首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
What if the government simply paid everyone enough so that no one was poor? That’s the so called "universal basic income" or UBI
What if the government simply paid everyone enough so that no one was poor? That’s the so called "universal basic income" or UBI
admin
2021-08-06
27
问题
What if the government simply paid everyone enough so that no one was poor? That’s the so called "universal basic income" or UBI. It’s an insane idea that’s gaining an unlikely alliance of supporters. The follow excerpt provides details of this idea.
Write an article of NO LESS THAN 300 words, in which you should:
1. summarize the basic idea of UBI and its justification, and then
2. express your opinion towards it, especially whether it is practical in the near future.
A Universal Basic Income Is the Solution to Poverty
There’s a simple way to end poverty: the government just gives everyone enough money, so nobody is poor. No ifs, buts, conditions, or tests. Everyone gets the minimum they need to survive, even if they already have plenty.
This, in essence, is "universal basic income " or "guaranteed basic income"—where, instead of multiple income assistance programs, we have just one: a single payment to all citizens, regardless of background, gender, or race. It’s a policy idea that sounds crazy at first, but actually begins to make sense when you consider some recent trends.
The first is that work isn’t what it used to be. Many people now struggle through a 50-hour week and still don’t have enough to live on. There are many reasons for this—including the heartlessness of employers and the weakness of unions—but it’s a fact. Work no longer pays. The wages of most American workers have stagnated or declined since the 1970s.
The second: it’s likely to get worse. Robots already do many menial tasks. In the future, they’ll do more sophisticated jobs as well. A study from Oxford University found that 47% of jobs are at risk of computerization over the next two decades. We’re approaching an era when there will simply be less to do.
The third is that traditional welfare is both not what it used to be and not very efficient. The value of welfare for families with children is now well below what it was in the 1990s, for example.
For these reasons and others, the idea of a basic income for everyone is becoming increasingly popular. The exact details of basic income still need to be worked out, but it might work something like this: Instead of welfare payments, subsidies for health care, and tax credits for the working poor, we would take that money and use it to cover a single payment that would give someone the chance to live reasonably.
A pilot in the 1970s in Manitoba, Canada, showed that a "Mincome" not only ended poverty but also reduced hospital visits and raised high-school completion rates. There seemed to be a community-affirming effect, which showed itself in people making use of free public services more responsibly.
Meanwhile, there were eight "negative income tax" trials in the U.S. in the ’70s, where people received payments and the government clawed back most of it in taxes based on your other income. The results for those trials were more mixed. They reduced poverty, but people also worked slightly less than normal. To some, this is the major drawback of basic income: it could make people lazier than they would otherwise be. That would certainly be a problem, though it’s questionable whether, in the future, there will be as much employment anyway. The age of robots and artificial intelligence seems likely to hollow out many jobs, perhaps changing how we view notions of laziness and productivity altogether.
选项
答案
Universal Basic Income Is Unrealistic As our society further progresses in creating wealth, the issue of poverty becomes more prominent and the elimination of it is more urgent. In order to end poverty, the idea of universal basic income is put forward which proposes that everyone gets the minimum they need to live regardless of what he or she already has, with considerations of the decline of salary, the computerization of work and the inefficiency of traditional welfare system. Despite the fact that policy derived from this idea has achieved quite promising results in pilot towns in Canada and America, I still believe that universal basic income is unrealistic. It is bound to fail if universally applied. First and obviously, the idea of universal basic income breaks the conventional balance between work and pay. If people reap without sowing, then there would be such individuals who would rather stroll around than work or do anything substantial for the good of society. The reason is as plain as day. Working or not, all people can anyway receive the minimal income sufficient to support their living. As a result, laziness will spread like virus among people who see through the "benefit" of not working. Another argument in favor of my view is that once idleness is regarded as a comfortable way of living, then the production of the whole society will without doubt slow down. I do not deny the computerization of much work, yet neither do I deny that robots and computers have to be controlled and operated by men. Therefore, laziness among the general public will, in one way or another, decrease the overall productivity of the world. And we should bear in mind that without sustainable sources of income it is a mission impossible to guarantee universal basic income to everyone. In a word, I contend that it is unrealistic to enforce universal basic income since it violates the rule of gaining pay through work. In fact, the implementation of universal basic income, instead of eradicating poverty, may put more people at the risk of it.
