首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even creat
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even creat
admin
2012-12-01
44
问题
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even create the next Google. Better yet, this plan won’t cost the government a dime. In fact, it will save a lot of money. But few politicians are going to want to touch it. Here’s the plan: More immigration. A pathway to legal status for undocumented immigrants. And a. recognition that immigration policy is economic policy, and needs to be thought of as such.
See what I meant about politicians not liking it?
Economists will tell you that immigrants raise wages for the average native-born worker. They’ll tell you that they make things cheaper for us to buy here, and that if we didn’t have immigrants for some of these jobs, the jobs would move to other countries. They’ll tell you that we should allow for much more highly skilled immigration, because that’s about as close to a free lunch as you’re likely to find. They’ll tell you that the people who should most want a path to legal status for undocumented immigrants are the low-income workers who are most opposed to such plans. And about all this, the economists are right.
There are also noneconomic considerations, of course. Integrating cultures and nationalities is difficult. Undocumented immigrants raise issues of law and fairness. Border security is important. Those questions are important. They’re just not the subject of this column.
The mistake we make when thinking about the effect immigrants have on our wages, says Giovanni Peri, an economist at the University of California at Davis who has studied the issue extensively, is we imagine an economy where the number of jobs is fixed. Then, if one immigrant comes in, he takes one of those jobs or forces a worker to accept a lower wage. But that’s not how our economy works. With more labor—particularly more labor of different kinds—the economy grows larger. It produces more stuff. There are more workers buying things and that increases the total number of jobs. We understand perfectly well that Europe is in trouble because its low birth rates mean fewer workers and that means less economic growth. We ourselves worry that we’re not graduating enough scientists and engineers. But the economy doesn’t care if it gets workers through birth rates or green cards.
In fact, there’s a sense in which green cards are superior. Economists separate new workers into two categories: Those who "substitute" for existing labor—we’re both construction workers, and the boss can easily swap you out for me; and those who "complement" existing labor—you’re a construction engineer and I’m a construction worker. Immigrants, more so than U. S. -born workers, tend to be in the second category, as the jobs you want to give to someone who doesn’t speak English very well and doesn’t have many skills are different from the jobs you give to people who are fluent and have more skills.
But that’s only half of their benefit. "Living standards are a function of two things," says Michael Greenstone, director of the Hamilton Project, which is hosting a Washington conference on the economics of immigration next week. "They’re a function of our wages and the prices of the goods we purchase. " And immigrants reduce the prices of those goods. Patricia Cortes, an economist at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business, found that immigrants lowered the prices in "immigrant-intensive industries" like housekeeping and gardening by about 10 percent. So our wages go up and the prices of the things we want to buy go down.
We should remember, though, that the average worker isn’t every worker. A study by Harvard economists George Borjas and Lawrence Katz found that although immigrants raised nitive wages overall, they slightly hurt the 8 percent of workers without a high-school education and those with a college education. A subsequent study by Peri looked harder at the ways immigrant labor differed from native labor and found that all groups of workers saw a benefit from immigrants—though unskilled workers saw less of a benefit than highly skilled workers.
And unskilled workers face even tougher competition from undocumented immigrants who, because their status is so tenuous, will accept pay beneath the minimum wage. And they are unlikely to complain about safety regulations or work conditions. That takes unskilled immigrants from being a bit cheaper than unskilled natives and makes them a lot cheaper—which makes employers likelier to hire them for jobs that native workers could do better.
This suggests, first, that American workers would be better off if we figured out a way to take the 12 million undocumented immigrants and give them legal status, and second, that we might want to give them more direct help if we’re going to increase immigration. Both are possible—just politically difficult.
Our immigration policy should be primarily oriented around our national goals. And one goal is to have the world’s most innovative and dynamic economy. It’s never going to be the case that each and every one of the planet’s most talented individuals is born on American soil. But those born elsewhere could be lured here. People like living here. We should be leveraging that advantage, mercilessly roaming the globe, finding the most talented people and attracting them to our country. When we have the best talent, we have the best innovations. That’s how we landed Google, Intel, and the atomic bomb. Immigrants are about twice as likely as native-born Americans to start a small business, and they’re 30 percent more likely to apply for a patent.
Who will suffer most from immigration?
选项
A、Immigrants.
B、Average Americans.
C、Unskilled American workers.
D、Highly skilled American workers.
答案
C
解析
原文主要探讨了移民将使本国普通工人受益。第八段中提到“无技能的工人受益不如有技能的工人大。”因此,受益最小的也就是蒙受损失最大的,应该是无技能的工人。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/lgUYFFFM
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
SiliconValleyisamagnettowhichnumeroustalentedengineers,scientistsandentrepreneursfromoverseasflockinsearchoff
DavidLandes,authorofTheWealthandPovertyofNations:WhySomeAreSoRichandSomeSoPoor,creditstheworld’seconomics
WhichofthefollowingisNOTwrittenbyWilliamButlerYeats?
TheodoreDreiserandJackLondonareamongthebestrepresentativewritersofliterary______,whichisgreatlyinfluencedbyDa
Threeweeksago,astorywepublishedputusinthemiddleofacontroversy.Itwashardlythefirsttimethathashappened,but
ParadiseLostandParadiseRegainedwerewrittenby______.
"Ido."ToAmericansthosetwowordscarrygreatmeaning.Theycanevenchangeyourlife.Especiallyifyousaythematyourown
Understandingtheculturalhabitsofanothernation,especiallyonecontainingsomanydiversifiedsubculturesastheUS,area
历史的道路,不是平坦的,有时走到艰难的境界。这是全靠雄伟的精神才能够冲过去的。一条浩浩荡荡的长江大河,有时候到很宽阔的境界,平原无际,一泻万里。有时候流到很逼狭的境界,两岸从山迭岭,绝壁断崖,江河流于期间,回环曲折,及其险峻。民族生命的进展,其经
随机试题
背景某商业大厦建设工程项目,建设单位通过招标选定某施工单位承担该建设工程项目的施工任务。该工程外墙全部为相同设计、相同材料、相同工艺和施工条件的隐框玻璃幕墙,工程东、西、北三个立面造型均比较规则,面积分别为487m2、645m2、2218m2,南侧立面
这些瀑布不为人所知,这________因为人们对它们不感兴趣或者它们不够迷人,________由于它们处于边远险要之地,游客要想一睹它们的风采就显得困难重重了。填入画横线部分最恰当的一项是()。
纯铜焊接过程产生的气孔是()气孔。
某种管制理论把监管看成是政府用来改善资源配置和收入分配的手段,该管制理论是( )。
信息加工理论对实际教学的启示是()
社区居民自治的方式不包括()。
某公司研发了一种空调管理系统,通过对人流量的检测自动启动、关闭空调,这个系统的应用。将使得办公场所的空调用电量大大节省。但这个系统推出几年来,购买的并不多,销售不理想。以下最能够合理解释上述现象的是()。
TheXinhuabookstorechain,China’slargestofficialpublishingenterprise,hasbecomeasurprisingflashpointforinterestamo
(1)在考生文件夹中有工程文件sj3.vbp及窗体文件sj3.frm。在名为Forml的窗体上有3个Label控件和两个命令按钮,Label控件均为提示信息。命令按钮名称分别为Cmdl和Cmd2,标题分别为“Quit”和“Begin”。程序运行后,单击“B
Whytheinductiveandmathematicalsciences,aftertheirfirstrapiddevelopmentattheculminationofGreekcivilization,advan
最新回复
(
0
)