首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Can Burglars Jam Your Wireless Security System? A)Any product that promises to protect your home deserves careful examination. S
Can Burglars Jam Your Wireless Security System? A)Any product that promises to protect your home deserves careful examination. S
admin
2019-03-15
35
问题
Can Burglars Jam Your Wireless Security System?
A)Any product that promises to protect your home deserves careful examination. So it isn’t surprising that you’ll find plenty of strong opinions about the potential vulnerabilities of popular home-security systems.
B)The most likely type of burglary(入室盗窃)by far is the unsophisticated crime of opportunity, usually involving a broken window or some forced entry. According to the FBI, crimes like these accounted for roughly two-thirds of all household burglaries in the US in 2013. The wide majority of the rest were illegal, unforced entries that resulted from something like a window being left open. The odds of a criminal using technical means to bypass a security system are so small that the FBI doesn’t even track those statistics.
C)One of the main theoretical home-security concerns is whether or not a given system is vulnerable to being blocked from working altogether. With wired setups, the fear is that a burglar(入室盗贼)might be able to shut your system down simply by cutting the right cable. With a wireless setup, you stick battery-powered sensors up around your home that keep an eye on windows, doors, motion, and more. If they detect something wrong while the system is armed, they’ll transmit a wireless alert signal to a base station that will then raise the alarm. That approach will eliminate most cord-cutting concerns—but what about their wireless equivalent, jamming? With the right device tuned to the right frequency, what’s to stop a thief from jamming your setup and blocking that alert signal from ever reaching the base station?
D)Jamming concerns are nothing new, and they’re not unique to security systems. Any device that’s built to receive a wireless signal at a specific frequency can be overwhelmed by a stronger signal coming in on the same frequency. For comparison, let’s say you wanted to "jam" a conversation between two people—all you’d need to do is yell in the listener’s ear.
E)Security devices are required to list the frequencies they broadcast on—that means that a potential thief can find what they need to know with minimal Googling. They will, however, need to know what system they’re looking for. If you have a sign in your yard declaring what setup you use, that’d point them in the right direction, though at that point, we’re talking about a highly targeted, semi-sophisticated attack, and not the sort of forced-entry attack that makes up the majority of burglaries. It’s easier to find and acquire jamming equipment for some frequencies than it is for others.
F)Wireless security providers will often take steps to help combat the threat of jamming attacks. SimpliSafe, winner of our Editors’ Choice distinction, utilizes a special system that’s capable of separating incidental RF interference from targeted jamming attacks. When the system thinks it’s being jammed, it’ll notify you via push alert(推送警报). From there, it’s up to you to sound the alarm manually.
G)SimpliSafe was singled out in one recent article on jamming, complete with a video showing the entire system being effectively bypassed with handheld jamming equipment. After taking appropriate measures to contain the RF interference to our test lab, we tested the attack out for ourselves, and were able to verify that it’s possible with the right equipment. However, we also verified that SimpliSafe’s anti-jamming system works. It caught us in the act, sent an alert to my smartphone, and also listed our RF interference on the system’s event log. The team behind the article and video in question make no mention of the system, or whether or not it detected them.
H)We like the unique nature of that software. It means that a thief likely wouldn’t be able to Google how the system works, then figure out a way around it. Even if they could, SimpliSafe claims that its system is always evolving, and that it varies slightly from system to system, which means there wouldn’t be a universal magic formula for cracking it. Other systems also seem confident on the subject of jamming. The team at Frontpoint addresses the issue in a blog on its site, citing their own jam protection software and claiming that there aren’t any documented cases of a successful jam attack since the company began offering wireless security sensors in the 1980s.
I)Jamming attacks are absolutely possible. As said before, with the right equipment and the right know-how, it’s possible to jam any wireless transmission. But how probable is it that someone will successfully jam their way into your home and steal your stuff?