解析
材料探讨了“无条件基本收入”这一话题,大致可分为两部分内容,包括提出这一想法的原因和它在试点产生的结果。
前六段中,作者陈述无条件基本收入政策得到支持的三方面的理由。一是现在工资太低不足以维持生活(Work no longer pays.);二是大部分工作很可能会变成计算机化(at risk of computerization),结果是可做的工作越来越少;三是传统的福利政策也大不如前。因此,无条件基本收入政策有其合理性和必要性。
最后两段则以加拿大和美国为例,介绍该政策试行后的结果。加拿大的一个试点(pilot)说明无条件基本收入不仅能消除贫困(ended poverty),而且能减少就医人数和提高高中结业率(high-school completion rates)。而美国的例子则体现了让人喜忧参半(more mixed)的结果:一方面减少了贫穷(reduced poverty),但另一方面人们却更懒了(make people lazier)。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/HikMFFFM
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Earlyanthropologists,followingthetheorythatwordsdeterminethought,believedthatlanguageanditsstructurewereentirel
Abroadpublicdiscussionofenvironmentalproblemsbeganinthemid-1980s,whenthefirst"green"groupsformedinopposition
Technologiescollapsethedistancebetweenadesireanditsfulfillmentbyreducingeitherthetimeortheeffortinvolved.Thi
Aprojectlikelytoevolveinthenearorintermediatefutureisspacetourism.Todayspacetourismhasbecomeapurecommercial
IngmaBergman’slatestworkasascreenwriteris"Sunday’sChildren".SetinruralSwedenduringthelate1920s,thestorycen
Secondlanguageteachingshouldfocusonencouragingacquisition,andonprovidinginputthatstimulatestheconscious【S1】______
PASSAGETHREEWhichuniversityimprovesthemostintop10?
江南的春天素称多雨,一落就是七八天。住在上海的人们,平日既感不到雨的需要,一旦下雨,天气是那么阴沉,谁也耐不住闷在狭小的家里;可是跑到外面,没有山,没有湖,也没有经雨的嫩绿的叶子,一切都不及暗天好:有时阔人的汽车从你的身旁驰过,还带一身泥污回来。记得六七年
陕西菜虽然没有名列全国的八大菜系之一,但作为千年古都、历史名城,餐饮风格自成一体,具有浓郁的地方特色。陕西饮食,凭借着历史古都的优势,挖掘继承历代宫廷美食之技艺,博采全国各地之精华,以品种繁多、地方风味各异、古色古香古韵而著称。至今很多都保留周、秦、汉、唐
A、Notfast,notslowly.B、Withabitofchange.C、Slowlybutclearly.D、Witharoaringvoice.B在第一部分对话的最后,男士问女士,演讲速度是要快一些还是慢一些。女
随机试题
急性脓胸在病程上超过几周为慢性脓胸
治疗强心苷中毒引起的室性心律失常,应首选的药物是()。
某检察院申诉接待室《申诉指引》中的下列哪些表述是正确的?()(2011年司考,卷二,第75题)
经营收入是指向社会出售、出租房地产商品或利用房地产自营时的货币收入。包括销售收入、出租收入和自营收入。下列有关方面的理解正确的选项是()。
A上市公司在2012年度利润分配及资本公积转增股本实施公告中披露的分配方案主要信息:每10股送2股派发现金红利0.5元(含税,送股和现金红利均按10%代扣代缴个人所得税),转增4股。股权登记日:2013年3月1日(注:该日收盘价为49元);除权(除息)日:
在企业中,岗前培训计划通常采用()的方式制定。
讨论法是历史课堂中常使用的教学方法,简述运用讨论法要注意的问题。
设f(x)连续可导,g(x)在x=0的邻域内连续,且g(0)=1,f′(x)=-sin2x+∫0xg(x-t)dt,则().
(Like)sculptors,modempainters(wereinfluenced)byprimitiveandancientart,(which)demonstratedinthe(works)oftheGaug
WritinganArgumentativeEssayI.Structureofanargumentativeessay—introduction:1)atopic2)some【T1】______information【T1】__
最新回复
(
0
)