券投资基金能够通过有效的资产组合最大限度地()。
留存收益包括盈余公积和资本公积。()
游泳池有甲、乙、丙三个注水管,如果单开甲管需要20小时注满水池;甲、乙两管合开需要8小时注满水池;乙、丙两管合开需要6小时注满水池、那么,单开丙管需要多少小时注满水池?()
高山上敲鼓:四面闻名
教唆犯可以是()。
最新回复
(
0
)