J)Let’s imagine that you live in a small home with a wireless security setup that offers a functional antijamming system. First, a thief is going to need to target your home, specifically. Then, he’s going to need to know the technical details of your system and acquire the specific equipment necessary for jamming your specific setup. Presumably, you keep your doors locked at night and while you’re away, so the thief will still need to break in. That means defeating the lock somehow, or breaking a window. He’ll need to be jamming you at this point, as a broken window or opened door would normally release the alarm. So, too, would the motion detectors in your home, so the thief will need to continue jamming once he’s inside and searching for things to steal. However, he’ll need to do so without tripping the anti-jamming system, the details of which he almost certainly does not have access to.
K)At the end of the day, these kinds of systems are primarily designed to protect against the sort of opportunistic smash-and-grab attack that makes up the majority of burglaries. They’re also only a single layer in what should ideally be a many-sided approach to securing your home, one that includes common sense things like sound locks and proper exterior lighting at night. No system is impenetrable, and none can promise to eliminate the worst case completely. Every one of them has vulnerabilities that a knowledgeable thief could theoretically exploit. A good system is one that keeps that worst-case setting as improbable as possible while also offering strong protection in the event of a less-extraordinary attack.
SimpliSafe’s device can send a warning to the house owner’s cellphone.
选项
答案
G
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/Ye7FFFFM
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
A、Upgradeitsnetworkcapacity.B、Improvecustomerservices.C、Developnewproducts.D、MarketmoreiPhones.A信息明示题。由AT&Tplanst
A、TocontrolKidalairport.B、Toprotectthetown.C、ToprotectthecapitalBamako.D、TofightagainstIslamistmilitants.B细节推断
A、Economicgrowth.B、Reducingunemployment.C、Socialsecurity.D、Howtopaygrowingnumbersofpensioners.C信息明示题。短文中提到GeorgeW.
7月底,中国环境保护部(China’sEnvironmentProtectionMinistry)发布了今年上半年空气质量状况报告。报告称,除了拉萨(Lhasa)、海口、舟山和惠州四个城市,我国其他主要大城市的空气质量均未达标。造成这一结果的原因有很
A、Theyrequestedtotransfertoasaferdepartment.B、Theyquitworktoprotecttheirunbornbabies.C、Theysoughthelpfromuni
A、Itsprotectionisoftenneglectedbychildren.B、Itcannotbefullyrestoredoncedamaged.C、Therearemanyfalsenotionsabou
A、Cooking.B、Cleaning.C、Skincare.D、Painting.C短文第2句开始谈植物油的用处,提到了cooking,paint和cleaningproducts,只有C项未提及,因而它就是答案。
A、Peoplewhoeatspoiledfoodmaygetsick.B、Farmershavetothrowawayspoiledproducts.C、Farmershavetosellthespoiledpr
随机试题
A.早期胃癌B.小胃癌C.微小胃癌D.进展期胃癌E.晚期胃癌癌灶直径≤5mm的胃癌属于
浅龋与轻度釉质发育不全的鉴别要点,不包括
男性,64岁,吞咽困难3个月。30年前因“胃溃疡穿孔”曾行“胃大部切除术”。入院上消化道造影提示;食管中段长4cm狭窄,胃呈术后改变(毕I式)。最佳的代食管器官是
下列哪种建筑突出物允许突人道路红线?[2000年第3题][2006年第51题]
企业发行股票筹资的特点包括( )。
当社会总供给大于总需求时,政府可实施的财政政策措施有()。Ⅰ.增加财政补贴支出Ⅱ.实行中性预算平衡政策Ⅲ.缩小预算支出规模Ⅳ.降低税率
以下符合《银行从业人员职业操守》的制定目的的是()。
用于评价企业盈利能力的总资产报酬率指标中的“报酬”是指( )。
某企业只生产A产品,本月实际产量是500件,发生固定制造费用1800元,实际工时900小时;企业生产能力为800件即2400小时;每件产品固定制造费用标准成本为9元。则下列说法中正确的有()。
内部语言(北京大学)
最新回复
(
0
)