首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
To govern is to choose how the revenue raised from taxes is spent. So far so good, or bad. But some people earn more money than
To govern is to choose how the revenue raised from taxes is spent. So far so good, or bad. But some people earn more money than
admin
2019-08-27
17
问题
To govern is to choose how the revenue raised from taxes is spent. So far so good, or bad. But some people earn more money than others. Should they pay proportionately more money to the government than those who earn less? And if they do pay more money are they entitled to more services than those who pay less or those who pay nothing at all? And should those who pay nothing at all because they have nothing get anything? These matters are of irritable concern to our rulers, and of some poignancy to the rest.
Although the equality of each citizen before the law is the rock upon which the American Constitution rests, economic equality has never been an American ideal. In fact, it is the one unmentionable subject in our politics, as the senator from South Dakota recently discovered when he came up with a few quasi-egalitarian tax reforms. The furious and enduring terror of Communism in America is not entirely the work of those early cold warriors Truman and Acheson. A dislike of economic equality is something deep-grained in the American Protestant character. After all, given a rich empty continent for vigorous Europeans to exploit (the Indians were simply a disagreeable part of the emptiness, like chiggers), any man of gumption could make himself a good living. With extra hard work, any man could make himself a fortune, proving that he was a better man than the rest. Long before Darwin the American ethos was Darwinian.
The vision of the rich empty continent is still a part of the American unconscious in spite of the Great Crowding and its attendant miseries; and this lingering belief in the heaven any man can make for himself through hard work and clean living is a key to the majority’s prevailing and apparently unalterable hatred of the poor, kept out of sight at home, out of mind abroad.
Yet there has been, from the beginning, a significant division in our ruling class. The early Thomas Jefferson had a dream: a society of honest yeomen, engaged in agricultural pursuits, without large cities, heavy industry, banks, military pretensions. The early (and the late) Alexander Hamilton wanted industry, banks, cities, and a military force capable of making itself felt in world politics. It is a nice irony that so many of today’s laissez-faire conservatives think that they descend from Hamilton, the proponent of a strong federal government, and that so many liberals believe themselves to be the heirs of the early Jefferson, who wanted little more than a police force and a judiciary. Always practical, Jefferson knew that certain men would rise through their own good efforts while, sadly, others would fall. Government would do no more than observe this Darwinian spectacle benignly, and provide no succor.
In 1800 the Hamiltonian view was rejected by the people and their new President Thomas Jefferson. Four years later, the Hamiltonian view had prevailed and was endorsed by the reelected Jefferson. Between 1800 and 1805 Jefferson had seen to it that an empire in posse had become an empire in esse. The difference between Jefferson I and Jefferson II is reflected in the two inaugural addresses.
It is significant that nothing more elevated than greed changed the Dr. Jekyll of Jefferson I into the Mr. Hyde of Jefferson II. Like his less thoughtful countrymen, Jefferson could not resist a deal. Subverting the Constitution he had helped create, Jefferson bought Louisiana from Napoleon, acquiring its citizens without their consents. The author of The Declaration of Independence was quite able to forget the unalienable rights of anyone whose property he thought should be joined to our empire — a word which crops up frequently and unselfconsciously in his correspondence.
In the course of land-grabbing, Jefferson II managed to get himself into hot water with France, England, and Spain simultaneously, a fairly astonishing thing to do considering the state of politics in Napoleonic Europe.
The author holds that Jefferson’s purchase of the Louisiana territories______.
选项
A、may be seen as a hypocritical act
B、rigorously held with his previous views of inalienable rights
C、cannot be seen as an act of empire-expansion
D、was an act meant to lower taxes and improve the wealth of the nation
答案
A
解析
根据倒数第二段中的“Subverting the Constitution he had helped create,Jefferson bought Louisiana from Napoleon...The author of The Declaration of Independence was quite able to forget the unalienable rights of anyone”可知,杰斐逊推翻了他帮助制定的宪法,从拿破仑那里买下了路易斯安那州,完全忘记了公民不可剥夺的权利。据此可知,A项“被看作是一种伪善的行为”正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/W7NYFFFM
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Hippiesweremembersofayouthmovementofthe1960’sand1970’sthatstartedintheUnitedStatesandspreadtoCanada,Great
OurculturehascausedmostAmericanstoassumenotonlythatourlanguageisuniversalbutthatthegesturesweuseareunderst
Graphenemustsurelybeoneofthemostexcitingdevelopmentsinmodernscience.Indeed,thesubstanceissoextraordinarythat
Ishallmentiontwoorthreemattersinwhichtheneedforcooperationbetweenphilosophyandscienceisespeciallyintimate.【T
Inmanyplaces,illnesswasseeneitherasaninvasionofthebodybysomepoisonoritwas______totheworkofanangrygod,ma
Asabusinessmodel,theworldofpublishinghasalwaysbeenasomewhatsleepyenclave,butnowallthatseemspoisedtochange.
Woodyarrivedatamost______moment;Iwasjustgettingintothebath.
AcenturyagointheUnitedStates,whenanindividualbroughtsuitagainstacompany,publicopiniontendedtoprotectthatcom
Shehadto______herdressbecauseshehadlostweight.
尽管美国的制造业就业岗位长期流失,但由于在飞机和高科技设备等高价值的研发和生产等方面能力卓越,美国的制造业方面仍处于世界领先地位。与此同时,中国的主要产品还是低成本的服装和消费类电子产品。在产品价值方面美国的产品占世界制造业总产值的20%以上,大约是中国的
随机试题
完成反应式
A.短暂性脑缺血发作B.脑出血C.蛛网膜下腔出血D.脑血栓形成E.脑栓塞多在安静休息或睡眠时发病
普通混凝土小型空心砌块中主砌块的基本规格是下列哪组数值(mm)?[2006—005]
下列采用了空间薄壳结构的公共建筑是:
单层建筑物内设局部3层楼用于办公,其中第二层没有围护结构的,()。
五笔字型输入法属于()。
2008年金融危机后,巴塞尔委员会有效银行监管核心原则的主要变化趋势包括()。
根据个人所得税法律制度的规定,下列关于个人所得来源地的判断中,正确的有()。(2010年)
追求实现完全人格的教育,反对教育的过早专门化和过分职业化,这体现了()。
从所给的四个选项中,选择最合适的一个填入问号处,使之呈现一定的规律性:
最新回复
(
0
)