2. 考研
  3. How did we get brains big enough to create machines with artificial intelligence? Some suggest that it was to help keep track of

How did we get brains big enough to create machines with artificial intelligence? Some suggest that it was to help keep track of

admin2018-02-17  21
问题    How did we get brains big enough to create machines with artificial intelligence? Some suggest that it was to help keep track of all the people, and their roles, within our growing social groups. Large, well-integrated and co-ordinated groups improved our chances of survival because they made the division of labour possible.
   The alternative explanation is that our brain power is due to needing brains that facilitated problem-solving and invention. Whatever the cause, our evolved problem-solving abilities have thrown a spanner in the works. Google’s artificial intelligence machine AlphaGo upends the evolved social contract. Now we can only hope that the machine will help us understand how to preserve the value of individuals who have no contribution to make.
   Until recently, for instance, Lee Sedol’s unique selling point lay in his ability to beat all-comers at the ancient Asian game of Go. Now a team of human beings equipped with AlphaGo, an AI tool, have beaten him. After the first defeat, Sedol pronounced himself "in shock". After the second defeat he was "quite speechless". After the third he confessed he felt "powerless".
   This quiet revolution has already started. You know about Google’s self-driving car. Artificial intelligence is already better than most doctors at interpreting medical scans. It is organising school timetables and finding the optimal delivery schedule for supermarket supplies: getting Easter eggs into the hands of slavering infants involves AI.
   You’re not even going to notice the takeover. Next time you’re in a supermarket, give the self-service checkout a hard stare. It’s essentially a static robot. And this robot has human assistants. Those people who turn up when you attempt to buy alcohol are summoned by the machine.
   The human assistant is still necessary, but only because the manufacturers and programmers made a decision to limit the robot’s capabilities. They didn’t have to: if we decided we wanted fully autonomous robot checkouts, we could equip them to read iris scans or fingerprints, or simply use face recognition.
   And that would require us to sign up and hand over our biometric data. Given a little time to get used to the idea, most of us probably would do, and more jobs will go. That tells us something about why we should start coming to terms with the implications of AlphaGo’s success.
   It’s not clear our big, clever brains can solve the problem. Maybe those who profit from making human roles redundant could pay a "human capital gains" tax: we could charge the innovators for replacing a job and divert the money into social programmes. But how to make Google pay to implement its AI? We may have found the problem AlphaGo can’t solve.
By citing the example of the AlphaGo-Sedol battle, the author intends to show that______.
选项 A、artificial intelligence is a likely threat to the current social landscape
B、artificial intelligence has a proven ability to subdue human beings
C、artificial intelligence is powerful enough to help human beings
D、artificial intelligence has beaten the best player of the game of Go
答案A
解析 主旨题。本文通篇讲述了人工智能对人类社会构成的挑战：颠覆社会契约、人类存在价值受到质疑。以AlphaGo-Sedol battle为例，说明了人类在人工智能面前的价值似乎难以保留，而人类社会规则面临潜在的威胁。[A]与文意相符，为正确答案；[B]中的subdue是“征服”的意思，显然跟原文主旨有偏差；[C]非原文的核心观点；[D]陈述的仅是具体细节，非作者的根本意图。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/DzX7FFFM
0

考研英语一

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)