首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
On April 8th Envisat, Europe’s largest Earth-observing satellite, unexpectedly stopped talking to its users on the Earth below.
On April 8th Envisat, Europe’s largest Earth-observing satellite, unexpectedly stopped talking to its users on the Earth below.
admin
2011-02-03
38
问题
On April 8th Envisat, Europe’s largest Earth-observing satellite, unexpectedly stopped talking to its users on the Earth below. Since then those users have been frantically trying to re-establish contact. They rely on Envisat’s radars and other sensors for a wide range of measurements, from the temperature of the oceans to the chemistry of the stratosphere. Scientists have used it to gauge ocean conditions for shipping and to investigate earthquakes; its data have been the basis of thousands of scientific papers.
Envisat had, unlike much of Europe, forgone early retirement: designed for five years of operation, it was on its tenth. Given its advanced years, you would think that planning for its eventual end would be well in hand. You would expect that successor instruments would already be in orbit, their measurements carefully cross-correlated with Envisat’s so that the elucidation of the scope and pace of global environmental change could continue seamlessly. You would be wrong.
Wilful blindness
Providing earthlings with a reliable, continuous record of their planet’s condition would seem a sensible aim in any circumstances. With the state of the atmosphere and oceans upset in ways whose consequences are not easily foreseen, and may well prove catastrophic, it becomes an imperative. You do not need to know every little thing about the environment in order to make policy about it. But only long-term measurements will allow researchers to get a reliable grip on the science of climate change and other environmental stresses. A firm grasp of the basic trends is a necessary precondition for understanding and for informed policy.
The governments that build and operate satellites like Envisat are not taking that necessity seriously. According to a damning report from America’s National Academies, the number of civilian Earth-observing satellites flown by the United States government looks likely to fall from 23 today to just 6 in 2020, and the number of instruments in orbit could drop from 90 to 20. The situation in Europe is somewhat less disastrous, but has its own problems. The European Space Agency is unwilling to move forward with a new generation of satellites that can monitor the environment continuously until the European Union promises to pay their operating costs.
Several of the parties involved must share the blame for this failure. The scientists who have a say in setting the priorities for Earth observation often fixate on pet projects and new sorts of measurement, as scientists are not to do; that can lead to the vital business of long-term monitoring getting downplayed. Co-operation and co-ordination between agencies and countries is not what it should be. Then there is bad luck (or poor judgment): in recent years the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) lost two Earth-observing missions in a row because of a second-rate rocket for which it has yet to find an adequate replacement.
But the main culprits are governments, which are spending too little on the job. In 2010 the World Meteorological Organisation estimated that getting satellite observations up to scratch in terms of climate monitoring would cost an extra $1 billion a year. In the late 1990s NASA used to spend $2 billion a year on Earth observations, but by 2007 that had fallen to $1.3 billion (the costs of a successor to the Hubble Space Telescope rose from around $2 billion to $9 billion over roughly the same period). Properly co-ordinated, modest increases in the budget in America and the EU, and contributions from other powers (China is now flying very capable Earth-observing satellites; India and Brazil have been in the game for a while), could sort the problem out. Without them, the world will feel its way into the future blind and ill-prepared.
From The Economist, May 12, 2012
What happened to the satellite?
选项
A、It stopped communicating with Earth.
B、It collided with rocks in space.
C、It lost electric power.
D、It fell out of the earth’s orbit.
答案
A
解析
本题为细节题。第一段“unexpectedly stopped talking to its users on the Earth below.Since then those users have been frantically trying to re—establish contact.”一句可以推断正确答案为A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/noqMFFFM
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
MarilynwillnotbeabletocometotheChristmaspartyassheis_____withacold.
Whateverhisformerconduct______,hiscircumstanceshouldexempthimfromrebukenow..
Whenyouchooseafreezer,rememberit’sprobablygoingtobewithyouforalongtime.Nosinglestyleorsizeisbest,soit’s
Whatisthetalkmainlyabout?
Run,Rabbits,RunFromGreenwichtotheMallisgoodsportforallInits13years,theLondonMarathonhasacquiredapedi
AccordingtotheresearchbyNASA,anafternoonnap______.
AccordingtotheresearchbyNASA,anafternoonnap______.
Ascientistwhodoesresearchineconomicpsychologyandwhowantstopredictthewayinwhichconsumerswillspendtheirmoney
Homeowners:areyouawarethatthere’sanall-newelectronicinventioncalled"thebug"?Itissensitivetothesoundsofaburg
TheNationalTrustinBritain,togetherwithsimilarvoluntaryorganizations,playsanincreasinglyimportantpartinthepreser
随机试题
抗日战争时期,中国共产党开展延安整风运动最主要的任务是()
关于水利水电工程施工分包,下列说法中正确的是()。
混凝土拌合物的和易性通常包括()。
甲公司委托开户银行收款时,发现其持有的由乙公司签发金额为10万元的转账支票为空头支票。根据《支付结算办法》的规定,甲公司有权要求乙公司支付赔偿金的数额是( )。
个人独资企业解散的,财产清偿的内容包括()。
在资本化期间内,下列有关借款费用会计处理的表述中,正确的有()。
A公司是一家上市公司,该公司2014年和2015年的主要财务数据以及2016年的财务计划数据如下表所示:假设公司产品的市场前景很好,销售额可以大幅增加,贷款银行要求公司的资产负债率不得超过60%。董事会决议规定,以权益净利率高低作为管理层业绩评价的尺度
在下列旅游动机中属于地位和声望动机的有()。
根据布朗芬布伦纳(U.Bronfenbrenner)的生态系统理论,学校和家庭对孩子教育的一致性程度属于()
ships16世纪时第一个码头被建成,并在这里制造船只,使得伦敦东区(EastEnd)成了大的国际贸易中心(thefocusofmassiveinternationaltrade)。录音中的thedockWasdug对应题目中的const
最新回复
(
0
)